Roulette A Challenge 2 - for Turbo M

He doesn't just recover. He plays on the commonality and nature of a hot number. His accelerations ahead, way ahead, make up for a system that just recovers and then grinds away. It's the only reason I looked into his claims. In a way it's like my seven step positive parlay. But he is not on just one number also. There's probably more research to do on the idea of selections and how much.

 

I agree... he has given probably more than I would have been comfortable handing out unless the pivot is so significant we won't see the forest for the trees. I feel like I get everything he is saying in the posts and the videos, but I need to THINK harder.

 

Think of it this way. The hottest number has a few cold streaks but rarely does it have them back to back if it is still the hottest number. I think this is what that progression you displayed attacks very well.

 

Let's say that anyone could kill the casino getting on a hottest number that hits from 18 to 26 times in a 300 spin cycle. But a progression needs to take wins like that into account and not dig a giant hole while waiting for them. So a compromise needs to be figured out when you start digging deep. TG uses a blind decision process kind of a rule. So he must have found a compromise he likes.

 

Just looking at my past spins while working on my current method it looks like one number usaully jumps ahead by a couple of hits at some point. Would using your single number progression work if say you started betting on a number as soon as it hit twice then stopping as soon as a second number hit twice, then continued with the progression once a number hit a third time stopping as soon as a second number hits a third time and so on?
Just going by 10 of my past spins ( can hear people sighing.. 10 spins come back when its 10 million ) it would have won but will probably fail long term?

 

Armitage, I am pretty sure someone proposed what you just did on a forum several weeks ago. Funnily enough, they did test it over a million spins (not 10 million however) and it made a lot of profit. Some of the drawdowns looked a bit scary. The rule was to add a chip whenever you had to bet a new number up to 10 chips. If you lose at that point, start again. So the busts were there but it always recovered nicely.

 

Eugene thanks and thats a shame as im trying my best to find a method with as small a drawdown as possible. My current method is based on this but using up to 4 numbers and once a 5th hits stop and then start again at the next level with a progression and other cut off points added so far its been doing well but i dont test over millions of spins!

 

Eugene sorry but what topic is this idea under as curious to see how they play it?

 

What is telemetry? What does it have to do with roulette?

 

i think he just means copy and paste

 

Telemetry shows each step, spin, and each result so that you can check to see that the app executes the progression correctly.

 

You seem almost offended at the suggestion.

But if it works because the MATH says so, there's no harm in testing for 10 Millions spins is there? It should work just as well over 10 million as 10,000 right? The more spins you play, the more money you should make.

Just suppose (gasp!) that your math is flawed, wouldn't you be happier knowing that the system works over that many spins? And assuming you've written code in RX it's no HARDER to test over 10 million than 10,000. You have written some RX code haven't you?

 

At least you have a good sense of humor

 

I do think TG uses 3-4 levels of prog. But not as linear as you may currently think. But I agree your right on with the 23rd spin mark.

 

Question for TG. You know I understand the fundamentals of playing the repeats, but given my current understanding of when to progress a repeat number to the next level of stake progression (and when to drop a number down a level) I would find it tricky to keep track of things with a pen and paper at the casino. I can email you the prob in more detail if you like as its me assuming I'm selecting the way you might be selecting.
I'd potentially be faced with a mass of indecipherable scribbles as the cycles progress! Any tips?

 

You can email me or I can try to answer here - Jefra had the same type of question with tracking at the table.
The problem is that if I post any of my sheets here (or anywhere for that matter) it basically gives away exactly what I'm doing. That's a problem for various reasons.
Maybe I can answer without being overly specific - I'm not sure.
Jefra asked about making a chart of all numbers with columns and lines and charting that way - too much work and requires too much paperwork lol.
If you email me I'll reply if you're on the right track or not - according to how I do it, it's not hard.
I'm actually at the point where I won't need to chart anything, the problem with that is my memory and nothing else.
It's actually pretty bad at this point - but I'm working on it with RX and the online game (Parx) to train myself better - most people could probably do it without a pen and paper. For now, that's not me though.
I'm using a small sticky-note style pad and pencil, that's actually all that I need - 1 small square per session really.
I don't make difficult charts or graphs at the table lol - just writing down numbers as they show from left to right
on the paper and when specific things happen, I start a new line and begin the line with numbers that are important.
On a long session I've used the whole square of paper - on shorter (common ones) it doesn't take 1/2 of that.
One thing I trained myself with from the beginning was keeping track of my chips at the table. I got it so that I could organize chips in-front of me so that at any time I could look down and know my exact balance. Now I actually don't need to do that - there's no "recovery" needed anymore so knowing what I have in chips isn't relevant anymore.
Now I have to train myself to remember what specific numbers to play and how much on each - for now I'm stuck with doing that on paper until I can lose that and do it in my head (like most could probably do from the start).
It's one of my "brain flaws". lol
Hope it helps - being too specific would mean being too obvious.

 

Cheers - I'll send you an email so I can be more specific. Think I know your address. It maybe what Im doing is more complex than it needs to be but Im sure you can yay or nay to that.

 

Will do. My email is in my profile page here.

 

Hot numbers don't necessarily stay hot and cold numbers do not necessarily stay cold. The trend can change at anytime. Don't waste your time on this.

 

Thats precisely what this play avoids