TurboGenius Gambler's Fallacy (absurd ?) Proof II

You are aware the UCAS score requirement for Mathematics faculty to Imperial College-160 as example compared to Southampton-144?

I'm sure you know what a straight 5A* Cambridge A levels qualification is.

Declare your A-level GPA.

 

make him make the video capture of opening the inbox + the relevant msg, showing where/who its coming from including the date display .. the video content should be moving around + the mouse pointer too -- it should be at least 1 min long with the highest resolution & highest refresh rate of frames/second, ideally 4k video

the video feed has a feature to smudge the target =to the anonymous pertaining name, so that when the screen content is moving the selected rectangle content remains smuf=dged/blurred


why;
screenshots are not acceptable, its too easy to manipulate'em, & same for the low-resolution video; at least with the 4k moving-target you'll have a hell of a lot of frames to corrupt & work to do in the 1 min interval to discourage pretty much any scammer to furnish the phony evidence

with the existing recording mainstream-available tools its very simple to produce this without much effort
otherwise, it won't hold & be accepted as a proof & you can shove everything turned back to you up the arse

 

Qudos. Same here. Confirmed.

 

In MJ's defense .. that point by itself really doesn't matter & cannot be used against him .. as is at most/best a very rough assessment, evaluation, & indication of the true CAPABILITY.


At the same time, we all know from his posts -- ie. if he ain't holding something back & the posted content is used as a camouflage & diversion from what he might potentially know & works to keep/maintain the edge of not many using what's advantageous -- what he knows & that he's got nothing constituting consistently winning leverage.

In other words, that with all the knowledge he has, he has not (yet) succeeded in assembling that knowledge in an innovative way & persistent roulette profit favorable way.

 

Well, with this I agree .. otherwise, to be precise, its a strategy at most.

Then again, what LF defined qualifier in his "opinion" post points exactly to a system

 

Two posts ↑ above.

 

No, that would be to say they work SYSTEMATICALLY as the conditions overall change & that following what you say would be a conscious suicide/ruin.

Just like if you drive to the same place every day taking the same route (eg. school, job, insert whatever) the conditions are obviously different everyday you use an enclosed, maybe better congruently looped, system -- but you drive systematically! aware of surrounding, what's currently happening, covering for the possibility outer sphere deviations (a ball rolling over the road, a hedgehog suddenly in your vision, junction crossings over the red light even if your path is signaled as green) -- which doing that repeatedly amounts to the EXPERIENCE.

 

The knowledge he posted on forums is limited to basic probability, probability counting and statistical significance math.

This is how I know he doesn't hold a degree in math which prompted me to ask him directly.

There's no way to find a math solution with his level of math knowledge.

 

Tell someone repeatedly & persistently he's an idiot on .. having nothing else to hedge/prop onto .. an idiot becomes.

As far as I saw & pointed out already, DSAA & MJ keep echoing about a very limited scoped few points, in an attempt to shrink the attention focus, where no solution potential even exists. In a way its genius .. but


as I said, smudging your face down in mud .. can you see the sun ..

 

I think people are taking literally what they’re saying.
Trust me, I understand the point you’re trying make, but I just don’t know how to put this in words right now and make it easier for you to understand.
I’ll try to use how I recognize patterns.
The common type of pattern I see when 2 of the same groupings occur (let’s say 2 blacks was the result). This is where I gotta make the right choice. I can either stay with the same pattern (that black is gonna hit again) or the pattern will break and red will be the result.
By looking at past spins that had the same result (2 blacks) I noticed that the next spin resulted in red winning. Looking further back the same 2 blacks result showed that black was the result.
So it’s still pretty much a guessing game.

Sorry dude, that was like the shittiest example. Can someone else want to chime in on this. He’s keeping it civil and asking a legitimate question

 

This bet you describe is what Asian baccarat gamblers call third liner bet. When the shoe shows a tendency to trend, these Asian gamblers bet heavy on third liners especially on banker hoping for a dragon to form. The 7th banker onwards is the dragons tail.

 

When I use the word bet heavy, the average Asian baccarat gamblers bet your monthly salary in one hand. Some bet your annual salary in one hand. The Asian whales bet the entire casino floors staff salary including the floor manager in one hand.

The Asian money laundering for each runner is at least usd250k per runner per transaction in a standard chip box.

 

For real these asians are def heavy hitters. These guys comes in and drop a ton of cash.
Saw one awhile back, come to a roulette table drop a big amount. Took the dealer not too long to count it, but a lil bit longer than the usual. Dude, ended up losing. Was heading out after our session saw the same guy who lost it all. The dude drive a POS Toyota Camry with the bumper practically hanging off.

Priorities

 

I learned something new

 

Lucky,

Provide one example where math or probability can be used to give you an edge in the random game.

 

You'd think all of these roulette "psychics" would be clobbering the lottery and not wasting their life on roulette.

 

Talk about the total and complete nonunderstanding of what we do. You nailed it in one sentence.

 

I wrote the answer long ago.

Our group of accountants and engineers came to the conclusion that I wrote in this post.

https://www.gamblingforums.com/thre...o-select-the-repeat.22939/page-22#post-131334

If you are ignorant, not educated to the required level to understand my post, is it my fault?

I wrote many times, everyone is entitled to express their opinion.
This is a gambling forum.

 

Yea your right, cause the probability of winning the lottery is so much better than roulette