1. Welcome to the #1 Gambling Community with the best minds across the entire gambling spectrum. REGISTER NOW!
  2. Have a gambling question?

    Post it here and our gambling experts will answer it!
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Discussions in this section are assumed to be EV- as they are outside of the Advantage Play section. For EV+ discussions, please visit the Advantage Play section.
    Dismiss Notice

Roulette Understand Luck NOT Randomness

Discussion in 'Roulette Forum' started by precogm, Dec 7, 2024.

  1. daveylibra

    daveylibra Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2018
    Likes:
    14
    Location:
    England
    Of course it would change the result significantly! The gap between chance and the cumulative hit rate is incorrect.
    It would also change the result of the equation you gave in your previous post.
    But more to the point, we are asked to believe that this proves beyond reasonable doubt that 'powers' are evident, and yet there are obvious errors to be seen.
     
  2. precogm

    precogm Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2019
    Likes:
    35
    Location:
    somewhere

    No you missed the purpose of my question. You pointed out that the chance line was not drawn at 25%. However, in the previous chart in the video it was at 25%. You are implying that drawing the chance line on the chart incorrectly by a small factor somehow changes the conclusion of the result. I am asking you how? To me it seems you are clutching at straws.
     
  3. daveylibra

    daveylibra Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2018
    Likes:
    14
    Location:
    England
    Because he is using the second chart to attempt to prove his 'big statement', that the odds are trillions to one.
    And it's hardly a small factor. It's so easily noticeable!
    Isn't it obvious that if he uses this incorrect value for chance, his conclusion will be incorrect? As the gap decreases, so do the odds.

    And I see he has only 112 results on both charts. What happened to the other 10?

    If he wants convince us, he really needs some accuracy!
     
  4. precogm

    precogm Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2019
    Likes:
    35
    Location:
    somewhere
    It is good to question everything. But, I think what you are pointing out does not change the conclusion. You are simply pointing to a minor issue with where the chance line was drawn. In the previous chart it was at the 25% line and the cumulative chart it was a little below that. Even if the chance line was put at the 25% mark it would still prove his conclusion true. No offense but again it does seem like you are clutching at straws here.
     
  5. daveylibra

    daveylibra Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2018
    Likes:
    14
    Location:
    England
    It seems that this depends on attitude.
    You want to believe, so you only see 'minor issues.'
    After all that effort, it's such a pity that his chart isn't correct!
    To be fair, it would be better to ask the man himself. He is contactable, but my bet is he won't have an answer
     
  6. precogm

    precogm Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2019
    Likes:
    35
    Location:
    somewhere
    If it depends on attitude and you assume I want to believe then does it mean you admit you DO NOT want to believe?

    My understanding of this phenomena goes beyond any of this as I have first hand knowledge of it. I only gave you that video to show you there is research out there if you are scientifically inclined.
     
  7. mr j

    mr j Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2015
    Likes:
    1,823
    Occupation:
    self employed
    Location:
    Milwaukee, WIS
    I'm not reading every post but in regards to LUCK being a factor in roulette, IMO ... 85% bet selection and 15% luck.

    If your bet selection is absolute CRAP, all you have left over is luck and a fun story at the casino (B&M of course) !!!

    Ken
     

  8. daveylibra

    daveylibra Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2018
    Likes:
    14
    Location:
    England
    It's 100 percent luck.
    Try any bet selection and program it. Sometimes you win, more times you lose.
     
  9. Luckyfella

    Luckyfella Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2020
    Likes:
    290
    Location:
    Japan
    Other than the betselection changes the odds, example AP, it's a 100% loser.
     
    mr j likes this.
  10. Mars

    Mars Active Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2024
    Likes:
    25
    Location:
    Macau
    So many of you are such a fucting waste of time the rest of us should earn reparations as pay back for the TOTAL WOT. AP lol. Do tell us about the lucky $1 chip you found behind the custodial team mop.
     

Share This Page