Las Vegas GF Chat Room

Wrong, Rob, oh, so wrong.

My "fitness" (which is good, BTW) had nothing to do with my decision to decline / "blow off" your invitation.

As I made clear in my responsive post, meeting you (and your wife? What has she got to do with anything?) was not a high priority for me: it still isn't.

I also made clear I suspected you'd find some way to weasel out of it and leave me standing there with my dick in my hand, just as you've done previously to others, due to your ongoing forum feuds with your detractors (pretty much everybody).

So no, I didn't want to waste my time.

I made it clear to you that if you wanted to meet me you could do so by coming to Chinook Winds casino in Lincoln City when I was there, and you declined.

Pacific City is not my "home turf," but Lincoln City is: as stated I offered to allow you to meet me there on MY "home turf."

My offer to you is still open: happy to meet you at Chinook Winds upon reasonable notice: I make this offer not because I want to meet you (I really don't care either way) but because it seems important to you to meet me.

“if the mountain won't go to Mohammed, then Mohammed must come to the Mountain”

 

Bottom line: it was chickenshit of you to fear driving a few extra miles up YOUR coast to meet me where I said I'd buy you dinner. Your excuse is weak and puts you in the same category as that cowardly POS redietz. And when someone goes a thousand miles from home and extends an invite, only a moron would counter-offer it.

If you remember, I extended the invite because you chose to claim the muscle car I was driving wasn't real....you know, like your and others' foolish wishing that my jackpot, my cash, our son, our RV etc. etc. etc. aren't real. Instead, you went into panic mode and, probably after talking it over with fellow cowards max, kew, redietz and DAN especially, you decided it was far better to keep a safe distance from the truth in order to be able to continue lying, rather than have all your bs assertions destroyed.

You people look stupid to outsiders. No wonder you're an unhealthy pothead whose lungs are filled with toxic black smoke. And here's a hint: going to Chinook Winds isn't going anywhere.

 

LOL

What, me fear?

I had and have no fear of driving up the Oregon coast to meet you: get a grip, man.

Why would I possibly fear you?

What, are you the boogeyman?

Why didn't you come to Chinook Winds?

What were you afraid of?

Oh, as for your throwing shade on CW: I am comfortable there, good comps, old school slots, and it's in a beautiful seaside location overlooking a huge ocean beach in Lincoln City, a neat little town.

Fact is I've no need to go to Las Vegas to gamble as I can find all I need in Lincoln City.

 

Rob, next time you're in the area I can meet you at Chinook Winds:I'll buy you a bag of nuts.

That might go good with that 9.5", eh?

 

And folks, this is what happens when your brain is completely destroyed from decades of alcohol (and who knows what other substances) abuse followed by a solid three years of being skull fucked by a long, thick length of RS-Wurst. You become an unintelligible mess, unable to read and comprehend even the most basic information. But hey, it’s good for a laugh so we thank the 9.5 Fan from Montana for his contribution to forum comedy. LOLZ

Speaking of low lives though, this drunken disaster would certainly know. I mean, he threatened to kill the Wizard, he launched into countless racist tirades, made remarks about LarryS and the Nazis, abused countless others. Yep, he sure is an expert! It’s no wonder he’s so desperate to induct someone else into his scummy club.

I know, I’m terribly triggered. Right? LOLZ

 

wittle beachie got his fewings hurt again. LOLZ! He got himself exposed for being a broke ass bitch. LOLZ! Got two figure bankroll. LOLZ! Don't bet it all in one place, wittle beachie. LOLZ!

Everyone has the right to be ugly but wittle beachie abused the privilege. LOLZ! Hey, beachie, don't you need a license to be that ugly? LOLZ!

Maxie tired of rump roasting your ass? No wonder your lashing out. LOLZ!

 

All you do is show fear when you try to change the place I invited you to--hoping that I wouldn't be able to do it. And what kind of a dumbass are you anyway? I was with my wife, we just drove in from a trip to Maine from Arizona, and our hotel room was across the street at Cape Kiwanda Inn. It was a no-brainer for you to go a few extra miles to meet us. For sure, you were extremely afraid to be anywhere near me. And I may not blame you after seeing your cowering now.

You and your Chinook Winds. What kind of addict are you anyway ...

 

You gonna keep beating this horse?

Looks pretty dead to me.

 

Should've put YOUR picture up instead V.

 

Hmmm...That seems conceptually impossible: I thought that "a dead man tells no tales?"

Let's leave it at this, for now: two prideful, guys, neither wishes to take a knee to the other.

 

You know V, not a bad idea. I've been battling posters for more than 20 years, and many think I'm a nasty, tasteless scoundrel who lives a miserable life. But the exact opposite is true, as I am able to body slam posters while delivering verbal online assaults last heard on battleships, while my personal life has been extraordinarily blessed with family and so far, unusually excellent health.

Most people don't and shouldn't give two hoots about the real lives of others, but with me, because I'm so hated on forums, they want the worst for me to be true. I kinda like being in that position, because none of it alters our reality.

I realize most of you don't want to believe I had the Newell for 8 years, but that's because acceptance of it would also be tied to accepting that I put down the double up play just as I described. Which is foolish if you see it from my end for two reasons: first, owning a Newell is a stupid thing to do. Aside from it being a huge ongoing money pit, it's one big hassle to drive, park, and maintain. Secondly, we could have bought it w/o the DU profits, but I'm not THAT stupid.

Which leads me to my big VP jackpot earlier this year. I realize it's a tough pill to swallow for pedestrian gamblers on forums, and I knew it would create even more hatred due to envy, and everyone would come up with every reason under the sun to try and discredit it in order to put their troubled minds at ease the best they could. There could be no acceptable proof no matter what. Even if Dan didn't sleep thru our effort to meet & verify, none of you people would've even believed him, because you'd then claim I paid him off to deliver the goods. In other words, it's official: UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, NEVER ACCEPT THAT SINGER HIT THAT HUGE VP WIN!

Of course, put yourself in my shoes--how much does acceptance by a puny serial liar like kew change the balance in our retirement accounts? Or by anyone else believing it? It doesn't matter one bit, which is why I enjoy all the hate, the name calling, the lies, and especially the "Singer's broke!" claims....as we drive around and around the country doing all sorts of interesting things, while they all stay in their casino ruts forevermore.

So yes, I'll now put away my sniper rifle and give everyone who survived a chance to breathe.

I post for fun and entertainment, and that's all.

 

Oh dear, VCT now has to endure the biggest lying phony to ever come down the pike's, continuing barrage of "look at me!" "look at me!" essays (thank you tater for always pointing that out about the nervous little lying twit kew).

As he shamelessly continues to pass off his lies as fact along with his fractured denials of others' successes, he just can't help himself contain his disdain for tater and all that he ever truthfully posted about.

But we understand --losers in life such as kew can't stand the success of others, so he has to constantly lie about them in order to be able to cope with the reality of it all. And to top it off, he has to continually keep lying about his own failed life and self, just to make certain in his sick & twisted little mind that others see him as his self-fantasy views him.

And oh yeah, tater emailed me a while ago that kew's story about tater supposedly going to kew's slum building was nothing but more kew bs. I guess tater really irked him when he accurately articulated exactly why kew was not and could not be the pro BJ player he claimed to be.

 

You're STILL perpetuating this utter bullshit? Give it up you useless old hack!

 

Exactly what I was mentioning!
It really doesn't get any better than when this type of poster displays his displeasure. When they get tormented by life like this, I tingle

 

OK now this is precious. On VCT, kew is continuing his failed effort to discredit tater's having made a living playing BJ in Reno casinos, which a jealous kew cannot fathom because he loses his ass whenever and wherever he plays. And knowing tater cannot and will not ever come back on to slap the puny little twit down and back into his place--as he's done MULTIPLE TIMES before--kew thinks he's being smart using a one-way lie. Never mind that he's getting laughed at at VCT for his bullshit. Kew can have no part of no one accepting his twisted desire.

Which brings me to music! Yes, today my granddaughter asked me who it was playing "Smells Like Teen Spirit". I told her Nirvana, and she said she never heard of them. Instead, all she hears on today's FM is junky "look at me!" and "it's all about me!" so-called "singers" who, with their annoying "eh-eh-eh-eh-eh" sound, all sound exactly the same. And has anybody noticed that, while multiple generations have had BANDS like The Doors, Led Zeppelin, The Beatles, Lynnard Skynnard, The Allman Brothers, Janis Joplin and The Holding Company, The Scorpions, The Jimmy Hendricks Experience, and on and on creating extraordinary music for decades, this current crop of musical zombies show up alone, with their big mouths and all kinds of electronics synthesizers, and devoid of any bands whatsoever!

Finally, the only way I'd have ever gone to a useless freak-fest such as Burning Man, is if there were a cute young gal there wearing a sign that said "I'm gifting hand jobs...good clean fun" and I kidnapped her for the duration. Of course, it helps to be packing more than 90%? of male attendees and not be totally embarrassed to flaunt what you've got....like most high school and college "boys" are when taking gang showers.

 

On a positive note for all you losers, I decided to help some of you out of your ruts by resurrecting the Singer Five once again for the upcoming NFL season.

If you're unfamiliar--somewhere around 2004-2008 I graced the loudmouths on the LVA Sports forum with my weekly Singer Five picks, for two years. And as I did then, I modestly bet the games I picked. Also, there was one of the five picks each week that was labeled a LOCK, and I bet that game slightly heavier.

Now this is not something you'd see the quickly faded away redietz be doing. Putting up picks BEFORE games are played just isn't his thing. He's more into telling everyone "Hey gang, I just placed 2nd and my girlfriend 1st in the weekly Hamilton Holiday Wiseguys Football pick'em tournament." "If you want to verify it then you'll need a secret password to get into the site, but passwords aren't available right now. I'll see what I can do, so contact me if you're interested."

Seeing that I won about 68% of my picks posted on LVA Sports, I'm gonna try and beat that this year.

Week #1 picks:

Buf -2.5 over LAR.....$100
TB -1.5 over Dal.....$100
Mia -3 over NE.....$100
Den -6.5 over Sea....$100
Az +4.5 over KC.....$200

Josh Allen is going to tear up the Rams secondary. The team is as weak a defending SB champion as we've ever seen.

Tom Brady NEVER loses to Dallas.

Has there been a more pitiful story than the Patriots, with their nothing QB Jones, in 2022?

Russell Wilson is NOT gonna play poorly against his former team, who WILL play poorly.

As for my Lock of the Week....sure Patrick Mahomes is gonna be playing at the stadium 9 miles down the road from our house Sunday, and while the Cardinals have a little shit for a QB who gets injured trying to show off running every year, Az. ALWAYS comes out of the gate strong. And this year will be no exception.

 

Tks for the picks Rob. Years ago when you posted them all, I bet the other side and had my best sports betting year in 30 years

 

First, regarding myself:

1) I was monitored for many years in the annual Las Vegas publication, "Tipsters or Gypsters?" Also known as The McCusker Report, it was published annually in Las Vegas in the 80's and 90's. Each year, your complete record was published for all to see, including breakdowns of percentage, profit, and business practices. I have also been monitored by Handicappers' Report Card, The Sports Monitor, and Satellite Cable Handicap out of Buffalo, where my smiling face was on television for the first two months of the season. In addition, I was vetted for inclusion in "Who's Who in Sports Gambling." I've also been vetted and published in magazines such as The Humanist and have had op eds published in various papers around the country.

2) Two of my plays during football season were publicly available each week for 30 years in The Wise Guys Contest, run by Playbook. Also, my plays were published in the Playbook newsletter (available on national newsstands) for about 10 years. These plays were, of course, published before the games were played, as one would expect.

Regarding Rob Singer's claims in the post above:

1) I cannot emphasize strongly enough that when it comes to sports gambling, Argentino (let's use his real name to directly assign responsibility) does not know what he's doing and has no expertise. He also has no history of expertise. He simply makes things up.

2) To correct him, his "about 68%" may refer to any number of things (games without point spreads, perhaps?), but it certainly does not refer to his cumulative overall versus-the-spread results. No handicapper in history has won 68% of their games versus the spread long-term. It has not happened, it does not happen, and if anyone wants to wager on it going forward, it will not happen.

I hate taking time out of my busy day to correct someone misleading the public and lying about their own results. Perhaps Argentino managed a one or two week stretch at LVA where he won "about 68%) of his wagers. That's possible. Perhaps he won 68% of his money line picks at LVA. That's possible. But HE DID NOT WIN 68% of NFL plays exceeding any significant number.

 

Boz and kewlJ, if you want to bring this up with the site hosts to debunk Rob's claims above, I can put you in touch with monitors or provide monitor documentation.

I realize Argentino was probably just trying to provoke some response (it's his only actual ability).

Boz, these are MDawg type of claims. You have been conflict-avoiding regarding Argentino's claims. This is clearly in the MDawg ballpark, maybe worse.

 

You can always identify when redietz gets uncontrollably irritated--he uses my real name thinking it bothers me

68% was over two seasons against the spread.

How about providing one of your secret passwords for us to verify virtually anything you wrote?

And you're just as weak as they come red....as in kew-territory. Let's see---who not THREE days ago said their posting days were over, because it just wasn't worth it anymore? Well, THANK YOU for letting me know I'M worth it!

You know redietz, I'd challenge you to an NFL picks contest for the season, but I've done that before. And true to your cowardly word, you've never accepted and you won't this time. I guess it's just not in your nature to put up a pick PRIOR to a game being played.....