That's true for that particular shoe but then when you get something like W L L W L W L W L You end up at -4 instead of -1 and so it's swings and...
It's only 25 shoes, but I added up the W and L sequences to compare them. W 1. 39 2. 17 3. 11 4. 1 5. 2 L 1. 39 2. 14 3. 6 4. 4 5. 4 So there...
Shoe 21. W L W L W L L W W +1. Shoe 22. W L L W W L L L W -1. Shoe 23. W L W W L L L L L -3. Shoe 24. W L L W L W W L L L L -3. Shoe 25. L W L L...
Shoe 16. L W W L W W W L +2. Shoe 17. W W L L L W L L L W W W W W +2. Shoe 18. L W L L W L L -3. Shoe 19. L W W L W +1. Shoe 20. W W L W L W W W W...
So by my calculations, that's 70 wins so far and therefore you would have to take off 3 and a half units if you are paying the banker tax at 5%.
Shoe 11. L W W L L W L W L W W W +2. Shoe 12. W W W L W L W +3. Shoe 13. W L L L W L W W W L L W +0. Shoe 14. L W W W L W L L W L +0. Shoe 15. L L...
Blacktiger, If you are interested in counting cards for baccarat, there is a good book on 'archive.org' from John May called Baccarat for the...
6) W L W L W L +0 7) L W L W W L W L +0 8) L L W W L L W W W +1 9) W L L L L L W L W -3 10) W L W L L L L L W W L L L L W L -5 The running total...
That's ok, I made a mistake in Shoe 5 above. It should read +1 instead of 0. There were 6 W vs 5 L.
Just to add that all the shoes I am testing are 8 deck shoes.
I will do 5 shoes at a time as time permits, thanks. Shoe 1. L L L L L L W W W -3 Shoe 2. W W L L W W W +3 Shoe 3. W W W L L L L W L -1 Shoe 4. W...
I will use my 'Baccarat Buster 3' software for testing. It's not RNG! The results are defined from proper card shuffling procedures. It gives a...
One question! What happens in the event of a tie? Do you just ignore it and bet the next hand or do you wait for a new qualifier. Thanks
No problem, it's pretty straightforward.
There are a few different ways how you can tackle the 2's. Looking at those last few results again where we had 5 lot's of -3 because of the...
Separate names with a comma.
