Las Vegas GF Chat Room

I have clearly stated my position. On this forum, I am dealing with you, Singer, Mdawg, Blackhole. It feels like visiting here is visiting the den of evil. Or a better analogy might be visiting under the bridge to the troll's home. An even politer analogy would be playing an away game.

Now there are a couple other members here that aren't trolls, like MrV, redietz, mickeycrimm. Well mickey isn't participating in this discussion and all 3 of them are members at VCT, as are you and Singer and Mdawg if he chooses, so they are all welcome there. That is where I would rather any kind of serious discussion, if that is even possible.

When I decide to post here is nothing substantial that can benefit the forum in any way. It is trolling the trolls for my personal entertainment and amusement.

 

UNKewlJ about to entered the "Woe is Me" , "Why won't anyone believe me?" depressed state.

The answer of course is that, as AccountInQuestion put it, You on the other hand are not that believable

 

Mdawg, how is that case where the hooker you took back to your room, drugged you and stole your watch up her cooch coming along? It has been 7 months and that is usually about the time frame for these cases to come up isn't it? Did you drop the charges?

Here is another question for you: Why did you take the hooker up to your room/suite? How come you didn't take her to the mid seven figure Mdawg Mansion where you would have been better protected?

Here is another question for ya. Coach belly usually does these "gootch Ya" questions but he seems to give you a pass, so i gotta do his job.

So why does a guy that purchased and owns a mid 7 figure mansion (your words), need over 1000 comped suites over a 4 year period?

Of course the biggest question remains: 1000+ high end comped suites over 4 years, while the player wins substantial 6 and 7 figure amounts. Is this really the way Las vegas and Las vegas casinos work?

 

Anyone can feel free to chime in on that last question.

Anyone?? Anyone? Bueller? Anyone?

 

Well, the claimant says it happened.

What, do you think he'd actually lie to impress strangers?

 

You guys are missing the forest for the trees. MDawg would never lie to us, his loyal readers. So, as Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's most famous character chides us, "When you have eliminated the impossible (MDawg lying), whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."

The truth has been staring us in the face for years. Winning six and seven figures and getting comped suites night in and night out, for years, is not the way Las Vegas works...unless you OWN the casinos. See, there is a historical precedent for this. Howard Hughes lived in the upper floors of The Desert Inn (a fine and beautiful place) for ages. Undoubtedly, had he deigned to play in the high limit blackjack room, Mr. Hughes would NOT have been banned for counting cards. In fact, the dealers would presumably ASSIST HIM. AND THEY WOULD COMPLIMENT HIM ON HIS WINNING.

Sound familiar?

And, Mr. Hughes would have access to any suite he wanted any given night.

Thus, the conclusion is clear. MDawg is telling the truth, and he owns large pieces of many of these casinos. He wins. He gets free suites whenever he wants. The dealers applaud him. And he writes about it in his memoirs so we, the Thomas Magnums of the world, can experience a little of the high life.

Logical. Elegant. A masterpiece of deduction.

You can all thank Sir Arthur Conan Doyle.

Not only that, you would reach the same conclusion by asking why MDawg is never banned, backed off, trespassed, or booed. He plays, continually wins, and nothing untoward happens. I direct you to another Conan Doyle classic, The Mystery of Silver Blaze, where Holmes says, "I direct you to the curious incident of the dog in the night." The inspector says, "The dog did nothing." Holmes replies, "That is the curious incident."

When the house does nothing, the inference is clear. The house does nothing because MDawg IS THE HOUSE!

Please send all thank-yous and tips to:

Bob Dietz
1412 Forrest Dale Lane
Johnson City, TN 37604

 

Although I'm not mentioned in red's post, it certainly was weird. Just plain weird

As for where kew's make-believe world had his "back-rooming" occur..... imaginary case files don't show up on the Clark County log. So SP is as good a guess as any!

Imagine being too stupid to realize all cases are publicly available online except for criminal case exceptions, and you go around yapping "I'm not allowed to name the casino!" even after further blabbing that "I told a few of my AP friends in LV everything".

This is somebody who clearly has no idea what he's doing or saying, and someone far too dumb to get it.

And there's more. A call into the LVRJ showed they pulled nothing but a blank, just as my nephew did and just as I ended up with. And here's another teachable moment for our fabrication boy: YOU DO NOT NEED HIS NAME TO SEARCH FOR THIS KIND OF CASE. ANYBODY ANYWHERE CAN FIND WHERE THIS FAKE EVENT HAPPENED

Game, set, & match: everyone but kew.

 

That's the way it worked for Eliot Jacobson's big winner...he won 7 figures over 3 years, and they were still comping him to get him to come back.

Do you think they would let a player, who got lucky and took them for millions of dollars, take their money someplace else to play? They wouldn't try to entice him to return and give them a chance to win their money back? Is that how casinos work?

CET comps players based on how much money is wagered, the players "earn" reward credits...no host discretion necessary.

Of course, you can't play anonymously, you must play "rated"...so maybe that's why you don't understand how a player can both win and get comped.

 

LOL. Speaking of fake events, I don't see the Hellcat parked at your home address. Where do you stash it?

I have to inform you, you gotta be in-state 183 days a year, I think, to count as a resident. You should probably register the Hellcat in-state. Maybe that would help. Get a tag.

 

Was he lying when he said for weeks that it was SP, or is he lying now saying that it wasn't SP?

 

Have you spoken to Eliot privately on this matter? If so please advise us of the total amount of time played and total number of comped nights involved in the comparison of Mdawgs play vs the case Eliot spoke of. I have spoken privately to Eliot so I already know the answers to these questions. And I am pretty certain, you are not going to get him to speak on this matter again, as he has expressed zero interest commenting on Mdawg or his "claims".

So coach belly you tell me what numbers you think Eliot was talking about in the case he was involved in (spread out over 3 years) vs the claims of Mdawgs spread out over 4 years. And we will go from there.

 

The kewl-j thinks he's clever when he engage in his favorite ploy of the mis-direction. And I see that the taxes delinquent, magnum-p-i wannabe, uber-tout has made the scene. Thanks Zeus I'm stock up on the Guinness and cashew, hey hey.

 

Jacobson wrote that the player won 7 figures over 3 years.

How is that materially different than winning 7 figures over 4 years?

Was Jacobson's player comped during this winning streak, or not?

Would Jacobson's player have been comped if he visited more often during the 3 year winning streak?

 

I didn't see your Beamer parked at your home address.

 

Interesting theory Redeitz. Question: will you be using this tip/thank you money to pay your taxes? Don't get too excited....I am only playing. I don't care one way the other about your taxes, if you have paid, if you haven't, nor what reason may be involved. I don't think that is anybody's business nor reflective of anything else.

So moving on? Did Howard Hughes gamble? I have no idea. I guess I could look it up. Kind of unusual for people THAT wealthy to gamble isn't it? And if they do it is for peanuts usually? Like I think I read that Bill Gates will play $5 blackjack. This too not important. Just fun discussion.

Now the main gist of your theory: Interesting. But I don't think it is true. If it was, I gotta say that I would come down on Shackleford harder than I ever have for not revealing THAT, nda or no nda. I think Michael is safe though.

There is a far simpler explanation. And that is that Mdawg is just leaving out all or most of the losing sessions and play. Maybe the winning days are exactly what happened on those days. But he is leaving out the losing days where loses total greater than the winning days. And if he is playing a progression system as many of us think, the losing days could be far less in number and still wipe out all the winning and then some.

If you just add that one relatively small change to the mix, that he is leaving out the losses and losing days, then everything else makes sense. Everything then falls to just the way Las Vegas and the casinos work. They would welcome his play. Tell him how great he is and comp him the appropriate amount for his losses which might be 100's of nights a years. One small change to the story and everything makes sense and falls into place.

 

One player made trips once a month or so, over 3 years, the other lived and played 250+ days a year, maybe even as much as 300+ a year for a couple years, but definitely over 250+.

The total play involved and comped nights would well over 10 times as much in both cases. (probably more like 20 times). You people that like to use your "maybe" theories got away with that comparison early in the Mdawg "adventure". We are now well, well past that comparison.

 

The kewl-j grasp of the baccarats proposition is lacking sorely. I never pass final judgment on the m-dawg baccarats claim cuz there are ways to make the proposition a ++++++ev situation, hey hey.

 

You have no idea if MDawg's total wager was greater or less than Jacobson's big winner.

But if he gave them 20x the action, then wouldn't 20x the comps be appropriate?

 

Coach Belly seems to have now separated from the other trolls that are claiming none of this event occurred. Coach is now moved on to a theory of double mis-directs and things like that. I can't say much about any of that.

But I can say this: This new direction that coach belly is taking....I don't think he came to that on his own. I think somebody, probably not on this forum, gave him a gentle or not so gentle nudging in the direction he is now headed. And don't read anything I just said into anything. I am absolutely abiding by the terms of my settlement agreement. Now I will not say anything else, even as vague as this on this forum, try as you might smelly Belly.

 

You seem to be certain that Micky Cimm led an incredible life. It's obvious you have proof of this. Or is this the same type of proof you posted on assorted forums about yourself for 20 fucking years? Top advantage player of all time???? Bet Axelwolf wouldn't approve of that comment.

Please explain what you know about Mickey for fact that made you come to your conclusion.