TurboGenius Turbo, do you remember the discussion on how to select the repeat?

That will just have to do for now. So you are an ANTIFA sympathizer? That avatar of yours is like a virtue signaling ploy.

"Your stupid trends and bet selection are no better than a coin toss:"

Hey dipshit. That's all they have to be.

That favorite series is what, Star Trek or CNN lies to us news? It's got to be brain washing or utopia. I could not be more happy that you think you are right and that's the end of all this.

 

It works, why would he let it go. You make no sense.

 

This is funny. They know it does not work. So they want proof that it does work. And that equates to wasting a life. You push their button and they jump through the hoops like yapping circus dogs. I don't consider that a waste if time. Here's the best part. We both know that someday it will be well known that it was always the truth and that it works.

 

Proof? Proof of what? From you? Nah, I'm still sane.

I had a good laugh at this. "The moron from the gambling forums was right, he could read randomness! His other friend couldn't read randomness, but he could read random. Besides the arguments, they both could read something at some point, they now seem to be right somehow. The only unreadable thing in the world was read by these two forum posters. We've been reported that once the reading randomness guy made 3 net units, instead of 2, in only one 24-hour session. If it's not catching trends, then what is it? And now, let's head to sport news!"
I hope at least one of us is there yet to hear this from national TV.

 

You're right. Too late to learn. The change is not feasible at this point.

 

Lately I've been thinking it's about reading random but at this point it's almost more that I've learned how to think randomly when it comes to roulette outcomes. I don't see chaos what I see makes sense to me. And I can anticipate a lot of it, I know where it's going. If I wasn't thinking randomly I couldn't do that. I've looked at so many thousands and thousands of outcomes in the last 16 years everyday, day in and day out. It has to have an effect on your brain and how you think. Your brain is always working on figuring it out whether you know it or not.

 

01:36:50 synapses ..

 

Ancient ninja lore ..

@Luckyfella, notice the tangent?
Revise your explanation in the above-terms [images] .. my mind/perception resonates much more within such a context

 

Next ones are reeling-rolling / edging-dwelling -- lesson51 .. turning sharply upward -- lesson74 .. & predictable breath+imminency -- lesson76.


I don't if you've noticed this .. but I see definite parallels in everything you've said & this.
This is how the received pm content originated .. abstract overstanding → practical application, although my math knowledge is yet to match it in exaxtness to exploit it to the maximum.

 

& to plug the common roulette paradigm in, including its vocabulary & terminology -- dwelling = repeats, streaks, uniques, (birthday paradox, graph) probability differentials' increase = turning sharply upward.

All you need to is find 'one' -- in the live-movement the line with the lowest entropy, with the temporary least incline = bending of the tangent

 

; meanwhile, the probability differentials increase sharply up(wards) .. that's why its paradoxical.

 

TRD, this post explains the probability.

The difference between probability of each day in a year versus to probability of match birthday.

Slot in 37pockets to replace 365 days.

 

My reply to Quos.

Read the last para.

The positive edge is found in the derivative.
It's not found in birthday paradox math per se.

 

My reply to Ka2 question.

 

Are the differentials connected/imbued with the actual numbers coming out .. or no specific relevance at all, just the amount of?

 

The probability depends on the question you ask.

Given the fixed number of pockets, the derivative is constant, +- variance in observe trials.

Read Shank's post.

 

question asked = bet structure
±variance .. ?, first don't know what you mean second quantified in what

 

Any bet selection on the P/B stream will generate a stream of W/L which will have the same long-term characteristics as any other bet selection, but the outcomes will be distributed differently, so just use that as your new data stream from which you can make selections corresponding to the bet selection which created the W/L stream.

e.g. The bet selection is "bet for majority of the last 3 outcomes to continue. ie, if you see BBB you bet B, if you see PBP you bet P.

B
B
B bet B
P L - B is majority of last 3, so bet B
P L - P is majority of last 3, so bet P
P W - P is majority of last 3, so bet P
B L - P is majority of last 3, so bet P
P W - P is majority of last 3, so bet P
P W - P is majority of last 3, so bet P
B L - P is majority of last 3, so bet P
P W

So your new data stream is L L W L W W L W, which you could call x x y x y y x y if you like. Now you can bet for x to win in the next outcome, or on whatever you think the pattern is. There's nothing special about that bet selection, it could be anything. The point is that each one will generate another data stream in which the wins and losses will be distributed differently. You could even use the same BS again on the derived stream. ie. if you start off with x x y the first outcome derived from this would be W, because the next in the sequence is x (majority of last 3).

 

The answer to your bet structure question.

Shank asked me the same question.

Shank, this is as far as I go about the "science".

The solution is not found in "science" or math.
The solution is found in finance.

Read this,

In the world of risk management, there are four main strategies:
Avoid it.
Reduce it.
Transfer it.
Accept it.


When accountants look at speculation risk they are taught these strategies.
Gambling is a speculation risk.
Worse than undertaking directional speculation of financial assets.
Accountants main strategy is to hedge the risk.
They don't hold bad risk.

To solve the cost problem you need to think strategically like an accountant.
How do you avoid bad risk?
How do you reduce bad risk?
How do you transfer bad risk?
Which good risk do you accept?

When taken all together the risk management strategy is,
you accept good risk,
you transfer bad risk to the casino.
You take no risk when you're not sure if the risk is good or bad.
(If you accept this risk you pay house edge cost for no gain)

There are 37pockets or numbers.
You have to assign them into good, bad and unsure groups as the spin hits one at a time.
You determine the quality of the risk as the spins unveil.

You do that using the probability calculator with the derivative mindset.
And from experimental evidence.

First you have to understand the finance risk management strategy I posted above.
Then figure out how to apply the birthday paradox math.
With the help of the calculator.

Finance strategy first, followed by the math.

This is the "science" that all of you lack the understanding.

I'm also certain that many can't appreciate the info I wrote on this post.
That's why SirAnyone, Benas and MJ will never figure out the answer.
Their basic 1/37 probability, extra pocket, unfair payout and independent spins is school boy math.

 

Correct. Clap, clap, clap.

Or simply ftl or nftl.