Roulette Using parameters to hit sleepers

I know that sleepers are supposed to be after 111 spins , but I have borrowed the term for the purposes
of this project.

If you were to sit at a roulette Table and place a bet on you favourite number, example 10, it could become a sleeper. It may not come in for over 300 spins and it would therefore be an impossible
betting proposition. If you started at 112 spins your money would soon vanish into the casino coffers,
that's if it came in at spin 320. If instead you had a parameter of 105/161,you could then place a bet at
105 spins with 10 likely to appear in the next 56 spins. A confident result would come from the fact
that for over 3 years data shows, that this will be the outcome.

At this early stage in the project there can of course be no such confidence, but if an accumulation of results show that it appears within it's parameter, it must at that stage be considered an advantageous
bet. In my model probability changes to accommodate the demands of the parameters. I'm hoping a
similar occurrence happens with the parameters in this project.

The maximum number of spins at a Table is 28 spins. Move onto another Table or back to the same
Table next day.

I will list the 37 parameters in the next post.

 

37 parameters as follows:

01) 027/083
02) 171/227
03) 052/108
04) 069/125
05) 007/063
06) 061/117
07) 036/092
08) 054/110
09) 028 084
10) 049/105
11) 040/096
12) 042/098
13) 037/093
14) 028/084
15) 094/150
16) 090/146
17)020/076
18) 045/101
19) 024/080
20) 044/100
21) 049/105
22) 061/117
23) 024/080
24) 064/120
25) 127/183
26) 041/097
27) 052/108
28) 127/183
29) 018/074
30) 048/104
31) 031/087
32) 027/083
33) 017/073
34) 018/074
35) 091/147
36) 026/082
37) 148/204

The 37 parameters are taken from my chart in the topic (space between spins)

Many of the parameters are far too low at this stage and this will change over time. I will check
out 40 or so more Tables, in order to get a more realistic column of parameters.

 

You are wasting your time on this path of research.

 

You take number 10 as an example of your favorite number.
The likelihood is 50% that you will hit that number within 25 attempts.
After that, it gets worse.

Cheers

 

What you can do is to find out the short term true odds for numbers.
For example number 28 hits within 16 attempts with 50% likelihood.

Or you can measure several numbers/sectors and find out the true odds in the short term.
I add the model to measuring and calculate.

 

First negative comment.

With your wealth of experience I would have thought you would explain in detail why
it is a waste of time.

I already have a model that is very successful and here I simply trying to create a
version of it.

Have a little faith, stop with the negative waves ( Kellys Heroes movie) lol

 

What has this comment got to do with parameters?

 

delectus,

Could you explain what these "parameters" mean? I have no idea what you're trying to do here.

 

The number 10 is just as likely to appear in the next 56 spins whether you have waited for 105 spins or not.

 

This is not meant to be negative, Ken, known as Mr J, knows all about cold numbers. You might want to get him to tell you some things.

 

You have missed the point. The player sitting at the Table may get lucky and
number 10 comes in 23 spins . However he/she may have to wait for 320 spins.

Supposing instead the player used a parameter and waited until a 10 had not
appeared for 105 spins. The 105 is if you like a trigger to start placing a bet.
The player is no longer in the situation of waiting at the same Table for a
long sleeper of 320 spins.

The player will now expect 10 to appear in the next 56 spins. Don't forget he/she
would move to another Table today, next week. next month, it doesn't matter.

Ok this may sound incredible, but if you were to know that x number of 10's had
come in within the 105/161 parameter, it would give you confidence to place
a bet.

Over the past 3 years I have seen many 10's come in within the parameter .

This project is intended to gradually produce a number of successful results.

 

Thanks gizmotron, I always welcome helpful comments. However this is a unique
project and comments will really be useful once the project is up and running.

 

Einstein has just been proven correct that there is a glimmer of light beyond the Black Hole in the universe . Never give up.

 

There was nothing negative about it - I'm simply telling you that the road/path you
are on is a waste of time. My "wealth of experience" along with my comment should be
enough then.

If you'd like, I can run off spins in RX - it has columns for "Longest without a hit" and
"Spins since last appeared". It's incredibly easy to run off as many spins as you'd like
and see the results.
There is no "magical" barrier linked to specific numbers where (for example) #30
hasn't appeared for 150 spins and you think that you know it will appear by spin 200 so
you start betting. It will go to 201. Then with your stats of 201, you can play and it
will go to 300, or 400, etc.
I say "Random has limits" but it wasn't meant this way.
There are ways to play hot numbers and ways to play cold numbers - what you've
detailed here (so far) is a waste of your time so my comment was meant to help.

 

Two major flaws in your thinking/research.

"Triggers" are a waste of time and
"waiting for x to happen before doing y"

I hope my comments help and save you some time.

The most helpful comment is one where you're told the truth. That's what I provide.

To think that #1 has a different and measurable/predictable "parameter" compared
to #2 or #3 because your research of "past spins" has given you this info is a losing
street to go down. But good luck, it may take a while but you'll tell me I was right

 

Oh crap Turbo, somebody has to pay to keep the lights on.

 

TurboGenious if you look at my first post it says "In my model probability changes
to accommodate the demands of the parameters". It is the key component
otherwise it would not work.

You have to try and think outside of the box. I have developed a unique roulette
model for over 3 years, a great deal of work and if it had looked hopeless after
one year I would have abandoned it.

I don't know for certain if this version of my model will work or not, but I am
hoping the probability restriction will be sufficient for it to produce results
similar to the model.

 

WTF? You sound like me. Turbo might be the last guy you need to preach that to.

Ken

 

No, I haven't missed the point. I get what you're trying to do here; you think that by waiting for the trigger (105 spins, or whatever) you have created some kind of safety net. I can't really fault the logic because based on your data it seems reasonable to you. If research has shown that the longest sleeper is not more than 320 spins then by waiting for a prior sleeper of 105 spins you have potentially saved at least 105 units. So it seems that you've saved both waiting time and money, simple arithmetic, right?. But the logic is based on a flawed model of roulette. You only think it's reasonable because of your limited data. Probabilities are always fixed in roulette because (at the risk of sounding like a parrot, lol) the wheel has no memory. If you had RX or some other way of testing your theory on large numbers of spins you would see that what you're trying to do doesn't work, not even a little bit. Listen to TG, he's right.

 

It's simple to test whether your theory works. Pick a target number and see how long it takes, on average, before you get a hit when (a) waiting for a prior sleeper and (b) not waiting (ie not having any idea what the spin history is). If your theory is correct you would expect to get a hit earlier in (a) than in (b), on average.