Misc The VCT Thread!

Pre covid: getting 20 sessions per week at green tables was doable.

Winning 60% of large bet hands is doable AND a must considering spread limitations.

Winning 50% of minimum bet hands is doable with a column count. But you need deep pen to maximize profits. Otherwise, it's long days of exchanging dollars.

A session win is $250 at a green chip table. That is also a session loss. If you play 20 sessions a week. That's 12-8. Or $1000 a week. 50 weeks annually would be $50k. Is that doable post covid. Absolutely not.

Was it before covid? I don't know. I probably played the equivalent 40 weeks a year on a declining scale over the decade of play. Had I played more would I have got banned sooner? Tough question. I was usually surprised when the ax dropped.

Had I known covid was going to hit and how things changed after it did, I would've pushed harder.

 

Objective Proof:

Forgive me Mr V. We have a retired divorce lawyer who is an Atheist, smokes a little weed, and believes KJ is a blackjack pro for 18 years.

Not that there is anything wrong with any of that. I just find a bit of irony in all that and alot of humor.

I tend to put life into 3 categories. 1.) Divine intervention. 2.) Human manipulation 3.) Coincidence

1982 was my year of divine intervention. 2010 was my year of human manipulation personified. Ironic that seemed to happen when I turned to God for help and answers. The rest all falls under coincidence or maybe the result of free will.

My best friend believes it 99.8% divine intervention. Considering his life, I'd have a hard time arguing his point.

 

ReDietz writes: I don't know if kewlJ is a professional card counter, a short order cook, or a brothel worker in Pahrump,

Taters says: I'm curious. What is it KJ wrote that two guys my age that have played little or no blackjack become believers?

The only way his claims could be proven is to go and witness his play. An observer, with casino savvy, should be able to be not suspected. So much for the anonymity thing.

Now in sports bets. One could always list their plays before the game.

 

KJ writes: You are in the same league as your new buddy up in Reno who almost daily challenges me to play him in blackjack one on one in a saloon like it is the wild west.

Taters says: it would be like taking candy from a baby. But that's okay, save your money. The meek one from the east.

 

Mr V writes: Let us know if the suspected "heat" develops upon your return after your doxxing hiatus.

Tater says: The life and times of a short order cook and brothel worker.

 

This thread should be relegated to the feud dump. It's just tater with an anti-KewlJ monologue, so why is it not in the feud section?

 

Because it derives from VCT comments.

 

Singer writes: ou're funny kew. The real word is CONTROLL. Tater controlls you on GF and I controll you over here. The entertainment part is watching you continuously get caught in lies, then trying to lie your way out of it like you just did. And who doesn't notice how desperate you are to set your lies straight so you only worry about them 23 hours every day

Tater says: Actually I ve taken it easy on the fragile one lately. My questions/comments were to Redeitz and Mr V. But I knew KJ would bring me into it. He did.

 

KJ never did respond to my question...not that he has to, but it would be good form.

 

No, there's no such thing as "it derives from." The site doesn't post its own quotes. Tater posts them. As such, it belongs in the feud section since everything Tater posts about kewlJ is negative and is part of a feud.

 

The UNKewl one writes: "Rob Singer's story changes more frequently than the sun sets and rises."

So, who claimed he was dead? Not dead. Gay? Not gay. High school dropout? Not college educated? College educated. Lives in Vegas. Doesn't live in Vegas. Plays blackjack. Doesn't play blackjack. Tall? Short? Skinny? Fat? Doxxed. Was not doxxed. Everything he posted was true. Not true. And so on.

 

It's very simple. You don't post about me at VCT. I don't post about you here. Can't believe you even comment on something so trivial.

 

Over at VCT Alan Mendelson has posted something about providing care for his ex-wife in her final days (reminds me of what I read about Lucille Ball's doing the same for her ex-husband Desi Arnaz). Of course, the UNKewl one has to turn it into an argument about whether R.Singer did or did not hit a jackpot. And that's the way small minded (and small brained) people are, they can't let go of of a thought once it fills the limited space between their temples. It also really irks the UNKewl one that anyone could support someone that UNKewlJ has decided must not be winning in casinos. It does further substantiate what R.Singer has always said about the UNKewl one, that he simply LIVES within his own mind, via a "concocted virtual life on internet gaming forums."

 

Sad. Very sad.

 

The UNKewl one writes at VCT: "Don't ya just live these stories by degenerate gamblers? 'I was down to my last couple bucks and won 53k.'"

Just the fact that the mere idea of going on a run, and winning and winning from just a small amount of chips to close out with a pyramidal stack is alien to this UNKewl low end player proves once again, that he's afraid to jump his bet when he needs to. And guaranteed, based on that he's obviously never experienced any sort of exceptional win, he's afraid to leave any sort of big bet out there for long. Anyone so obviously inept and afraid could never be much of a blackjack player.

No wonder he has nothing to talk about - he's never played the way a blackjack player is supposed to play, which is why he ended 2020, in the red and gave up, and why he has given up playing blackjack entirely in 2022.

monet at VCT on the UNKewl one:
You are too serious.
You lie too much.
You don't get the jokes.
You are the Joke

 

Over at VCT accountinquestion posted some nonsense about R.Singer’s finances based on super secret government sources! and then soon after declared that it was all made up and that “no other member on here took me seriously and if they did they're a real dumbass.”

But wait a minute - who bit immediately and bit hard? That’s right - none other than - THE UNKEWL ONE with a rousing few words of support (in his usual bold face no less): “Well done AIQ. The problem is Rob doesn't deal in facts (or reality).”

What a surprise (NOT). The dumbass UNKewlJ, who is no stranger to making up nonsense himself and quoting imaginary sources, stumbles forward to present himself as the real dumbass of the forum, yet again. Liars are always quick to believe the lies of others.

I am sure accountinquestion was not surprised when UNKewl fell in line with playing the imaginary dumbass of the forum:
accountinquestion on the UNKewl one: Literally, your story is something anyone who cares enough could figure out via books and reading the internet. While I find your stuff interesting to read, you've never said anything interesting except for some story you told me in private. I believed it but now I wonder if I wasn't just fed bullshit. At the time I thought you were a legitimate person and have taken things from that convo as true. I now believe this was a mistake.

 

Mdawg is relentless. But it seems your getting a break.. KJ is back to Rob.

 

KJ writes: MaxPen and AIQ, I share your view that the casino industry is a nasty, vile, predatory industry. I don't think that gives me the right to cross lines that I know in my heart are wrong. If you feel otherwise, I guess that is your thing.

Is it ok to murder someone if you have decided they are a "bad" person? Is that the standard now?

Tater says: Let's hope not for KJs sake. Hmmm, fake murder - fake death. Where does that stand in the sudden high standard of morality?

 

Mr V. There's "the law" and then there is "morality."

Taters says: Years ago I umpired a co-ed church league slow pitch softball game.

The guy runner on 3rd base thought it was the Wolrd Series and he was Pete Rose.

The lady catcher was probably just happy to get out of the house and enjoy the sunshine.
She was standing on plate cheering.

He sends her ass over tea kettle into the backstop. He was totally within the law and the rules as she was blocking the plate. I ran his ass anyway.

Now kicking his ass in the parking after he blocked in my car was not within the law.

Hmmm. Maybe the law needs to brush on common sense and get closer to morality.