Las Vegas GF Chat Room

Mdawg, initially, when you told the story of contacting Attorney Nersesian's office, you said it was you that did so. Now you say it was some 3rd party, that you know of. I can go back and find the quote if you like, but I think you know I am right. The fact is this claim is bullshit. No attorney is going to tell some random caller whether or not they represent somebody. It is just more of your games.

I don't doubt that you are an attorney. Never did. But let me ask you this: How many casino abuse cases have you tried or been involved with? And of that number, how many were in Las Vegas? Just guessing but I will bet it is the same number that I have tried and been involved win.

But you are speaking about an attorney that specializes in such cases and has been involved in many. A history shows most are settled and of those that go to trial, he does very well. I think he knows what he is doing.

I really have no idea how unusual it is for a casino to just supply the attorney with video upon request. As someone who knows nothing, I would have thought 'no'. But on the other hand, in a case of casino abuse, occurring in a casino where everything is recorded, that video undoubtably is to get to the claimant's attorney and it is going to be the key piece of evidence. Can we agree on that? I have never heard of a case where the video was not part of in a casino abuse case.

I will neither confirm or deny Mr Nersesian's involvement in this matter. He should not be harassed by you or anyone involving this online trolling stuff that we all engage in. That is just out of bounds. So I will put it this way: When I spoke with my attorney the day after this incident happened. His words were that he would immediately inform the casino that they need to preserve the video and that he would get the video. He said it may require a subpoena, but that he would get the video. I mistakenly thought mention of a subpoena involved a judge. I was wrong, as you know. I didn't ask anything about that, but I took that "may" to mean sometimes they fight him and sometimes they don't. Either way in the end, he will have access to the video. And in this case, he had it a week later when I visited his office.

I have since found out he has that backroom portion of the incident, but not the part that occurred on the casino floor. I have no idea why there would be a different standard based on whether it was video of the casino floor or video of the backroom. If you or MrV has any thoughts as to what the difference is, I would be interested in hearing, as I am not going to pester my attorney with these kinds of questions. I want to allow him to do his job, should we move forward.

I can't stop you from thinking or saying whatever you want about me, true or not true. That is evident after several years. But this is a rather big deal to/for me. I would ask you to put any trolling and "feud" to the back burner and not try to sabotage anything.

 

A good faith gesture to facilitate an offer of compensation, and avoid an order of compensation?

 

You are asking MDawg for a favor?...that he should bestow upon you an act of civility, courtesy and respect that you've never accorded him, so that you may somehow benefit from his kindness?

Just like that, huh? Just because it's a rather big deal for you?

Is that how things work?

 

This really doesn't involve you coach belly, but yes I am.

Maybe this situation can even be the catalyst for ending this nonsense from which no one benefits.

 

While a bit cryptic, by the above post I believe you mean the video was given in the hopes of promoting settlement without litigation?

If so, then yes, that is certainly part of it.

 

From July 2022:

Part of the reason that it's obvious that AxelWolf could never be much of a skilled anything, is his poor memory. He actually has admitted time and again that he can't remember much about anything that happened or was said from more than a few months ago.

Now with UNKewlJ, he not only can't remember whatever was said months ago, but even can't recollect or keep straight his own version of the story that he presented days ago...it has already shifted from a crucial detail of a court order for a video, to the video's simply being handed over by request. Next he'll change the story to say that this supposed attorney never said that the media would need to get involved to push any lawsuit forward successfully.

And therein we have another nail in the UNKewl "Spiderman" cape of a supposed gunslinging crackerjack blackjack card counter. Besides that he lacks the demeanor, self discipline, patience or even resolve to perform under pressure and not crack, as he has cracked time and again before our eyes by way of coming back again and again for abuse after declaring that he will never return, or by losing his composure and posting nonsensical insults that have gotten him banned from multiple forums, he is also just too stupid and has far too poor of a memory to ever be successful at keeping track of the cards in the decks (could never, ever do that, and he knows this), let alone at maintaining a simple count. I mean, the man's an imbecile, can't even keep track of his own lies, how could he track the deck.

 

OK MDawg, let us hypothetically assume you are correct (an invalid assumption, but work with it).

If KJ isn't supporting himself in LV via card counting and other forms of AP, why would he go through DECADES of posting about his play on various boards?

Attention?

Hell, if that's all he wanted there are easier ways to get it.

Given what you have learned about him "in the real world" pleasw weigh in with your opinion, based on fact if possible, as to his actual circumstances.

I've never met him and never will, but I believe that at minimum he lives in Sin City and plays BJ and other AP opportunities regularly: would you dispute that?

In other words, would you concede that he lives in LV,and plays BJ / AP opportunities?

If so, what is your beef?

Do you think he exaggerates how well he does?

He certainly seems to know a helluva lot about BJ, and didn't at least one forum member on one of these boards claim to have met him and confirm that he seems to be what he claims?

I'm just trying to determine if it anythng other than KJ being gay that irks you so much about him.

 

Didn't UNKewlJ declare a couple days ago over at VCT (for the umpteenth time) that he was "done with GF.com" and would not be posting here again? As you have pointed out MrV, it's that sort of thing that feeds his "enemies" with fodder to use against him, that he seems incapable of keeping to any sort of resolve.

Notwithstanding that UNKewlJ's poor memory and fondness for lies lead him to try to revise history right and left, I never investigated him - someone / others did, and shared the information with me, and...

 

So you can be a pure kunt all these years.

You can tell others to shove it up their arze when it’s suggested that all you need to do is throttle back your bile, misinformation posts , your self proclaimed troll, disrupting posts, your on every other forum except this forum your sock puppetry, by the way are we to believe that this forum the shithole backwater loser’s forum , your words this about this forum , is exempt from your account puppets .

You can be the kunt is that right? But when you are squirming like a maggot with diarrhoea seeping from all organs , YOU WANT EVERYONE ELSE TO BE THE BETTER PERSON ?

You fucking lowlife.
I say fuck you.
I say YOU put the yards in , you show you can be the better person, stop acting like a kunt , just read your shit posts to members this forum, I don’t give a flying fuck about other forums or how they interact with you .

Clean your shit up here, starting with apologies to various members this forum.
Clean your shit up here by being truthful for a change.

My bet is you’ll never have any klarse.
Let’s see if your next batch of posts are shit posts here being a pure kunt to all and sundry.
Rlmao.

 

Dan the Man Dandruff posted at VCT a very even handed assessment of "reasons UNKewlJ 's story might be true" and why his "story might be bullshit." He missed a couple of the issues MrV and I have tossed back and forth, but over all, if this were a scene from the Ten Commandments the scale would have tipped to one side heavily already (with no chance for UNKewlJ to step up and place a brick on the scale to tip it back in his favor).

I know it distresses the UNKewl one to no end that one of the last who seemed to be somewhat on his side, Dan the DanDruff Man, has finally turned against him. He was equally distressed when he realized that Ozzy and AccountInQuestion (and mickeycrimm) turned on him too. In fact, if you read through that thread every single poster, including AxelWolf, including jbjb, are doubting his story. UNKewlJ's story and his reasoning for his actions (or lack of actions) just...do not compute.

Even now it's almost like, his claim that he might now decide to proceed with legal action is being presented more to try to make his story more believable, than for any other reason.

 

I will like to comment on this in conjunction with your last post to me.
I would like to start a thread to discuss with YOU various things you are obviously not up to speed with regarding gambling. I would like to take the opportunity without impacting on other posts this thread, nor possibly inferring slighting any members on this thread to be able to get a fuller understanding of your actual experience, knowledge and or misconception of gaming.
Are you open minded enough to conduct a discussion? Let me know thanks.

 

BTW when UNKewlJ says "That is what I get for being such a figure on forums for so long" what he means is, This is what I get for being such a JACKASS on forums for so long.


As far as UNKewlJ's "knowledge" on blackjack, it all reads as textbook - in all his thousands and thousands of posts he has almost never described a single hand of actual play!

accountinquestion on the UNKewl one: Literally, your story is something anyone who cares enough could figure out via books and reading the internet. While I find your stuff interesting to read, you've never said anything interesting except for some story you told me in private. I believed it but now I wonder if I wasn't just fed bullshit. At the time I thought you were a legitimate person and have taken things from that convo as true. I now believe this was a mistake.

 

Of course I am willing to discuss issues with you.

Why don't you open a new thread in what seems the best section here, i.e. "Lounge?"

 

I would expect you'd have figured all this out by now V.

Kew craves attention, yes. But it's just a by-product of the main drive exhibited by the guy. He's a younger person who not so surprisingly feels entitled, but he has no skills and has never contributed to productivity throughout his life. Further, regardless of how the media has been pushing the gay agenda on us in recent years, he knows he's basically cut off from the normal social world, which can be devastating to those in his generation.

So he's chosen, as I've said a thousand times on these 2 forums, to create the life of a successful BJ player online, along with all the dressing. Of course he's well-versed on the game--its all a part of his charade. Who has more time to read books on the subject--and spend GOBS of hours talking about it and himself online--than an unemployed single gay man?

It wouldn't be much of a stretch that he's precisely as MDawg pointed out: one of those zombie-like locals who spend hours each day staring blankly at the nickel poker machines.

Your belief about kew is exactly what he wants others to believe about him. I do believe however, that your dislike/distrust of what myself and MDawg report about our gambling histories does have an effect on you seeing the whole kew-picture clearly.

Bottom line: kew isn't really that difficult to figure out. He sort of makes it easy, especially when he posts about concocted incidents like this latest fiasco.

I'm guessing he's gunning for a future movie to be made about him. But it will be almost entirely fiction.

 

Here's my official recommendation:

No legal remedies should be pursued.

But if they are, the only way this ends well is if:

1) Upon return to the scene, KewlJ tries to use hat cameras to record events to be used in a reality TV show.
2) I'm listed as a co-writer on the show.
3) Upon Kewlj's disappearance, his brother and I use the "found footage" for some great ratings after networks bid for the show.

 

Rob, I admit it, I could be wrong about KJ, but if so I gotta give the guy a little *golf clap*.

Unlike MDawg and yourself his stories never rose to the level of setting off my bullshit meter.

 

UNKewlJ claims to be a low level hit and run blackjack player. Take that away and you have left - nothing.

In my case even UNKewlJ admits that I'm playing at a high level, everyone actually knows that. Where ranks are broken are in deciding whether MDawg wins or is dumping vast sums. Take away the winning (or losing) and you still have a high roller.

With Rob too, whether people believe in his big wins or not, everyone knows that he has in fact been gaming for many years. UNKewlJ would have us believe that Rob dumped a fortune, but still, that translates to big play.

So that's the difference - at the core, we have two substantiated big casino players. In UNKewlJ's case, nothing has been verified.

 

What all this has done is force kew into changing his story several times, and now saying "sorry guys but I just can't talk about this anymore right now" after he's been non-stop blabbing about it all week

Seems awfully funny that his hotshot attorney Nersesian comes in 2nd place when it comes to offering advice. Kew is saying that what WE'VE all told him is now how he is proceeding!

That's how much of a bullshit story this is. He's right now trying to figure out exactly how he can get out of this pickle with the least amount of embarrassment. I also have no doubt all the pressure made him kick up his investment to dimes on the poker machines.

 

Are you asking if that happened, or is that a rhetorical question?

 

Is that really what I said Rob? Or on Tuesday afternoon after numerous people, including you to some degree, offered advice, did I say I was "considering....reconsidering" and a very short time later said that I had contacted my attorney and told him I wished to meet and discuss this further? (meaning I wanted to hear more from him, as well, maybe most importantly). Come on Rob be honest....any of that sound familiar? If not I think you know where you can look to refresh your memory.

But really, the discussion is at VCT. Don't be sniping from here like a coward.