Roulette A Challenge 2 - for Turbo M

Fossell,

That's about as valuable or less so than knowing that a number hits about once every 38 spins on a double zero wheel. Knowledge of the probability doesn't enable you to exploit it or side step it in the random game. Believing otherwise is merely the gambler's fallacy.

 

I've already proven this to be false in another thread - Maybe I should post it again.
You can change the house edge into your favor, this is proven.

 

I could say a lot about it - I'm still shocked that Sir doesn't see the value in it even when it's slapping him in the face.

 

No you haven't. Vague posting isn't proof of anything, other than dodging the facts.

Again, no you can't.

 

I must repeat though, that betting the hottest numbers on a live wheel is vastly superior to betting the coldest numbers. So for that reason it's a step in the right direction.

You know, on that other forum they're actually debating whether or not the earth is flat? Over there they're also buried in the gambler's fallacy. Perhaps we can continue the advancement of facts on this forum and get rid of the gambler's fallacy ideas all together.

 

There was nothing vague about it - I showed with examples and details. You refuse to believe anything other than what you currently believe - either that or you know I'm right and just egging me on. No idea on that one.

 

Page 23 in the "What if I told you" thread.
Page 3 in this thread.
Your welcome.

 

Turbo,

Some of us have already explained why that's a good idea, but why it still won't win over time. I also provided simulations.

Others also noted the obvious problem... which is when numbers show early and then stop hitting.

I like the idea on live wheels, but on random/rng wheels it's just not going to perform any better than random guessing would perform. I think you should remove any claims that it works on the random wheels. On live wheels, it can win at times and reduce the edge on some.

 

Somewhere between the lines the (new?) Turbo may have a point. It is some sort of follow the trend, trend is your friend, approach.

What I don't like, is that single numbers betting requires more bankroll that old good color betting or even dozen betting.

 

I haven't played any bets other than inside numbers in ages.
Why win 2:1 or 1:1 when you can win 35:1 and just as often.

 

I tell you what, the selection based on LOT basis is the best part, the progression you said sucks, I've not 1 but 2 better progressions which in combination with TG's selection rocks!

 

That's not a problem Sir - I'm on the numbers that are hitting presently.

Nope - Random number generator or live dealer in a casino with a wheel - the math stays the same.

 

When a first number hit the 6th time,start betting on that number.

When another number hit the 6th time, ignore this new number, continue betting the previous.

Jump onto the first number that hit the 7th time, play as above.

Each time a new higher hit appears, jump to that new number.

On a hit, if no new high recorded,add a unit to the winning number.

Always go back to 1 unit if new high upon hit.

I tested manually on the Roulette Xtreme software, the results look promising.

I tried to make changes on some of the old software written by Spin-Dizzy and Stormer

during the good old days, without success.My knowledge of programming is limited.

Can someone please kindly post a dgt file for this to work on Roulette Xtreme.

Thanks and regards

 

Id been wondering about the progression as well. Ive been using a 2u 3 u 5 u 10u progression and doing very well on real bets and using past spins but then i tried random.org(Can these numbers be trusted?) and had my first large down swing (out of about 60 games) of around 700 units but luckily not for real money! I still think the way i play would have recovered but i ran out of time to carry on and see.
This got me thinking if the progression was to aggressive as ive been trying to devolope my method so that i bet as few numbersw as possible with as little down swing before profit as possible.

 

Hello Ed

Sorry to bother you. I know you are good in writing RX software.

If you have the time, please kindly give some suggestion on how to do the software as posted above.

Thanks and Regards

 

2,3,5,10 ? Why such progression? How many numbers you bet?
I'm using the ''snatch'' progression.

 

To be honest the progression was just something I tried after initially having a 1 2 3 4 progression and would get big wins if my method went to that level but I always thought this was something that I was going to have to look at before long!
I start betting one number and this can go up to four and is totally based on repeats.
What is the snatch progression?

 

Let's say you bet 3 numbers for 36 spins, for 3 numbers their cycle is 12 spins (36/3=12).
Begin by betting 1 unit each for 12 spins, every time one of your 3 numbers hits restart count of spins from 1.
When you missed 12 spins raise to 2 units on each number for the next 12 spins, let's say you have first hit on 18th spin (12+6=18) you would regress to 1 unit each number BUT the count continues, thus next bet would be the 7th.
When you reach 12th without hit raise to 2 again, otherwise if you get a second hit while on 1 unit restart count from number 1 spin/bet.
You may realize that for every losing and winning series/cycles you get ahead, in other words 1 out of 2 ratio when the actual probability is even better 2 out of 3 (disregarding 0).

 

So the Snatch progression is not to ask girl number one to pick three numbers then ask girl number two to pick three numbers...etc.

 

Snatch it up baby yeaaaaah!;-)

Splitting yourself in multiple instances is the way to go, casino might catch one or two of them but never all in the same time!