Misc WizardOfVegas Forum is Dying

In part because I sort of "like" Nathan; not a bad sort, but Nathan just cannot seem to get any cerebral traction.

I use the word "clueless" to denote naivete, and "dildo" to emphasize Nathan's trollish propensities.

 

What does revealing the terms of the deal have to do with all that? If Nathan and WoN both agreed, for lets say a $50 food comp instead. Or if they agreed to meet up again for some sexual favors(we need a blowjob icon)(===. How would that make us want more personal information as proof shes real? I think us knowing the agreement would make everyone more likely to believe and move on.

Demands (suggestions) for pictures were already being tossed around before this.

I thought Nathan himself wanted or thought about posting her picture anyways. If she wants to do that, then who cares? Perhaps you think she is not able to make good decisions herself? If not, then that would lead me to believe she also can't figure out what a fair deal is.

Perhaps you now have a soft spot knowing he's a she?

Anyways, BBB easily took care of the problem temporarily. I dont think she liked being fooled either. Good thing she doesn't have a soft spot for chicks.

WoN if you are reading I think I made that cock to big (=

 

Really? If we knew what the fair deal they made was that would change anything? I call total BS on that. If it was a fair deal there would be zero to talk about regarding the deal.

Of course a new thread in the miscellaneous discussion section would be more appropriate.

P.S. Nate is short for Nathan.

 

Both.

 

Sorry axel, I reported you for accusation and doxxing!
Nothing personal.

 

Its all good, I think I reported myself for the same thing.

But isn't Nate short for Nathan in RL?

 

That didn't answer the question at all. Which was why didn't you post exactly that same message on WOV?

Speaking of cerebral, What part of your cerebral cortex has become the accepted internet forum boards leading sole authority on profiling anonymous people via osmosis? Is there instructional uboob video to teach this ability.

 

Yes, I guess it could be. Maybe Nathan stole it from me.

 

Hey, that was fairly clever.

Not at all witty, just fairly clever.

Try again.

 

Jeez, we gotta be clever AND witty? You think this is the wov site or something?

 

I have also felt there's a fine line between being witty and clever and thinking condescending arrogance is being witty and clever.

 

The only reason I had mention that is because Mission quoted and agreed with you. I thought I would give him something to think about since there is always a chance you and Nathan are one in the same.

I didn't want to be disappointing too you and your theory that I think everyone is a sock-puppet.

 

Statements which are condescendingly arrogant can sometimes be witty and clever, but are usually just mean-spirited insults.

Truly witty and clever statements typically transcend the swamp and soar upwards, to infinity and beyond.

 

Which probably explains why I seem to constantly look down on your posts.

 

Let's take a closer look at the Nathan's suspension on WOV. This is probably the most unjust suspension in the site's history. The abomination known as the Beached Whale is completely out of control and one would be hard pressed to think this is what Shackleford had in mind when he wrote the rules. The only reason she joined the site was to hawk her failed game invention and now that it has failed she is a bitter, jealous person looking to take it out on others.

A thread was started by new member RedParrot called "Stranger Split $4000 Jackpot With Me". He wondered, in retrospect, if he had done the right thing or if he would suffer any repercussions. He turned to WOV for advice and input from it's members. He was immediately trolled and ridiculed by the usual untouchable members who have free reign to do as they please because they are above the rules just like the mods. Before I get to the hijacking and trolling, I want to say that RS made a legitimate response with some valid points...saying that the jackpot winner may owe child support or alimony. Remember that word...alimony. It comes up a lot in the thread.

Here are some responses to RedParrot's query:

Onenickelmiracle with his one track mind posted a video entitled "Pound Me In The Ass". Hijack number 1.

Bill Ryan resident troll: "Perhaps he liked your hobo bag". A direct insult to Nathan. Hijack number 2.

Watchmewin: "Sure has the same imagination and style as Nate a GoGo. Hijack number 3.

RogerKint: "That's not what Brian Boitano would do". Hijack number 4.

Saber: Don't ever trade pants with someone". Hijack number 5.

MrV: "Alimony has been described as buying oats for a horse you don't ride anymore". Good one, MrV! No hijack. Contains the word alimony.

Nathan: "Alimony sucks". Bam! A 14 day suspension for hijacking. Clearly there was no hijacking as Nathan went with a topic that had already been mentioned more than once. That didn't stop that abomination from swooping down to issue the bogus suspension. Ibeatyouraces immediately stood up to the Beached whale with this: "Nathan didn't hijach anything. You've done worse offenses". Like the coward she is, Beached Whale did not respond, choosing instead to run and hide until it blows over.

When the number 2 and the number 5 posters on the site start objecting, you know something's wrong. You know others feel the same. Maybe they will also summon the courage to challenge the tyranny. AxelWolf, a Vegas insider and personal friend of Shackleford has called BS on Mission,Pav, BJ. No response from him either. These guys are not chronic complainers...if anything they stick up for the mods as a rule. That should say something.

 

WTF. I thought I was the one who said, "Perhaps he liked your hobo bag" I was thinking it, I wanted to say it, I thought I had said it before. Bill=told my shit.

Nathan should NOT have been suspended for THAT. But It doesn't bother me. I think she had it coming either way. It's probably just a matter of time before she/he is permanently gone. Never fear, Jason the slotter will pop up in her place.

 

What, me worry?

 

Here's the short thread results of the WOV stranger pot split thread started by parrot. I was bored and waiting for my media downloads to finish. Sorted by some post labels. This kind of shows what happens on wov with most threads where the same untouchables get their digs in early, wanes after a time then never really gets back to the original topic. 52 posts, all in the same day except for the last one. The untouchables tried hard to turn it into a attack nathan thread. Again, axel came through with the sock puppet hints. I see this on WOV almost every time, almost no matter the subject. Also, beachbums impulsiveness is very apparent. She seems to come in later and make snap decisions.

op=original poster
hj=hijack (usually has nothing to do with op.)
Ac=accusation
tnat=target nathan
In=insult
Sp=sock puppet
OnT= ON topic
SSA=simple smartass
ontsd=on topic but slight derail, not an issue

op-stranger split jackpot with me.
1st op ^
2nd ont
3rd ont
4th tnat-hj-ssa -... pound your ass
5th tnat-hj-ac-sp-in .. hobo bag
6th hj-tnat-in-sp-ac ... nate agogo
7th hj-tnat-ac-sp ... kentry-ish vibes
8th hj-as-sp tnat... exactly what kentry and nathan would say
9th nathan - ont about alimony
10th hj-in-tnat
11th ont- speaking of this topic ...
12 hj-ssa - boitano
13 hj-ac-in/ac ... troll/ban imho
14 redparrot- ont-thanking.
15 ont - usually one of the above ...
16 ont ...had a similar exp last year ...
17 ontsd-
18 ontsd-
19 ont
20 ont
21 ont by op parrot - what was illegal?
22 ont
23 hj-ssa- buying oats for a horse.
24 ont - mexican boy toy
25 ont
26 ont
27 ont
28 ont
29 ont
30 ontsd - nathan says alimony sucks=ban
31 hj-ssa - dont do crime, wont do time
32 beachbumbabs says to nathan ..hj and trolling this thread with your second off-topic response-two weeks.martingale for 2nd offense. (nathan was actually on topic both times)
33 ont by face - puts sabre in place.
34 ibeat ont and denounces beachbum - nathan didn't hj anything. go back and read page one. You done worse offenses.
35 ont
36 ontsd- thats so low..
37 ontsd i meant someone whose money ..
38 ontsd one time when i was in vegas
39 ontsd For about ten years
40 ontsd I think he was hoping for
41 ontsd THAT'S NOT TRUE, it happens all the time
42 ontsd If he was on the self exclusion list
43 ontsd True. And ironically, no sooner
44 hj-ontsd There was a case where casino employees
45 ontsd
46 hj-ssa I'm not really sure. Lmao
47 ontsd I love that rule and think
48 ontsd I don't know how many casinos you
49 admin m146 warning wmw about attacking nathan.
50 ontsd
51 ontsd
52 ontsd

 

This is the corrected paragraph that I meant to post. Axel sentence was ended period. The next sentence was supposed to be this.
"I see this gang up by the same people on WOV almost every time, almost no matter the subject. Also, beachbums impulsiveness is very apparent. She seems to come in later and make snap decisions."

No intent at disrespect more than normal to Axel.

 

I can't deny that I have given Nathan a hard time. Right or wrong, I can still sleep at night, especially knowing there was something that didn't smell right. I still believe she has other aliases. I think she is somewhat trolling at times and other times seriously ignorant.