Roulette Very original idea!

Been having some deep thoughts about this game today... here's an interesting system to try:

Bet 1 chip on High. If lose then double up on High - but also add 1 chip to the low single street that caused the loss.

If you lose again then add a chip to the 2nd low single street that caused the loss (so you've now got 2 streets covered) and then double up again on High to 4 chips.

If you win on High you can move down 1 level to 2 chips on High (or it might be best to stay at the same level) - but keep the 2 streets covered. If the zero ever comes in then perhaps cover that.

You play until you either get a win on one of the streets or one of the specific high numbers repeats - ending the cycle. Reset everything back to just 1 chip on High and nothing on the streets.

Any time you lose you double up on High and add a chip to the street. When you win on High (but no number has yet repeated) the above is only a rough guide to the new starting bet for High based on how many Streets are in play - perhaps somebody else can figure out exactly how much should be on High with or without the Zero:
1 street + High = ?
2 streets + High = ?
3 streets + High = ?
4 streets + High = about 16

./index.php?topic=16509.0

http://www.rouletteforum .cc/index.php?topic=16509.0

 

This is no different than covering more and more of the table each spin with more and more chips.
Sure you're chances of winning a spin increase - but when you don't win you have lost everything that you gained.
The negative progression gets so high that all of the "small" wins along the way get erased.
Negative progressions are downright evil and never work out for the player long term
(sometimes not even short term).

 

Again.....compliments of RF. I might even burn my password so I cant log in and respond to this s**t.

Like I said, they are 6-8 years BEHIND!! They (not all) will have to go through all the BS methods (I'm sorry, holy grails), before reality sinks in of what will NOT work. Kind of like reverse engineering is what I compare it to. If you can ELIMINATE what will NOT work, start from that point !!!!

Ken