Roulette a VERY good repeater (hot) number method from Ken

Caleb......chill,its not a system im just curious on the frequency drop......

 

My gut feeling tells me that this is not as good, or consistent, as my "three net wins and out" method, sound familiar anyone? Mathematically I should be able to balance at 2 net wins and out, barring that house advantage that should pop up, and it does every now and then. But betting on 2 to 5 numbers has it's downfalls. 5 numbers can dig big holes fairly fast. I'm going to look real close at 1 or 2 numbers only. 1 number can go on for 35 spins and still be in profit. My experience tells me that 1 or 2 numbers can be very hot in 300 spins. On the other hand, 4 or 5 numbers can run at 12 to 14 hits in a 300 spin session and in that session there is no 18+ number hitting. That's the randomness of it all. You only need 9 hits in 300 flat bets to break even. I'm going to guess that Mr. J's really hot method is 1 or 2 numbers only. It might be three if he sees three super hot numbers. It could have a slow moving progression too. I would find it unbelievable to hit a perfect sequence of missing the hot number, while jumping around to hit it in a long, 150 spin progression. But that perfect sequence of death is always around there to make you think that the casino cheats somehow. Like air jets that blow the balls out of the slots for instance.

 

Gizmotron...........have u got Roulette Xtreme ?

 

Nope. Don't need it. Why use a dedicated off-the-shelf scripting language when I can create my own class functionality.

Like this:

Code:

on mouseUp
  global winTotal
  doTheThing
end mouseUp

on doTheThing
    global winTotal
    put random(37) into holdSpin
    if holdSpin = 32 then
        answer "TurboGenius is a winner."
        add 35 to winTotal
    else
        answer "TurboGenius is an idiot."
        subtract 1 from winTotal
    end if
    put winTotal into field "blabberMouth"
end doTheThing 

If I had Roulette Xtreme i'd get a medical opinion.

 

Gizmotron I have to do the ken thing and see that it takes each number to come out on average between success and success to predict their best options? You mean this?

 

Perhaps I do.

 

Then each number has a different average and has a number of balls to bet different ...
Then we have to carry out a control of each one of them for when it repeats playing a number by its number of corresponding turns and logically, imagine that if it is above 35, that number when it comes out repeated is not played?
But of course it's also that when a number comes out it's big gaps then it will do it in small ones, right?
Please give me a push more ..
Will we always play flat?
And what of turbo do you not see well?
Thanks gizmotron, at least there are always nice and nice people, regards

 

Yes, everything is always different.

I will only play this Ken's method flat.

Turbo is one of the very few accomplished Roulette Extreme programmers around here. He is one of only two people to get me to think off of my own game in the past 11 years. Ken, Mr. J, is the other one.

 

Why should the frequency drop be anything other than expectation over time?

Where is the logic?

 

You can't handle the logic.

If anything dropped at the expectation rate, 2.7% over time, then we would all know what is going to happen all the time with every spin. Sometimes you say the most obnoxious things.

 

I had a little play with this one and quite liked it Ken. Reminds me of your 1-8 method from a while ago. Its logical the way it plays repeats.
I was worried at first as I didn't hit for well over 60 spins! But it somehow recovered. Though I prefer adding a progression in too ;-)

 

Fossell, I do too, I mean a progression that is. But I think 3 numbers should be the max. But Who knows. Maybe Ken can shed some light on this.

 

Are you saying that in the long run that you don't know that it's 2.7%? Lol!!!

 

I'm saying that along the way it will definitely be 2.7%, and it will also oscillate enough for me to kill off the casino as it does.

While you are trying to be as perfect as you can be at celestial mechanics within a moving object, I will be taking it easy. I take it easy on you anyway because you are kind of stuck as human beings go. But that's OK, you are just like a rock that never changes. There's so much moss growing on your north side that I expect slugs to mate there.

 

Si Ken nos da un poco de luz para mejorar y pasar a la forma A que indicas.
Por cierto, ¿qué tipo de progresión usarías fossel y gizmotron?
Gizmotron, te estás refiriendo a las brechas entre los éxitos, a jugar los números que tienen menos huecos, ¿no? Pero cuando un número comienza a cambiar, ¿cambia o continúa?
Turbo se refiere a tocar los candentes que son los que están 1 por encima de su promedio de derecha ¿verdad?
¿Conocen información importante al respecto?
Saludos

 

Estoy pensando en usar una progresión para cada número usado. Quiero que cada número comience con 20 a 30 pasos en el valor inicial. Espero que los números calientes aparezcan en veinte vueltas. Después de eso, la progresión de cada número se basaría en la capacidad de recuperación. Es una progresión de molienda.

 

Cambiar a español
One question, is there a topic of which Einstein, who claims to have seen clearly what turbo does, is it possible for you to say what you think he does?
You also say that you have software that helps you find numbers that will heat up in the future, right?
Ami makes me think that he plays those who are above +1 or more and each one with a different chip value and will eliminate those who are below him +1 and add new +1, is this correct?
The dice many different things, first that can be played from the beginning, then the dice would be hot, then repeated, then dice that are neither cold nor hot, aora said he selects some of the first 10 numbers ... People who we study we can not have anything clear with so much change ... Someone could leave some things clear and the right path of truth, not hundreds of ways?
Thanks Colleagues
By the way gizmotron, is saying to play the numbers that repeat within 20 balls, for 20-30 more balls and if not continue to play with a grinding progression? And what is the positive progression and that is to play a few numbers, between 2-4?
I have a lot of information, many roads, nothing really concrete ...
regards

 

I haven't worked on a progression yet.

 

Se a traducido mal.
En el tema Einstein, tú dices que crees haber descubierto lo que hace el señor Turbo y que todo salió ganador,pero que tenías que realizar más pruebas... Es cierto, usted sabe que hace Turbo? Que es mejor lo suyo, Turbo o Ken? O es lo mismo?
Jejeje

 

Ken is definitely better than Turbo, Hehehe!