1. Welcome to the #1 Gambling Community with the best minds across the entire gambling spectrum. REGISTER NOW!
  2. Join our $5,000 Cash Giveaway!

    Win Cash by Posting and Inviting New Members!
  3. Have a gambling question?

    Post it here and our gambling experts will answer it!
    Dismiss Notice

TurboGenius Advantage of Repeaters explained - part 3 - 2020

Discussion in 'TurboGenius's Forum' started by TurboGenius, Mar 27, 2020.

  1. Denzie

    Denzie Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2019
    Likes:
    18
    Location:
    belgium
    Those 1st , 2nd and 3rd seem to switch a lot. But....at least 1 of them showing up......isn't that enough to build up on ?
     
  2. eugene

    eugene Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2016
    Likes:
    328
    Location:
    united kingdom
    I think this is the thing Turbo tries to get across and like you said yourself Denzie, you don't need to be on every number but when there is a smaller pool of numbers to pick from and they are coming up regularly, you should do ok for the most part even just flat betting.
     
    Denzie and TurboGenius like this.
  3. Rulet

    Rulet Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2019
    Likes:
    12
    Location:
    England
    Doesn’t happen all the time, this was a fortune session, distribution can be a lot more irregular than this example
     
  4. eugene

    eugene Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2016
    Likes:
    328
    Location:
    united kingdom
    It's why I said the other day that anyone looking into all this could do a lot worse than really look into Turbo, Gizmo and Mr J's work because you have a really good blueprint for winning.

    Turbo pretty much provides the framework. Ken is right with his 2-4 numbers because otherwise variance can eat away all your profits and Gizmo is spot on that you need to read what's happening as the game is evolving.

    It's all there. Now no two people are probably going to do everything exactly alike but sticking to it for the most part and I really don't see how you could go too far wrong.
     
  5. Rulet

    Rulet Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2019
    Likes:
    12
    Location:
    England
    “I really don’t see how you could go far wrong “

    Do be careful of the variance fairy. She can trick players into thinking they have something that hasn't been discovered by any other clever people in over 200 years, but then alters her ways, bends them over the gaming tables and, whilst wearing a huge strapon, does things to them that makes their eyes water and leaves them in tears. She's can be a real b*tch.

    Best of luck mate. I've a feeling you'll need it.
     
  6. eugene

    eugene Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2016
    Likes:
    328
    Location:
    united kingdom
    I made this a couple of years ago and posted it on a few different sites but never posted it on here. I think it's appropriate for this thread.

    ScreenHunter 12.png

    It shows 5 cycles of 37 spins and displays the hit count. It also shows after each cycle how many numbers are below average appearance, how many have came at the expected frequency and how many are above their expectation.

    So for example, in the first picture after 3 cycles (111 spins) there are 12 numbers that have hit less than three times, 13 numbers that have hit three times and 12 numbers that have hit above three times. One of those numbers has hit 9 times and therefore is way above expectation. The next best was one number hitting six times.
     
    Last edited: May 21, 2020 at 7:55 PM
    Denzie, TurboGenius and Anunnaki like this.
  7. TurboGenius

    TurboGenius Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2015
    Likes:
    946
    Occupation:
    Self proclaimed Theoretical Philosopher
    Location:
    Near Atlantic City New Jersey
    I have no idea why you keep saying this.
    I can run a session or any amount of sessions and it shows the same results - nothing near "irregular" at all.
    How you come up with that kind of result is beyond me.
    Of course every time I post my results (that I always do as I'm making a post) - I'm told that I hand picked that session.
    As if there's a need to do that ? There isn't.

    Here's one I'll run right now - does it matter ? Probably not, but again it shows the same predictable results -
    nothing "uncommon", nothing that isn't "regular" results. So let's see how it goes. (again).

    ==================================

    [​IMG]

    So we had 60 spots to fill, did they fill "randomly" ? or without being able to be predicted ? No.
    Only 11 numbers filled 60 spots.
    #9 appeared 17 times, #10 appeared 12 times - 1/2 of the possible spots were filled by only 2 numbers.
    Predictable ? You say no ?
    In the "matches" column - were there 0's once the data began flowing in ?
    I see a lot of 2's and 3's - a single 1, then 2's and 3's from then on.....
    You say this jumps all over the place and new numbers appear in these spots (would mean 0's).
    It doesn't happen, it can't happen. You can test this as many times as you'd like but saying these
    aren't predictable results is a blatant lie.
    Do all spots appear on average better than expected ? 1:37 ? Yes. By a lot !
    Do all spots appear on average better than the payout ? 35:1 ? Yes. By a lot !

    Given this info you still don't see the predictable results ? Or is is just trolling, I don't know.
    Do you think around spin 100 you could play 9,10,34 and win ? You would win a "shitload" of chips.
    Or you can pretend to not see the results, say it's not "common" and keep moving along.
    You decide.
     

  8. TurboGenius

    TurboGenius Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2015
    Likes:
    946
    Occupation:
    Self proclaimed Theoretical Philosopher
    Location:
    Near Atlantic City New Jersey
    It sure is.
    You'll see the 2's and 3's in the "matches" column, and no 0's........
    If you know what's not going to happen - you then know what is going to happen.
    Building a method based on something predictable and being right 100% of the time is the beauty of it all.
     
    Denzie, eugene and mr j like this.
  9. Denzie

    Denzie Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2019
    Likes:
    18
    Location:
    belgium
    Thx TurboGenius! Crystal clear... my first tests are winning flatbetting. Now put it on some steroïds to drag more chips my way. Thanks again !!!!!
     
    TurboGenius likes this.
  10. Rulet

    Rulet Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2019
    Likes:
    12
    Location:
    England
    Not Trolling,
    You mean 9,10,4
    I didn’t say it doesn’t win, doesn’t win all the time.
    Don’t want to argue with you anymore, let’s leave it at this.
    Forum users are clever enough to make up their own minds.
     
  11. TurboGenius

    TurboGenius Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2015
    Likes:
    946
    Occupation:
    Self proclaimed Theoretical Philosopher
    Location:
    Near Atlantic City New Jersey
    No, I mean 9,10,34 as I said.
    And there's never a need to argue - the facts which anyone can reproduce on their own speaks the truth.

    [​IMG]
     
  12. Rulet

    Rulet Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2019
    Likes:
    12
    Location:
    England
    At 17x spin 373 you are betting #9 or #10 or both, doesn’t matter just for examples sake, ok so far?
    Now, you miss the first #34 at 433 so according to what you say about not playing the top 3 numbers “that loses” you say, you drop 9 and/or 10 and start betting 34?
    Doesn’t make sense cos 9 and 10 keeps hitting, so you do play the top 3
    Gotcha
     
    Last edited: May 22, 2020 at 3:26 PM
  13. Naughty but nice

    Naughty but nice Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2019
    Likes:
    62
    Location:
    UK
  14. Naughty but nice

    Naughty but nice Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2019
    Likes:
    62
    Location:
    UK
    upload_2020-5-22_16-16-51.png
    upload_2020-5-22_16-17-30.png
    Has top 3 or even 4 revealed to be those that could go thru: the roof?
     

  15. Naughty but nice

    Naughty but nice Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2019
    Likes:
    62
    Location:
    UK
    upload_2020-5-22_16-46-33.png
    upload_2020-5-22_16-47-5.png
    Now I got bored with trying to get the Turb's results. But i might go back to testing.
     
    Last edited: May 22, 2020 at 4:48 PM
  16. Naughty but nice

    Naughty but nice Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2019
    Likes:
    62
    Location:
    UK
    Eugene or wiggy is the graph ok.
     
  17. Naughty but nice

    Naughty but nice Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2019
    Likes:
    62
    Location:
    UK
    Trying to break the 10'000; wondered if it would get there? Naughty prog some spins back.
    upload_2020-5-22_17-9-18.png
    upload_2020-5-22_17-10-39.png
     
  18. Naughty but nice

    Naughty but nice Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2019
    Likes:
    62
    Location:
    UK
    upload_2020-5-22_17-13-34.png
    Didn't like spins 231 to 271
     
  19. Naughty but nice

    Naughty but nice Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2019
    Likes:
    62
    Location:
    UK
    Did I use the time machine
     
  20. eugene

    eugene Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2016
    Likes:
    328
    Location:
    united kingdom
    230 spins = 6 cycles give or take a few spins and you have 4 numbers come up at twice the expected result.

    It looks like 8 numbers reaching expectation.
    16 numbers below expectation.
    12 above expectation.

    …and they say it's unpredictable!
     

Share This Page