Roulette USA GOLDEN TICKET ON SALE

At Midnight tonight all over the USA ,you will be able to buy a Golden Ticket,inside one these tickets,will be the Full Description to Turbo Genius Holy Grail,good Luck.....

 

spammm

 

Hi John,

Which HolyGrail are you talking about?. The RollerCoaster or the new Hand Saw method? I prefer the last one even if it has been tested on 200 spins because I am a real pussy and I would cry with the RollerCoaster.

 

Bago its the one that comes with a Huge shovel ,for digging yourself out of a massive hole,haha

 

Hello jhon.
You seem to know how the Turbo form works and I think that you also have a really good way to win, I could explain a bit. If you do not want to be here by private, if you want.
regards

 

According to RouletteGhost roulette systems like Turbo's and the KTF don't work.
"Any and all methods will lose long term due to the house edge"-RouletteGhost

"No matter what you test long term it will fail. It is called the house edge and unfair payout"-RouletteGhost

 

It is a diversion because RG is fed up to see his thread at the top of the list everyday.

 

Another idiot to put on "ignore".
I'm so glad this forum has that feature - it's a shame when I look from my phone without logging in, it doesn't block moron's replies and posts.

 

Turbo,

Do you believe that your system would win if you were to flat bet without any progression?

 

You can't flat bet and win because the payout vs the odds of any location winning is in favor
of the house - but you know that.
I'm sorry to tell you that a "progression" isn't the evil word that means something does or doesn't work.
If it's a requirement for something to work - that also doesn't mean it can't win every time you use it.
If a system could change the odds of something appearing then no - but nothing can do that.
I do however have the ability to predict winners better than they appear and be right sometimes.
That "sometimes" is all I need. Thanks to the progression, I don't have to be perfect - and I don't
need to keep jacking up the bet (like you think I do) in order to win - the wins happen.
But why am I bothering lol.
In a 1 spin game such as what plays out in your head when you think about roulette - all that
matters is the payout is less than the odds of anything appearing and it's case closed.
It's your loss.

Hey Ken - analogy time ! lol

So Sir Anyone gives me 10 gallons of gas and says "you can go 300 miles on this"
One road is mostly uphill and the other is flat.
On the flat road I can go 300 miles - but roulette is uphill of course (house edge)
so the only way I can get to 300 miles is to add a little gas to what you gave me (progression).
I still get there, I still win. Getting more gas didn't mean I had to run out 30 miles short
and never make it to the end.
Damn those downhill drivers had extra gas left over and they made it too.

 

Turbo,

So is what you're saying is that you can only win in the short term? Why do system players only focus on the short run results?

Because in the long run...which is what really matters...the expectation is -5.26% on the double zero wheel.

So how can you possibly multiply a positive number (The sum of your progression) x (the negative house expectation) = And magically produce a positive number???

 

Basic......if it needs a progression,it has no advantage over the house Edge.

 

It is because Turbo believes he can counter the limits of randomness with a progression like a newbie believes he can win against the even chances with a martingale over a 10 spins session despite not having an edge.

Hi John, my hole is ready, I hope you are sending me my shovel system with a drone to get out asap!.

 

Hello, if you can counteract the small advantage, I already understood what Turbo is doing and I am qualifying it according to all your comments, I see day after day all your information and the truth that Turbo I think is one of the great experts of this game.

 

Turbo's system is playing hot numbers while running an up as you lose progression. On live wheels I like to see systems that focus attention on hot numbers. Unfortunately Turbo's system is built around the random game, so it's destined to lose the longer you play it. (System players need to look beyond just the next spin or the next series of spins. The long term is what matters.)
On free mode games the system appears to work because the player isn't afraid to play through the garish draw downs while borrowing money from future spins that occur. However in the live game the table limits won't permit such a progression and the player's results will reflect that of other Martingale like systems.

 

The Turbo form is not based on playing hot numbers, nor does it make a progression as it loses, it does not use a negative progression.
His game plays in a short time because it indicates so, chance has limits, when it reaches those limits it has to start again or take the last thing that appeared to start over.
The problem is that he counted things, but as I said, there are things that one has to study and investigate to realize what he really does.
I started to discover what I was doing a while ago, but I did not really know how he played so few numbers, aora after continuing to investigate, I think I know how he does with a few numbers.
The problem of doing with few numbers is that it will only look for few hits, but also exposes less money.
I am trying to see what is better, to finish forming my game, which I think is its form, but it is, I do not care because it works just as well.

regards

 

Why do we have new profiles with barely no posts coming on this website who are fast to declare Turbo as the new Einstein without any argument?. How come if he is an expert of maths and probability, he didn't spot the impossible stat like I did on Roulette-Simulator?. At first, he agreed with me that the RNG is bogus, that RS Rng works like Steve MPR, clustering different sessions that's why we get 9 max repeat, and then when the admin wrote the new max repeater in row (4), he back-peddled and changed his mind, that it was just a bug, all his lessons and arguments have been proven invalid. Let's not talk about the max sleeper that for him was around 450 in the long run recently, proving that this idiot never tested anything for long spins sequences.

But let's treat this new comer as a no-fake:
Sergio, losing one chip every 37 spins on a single number is a lot, especially when you are also tipping the dealer like it is commonly done. You don't know, like Turbo, you don't play for real. With a 20$ chip, you would have lost in 37 spins what you are earning in Espana for 8 hours of work. And get in mind it is for only 1 number, if you are playing more, it is worse. We are talking about flat bet there, betting an up as you lose progression like Turbo (your master) is doing, it will be much worse.

Also Sergio, when you are a so called expert, you don't fight on forums arguing like a child that free mode roulette website are the same as the real thing, you just open (AT THE VERY LEAST) an account with free money and play against a real wheel and real table limits (Celtic Casino). And when you have money and some balls and above all the so called HolyGrail, you are not afraid to put real money on the table on a website that accept American Players to play. Here is one:

https://www.betonline.ag/