Baccarat Time

i.e. they keep playing until they lose.

 

A MUST READ


Post # 14 by Gr8Player , and # 20 by MDawg .



ND

 

So, it's irrelevant if ya got a wining style, seriously????? And you think that you will never face adversity and losing session, days, weeks, etc? Some of you cats slay me, hey hey.

 

Seriously?!!!

You’re twisting words here...again! Or you’re just not a sharpest tool in shed!

What I said is, one will face a losing streak at some point regardless of a bet selection. Even players who have a 65% or higher hit rate still face the adversity.

Nobody can have a hit rate of a 100% or close to it. NOBODY!!!

 

At a $100 table minimum you can make serious bank. Play three to four tables a day, well you do the math.

 

You got to understand that soxfan found the holy grail of Baccarat (but it should be called the Russian Roulette of Baccarat) so he just cannot abide by another perspective.

XX---------------------------->

 

Nope I never used the term "holy grail" and I never will. But, the style show a positive, consistent result over 4000+ tested shoe. Of course you wouldn't know that because you never did even test the style. Stupid and lazy are a great combo for ya, hey hey.

 

How did I twist word? I quoted you verbatim, sheesh, hey hey.

 

Because you misinterpreted what I've said in a post #8. Its funny, there are well over 4000 views in this thread and you're the only one who "Didn't get it"! Sheesh!!!

 

I guess it is time for you to put up or shut up as the saying goes. What are you willing to wager to see the test? "Money talks and bull shit walks!" So either talk or walk!

XX------------------->

 

You proved to me that you didn't actually test by the retarded stuff you said repeatedly. I have my testing results ajnd those of my friend and that's all that matters. Yer just a scared, loser recreational player and you want attention from others who you hope will see you as an authority on the game. Oh and 30 units profits per shoe, huh? Bbbbbbbbbbwwwwwwwaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhh what a clown, hey hey.

 

"Money Talks, Bullshit Walks" You prove the old adage! As expected, Bullshit walked! It is curious why you go bi-polar over a mere mathematical exercise? Maybe my test is accounted for by variance? Maybe the casinos are rigging the game? What does stand out, however, is your own guesstimate that it takes 8 or 9 wins to cancel out one 265 unit bust out is correct. My small 40,000+ bet sample (see attached) clearly shows you were close to correct. Unfortunately, 85% win or 15 losses out of 100 shoes on average puts you in the poor house. You're going to need close to 90% win rate to have any hope of showing a profit.

Attached a screenshot of 1 of 2 files. It shows the completed results of 693 shoes group by group. Most is self explanatory showing unit and % profit of each group.

The worksheets at bottom contains each shoe as identified by date and number with every bet placed and includes both gross and net win along with unit total for that group.

So, soxfan, (Mr. Big Balls). How much you willing to wager that I "didn't really test..."?? Either talk ($) or WALK!!!!

XX----------------------------> Ouch!

 

MDawg's post #20:
https://www.gamblingforums.com/threads/time.17820/#post-92690

 

+EV only exist with advantage play and I have never seen any public discussion about it the rumours are that the baccarat solutions for AP is worthless, so to all readers, you should know that any claims of an +EV are nonsensical.

Cheers

 

There are several VERIFIABLE ways to capture +EV at the baccarats so you are utterly clueless, hey hey.

 

You and your banker side betting is just gamblers fallacy have no edge, just plain silly

 

Soxfan i challange you - test van kelen test - if you reach 70+ after 1000 placed bets with no progression you are a man behind your word.
Just post a chart for everyone to see, if not you have empty claims with worthless opinions.

Cheers

 

Don't hold your breath. He's been disingenuous at best with his nonsense.
@Jae and Richie. both of u guys are full of shit, too.

 

I’m full of shit because I liked a comment saying that there are several other ways to verify +EV? I guess I’m full of shit because I CAN verify this.

 

That's nice, I'm full of shit due to liking a post? Time of the month is it?
Grab yourself a nice cup of chamomile tea and curl up with a hot water bottle, you'll feel better in a week.