TurboGenius Advantage of Repeaters explained - part 3 - 2020

Den what does the match's look like?
Here's 67 spins and meeting Smit's target of +100

 

I’d like to know too as that’s the way I have been testing.

 

Yes.

If we get a new leader b4 a hit... we now bet the new leader and keep our previous leader bet till he leaves our columnsssss. Mostly he still hit in the 2nd , 3th,.... once we got that hit we remove our bet on that previous leader . And remain with our current leader. Rince and repeat

Hope It's clear

 

Hi Denzie!!

An example please.....

Thanks!!

 

//?

 

Smit; Serg's #'s were hard try these.


Come good at the end

 

I did and already repllied to his original post.
I stopped at spin 89 cause I had already a profit of 179 units and didnt need to go any further.

But yes, they were hard with equal distribution (really slow game).

 

[QUOTE = "Smitridel, post: 96877, member: 6127"] No sé si Turbo respondió pero jugué tus giros.
Primero, ¿has establecido una meta de ganancias?
Si lo hace, mi objetivo de ganancias antes de restablecer mi seguimiento generalmente es de 100 unidades.

En ese marco, había ganado 179 unidades en el giro 89, (usando 1/5/25 en los mejores contendientes dentro de las tres columnas)
No hay necesidad de ir más allá: restablecería mi progresión o restablecería mi seguimiento.

Sin embargo, puedo ver por qué pones esa permanencia aquí ... Es difícil con los corredores lentos. [/ QUOTE]
hello smitridel.
Could you share the graph or the numbers bet?
I would like to see how you carry the game with the 3 numbers.

Thank you

 

LOL man
A master of vaddiTurboDysklexic like you wanting to see how I bet?
I've already given you the limit up to spin 89 and the profit goal (179 units) and the prog 1/5/25.
But since Im in sharing mood I'll tell you this: I didnt bet 3 numbers every spin. The bet selection was 1 number at first and build up.

Im sure that it wont be a problem for someone like you to reverse engineer the selection using your truly vast knowledge of the systems at hand and these ideas inside this very thread.

 

You see these are the things that I never share, because when I ask for simple nonsense nobody shares.
then people complain about me, but it is clear that everyone asks and nobody wants to give anything, then everything is complaints.
Now you know why I do not share in a forum, for things like these!
Take it easy sir, I don't need anything, I just wanted to see what you do, as I said, I discovered something in the disintegration law other than Turbo or at least he hasn't said anything.

greetings and thanks

 

You are mistaken.
I've shared everything I thought or how I played especially in this thread (I owe some spins to Denzie though which I need yo transcribe to text format).
Its clear that sarcasm does not get through google translate (or whatever you are using to be able to communicate in english).
I was being sarcastic to you.

So let me spell it out for you: All those years I've been following various roulette forums in which you are member you havent shared anything.
All you are saying and advertising are your ALLEDGED knowledge about these systems.

Its not a matter of me revealing the selection to you (which Im willing to do)
It was a test to see if you are capable to reverse engineer it using your Superior knowledge as you say, in which test you seem to fail.
If you cannot do that with so many data how dare you proclaim to have found out other riddles and systems much morr complex?

Its pretty clear that you dont know shit and leach other people for ideas.
Good for you.
This thread is full of ideas.
Use your head and find something valuable.

 

With progre 1/5/25 and one variant I get 427 units in spin 68.

Regards.

 

Of course I can see and identify what it does, I just have to start doing it, nothing more!
The only thing I wanted to tell you is that people ask for a lot and then they think they have discovered something important and changes everything.
They no longer ask, if not, now they ask you and you don't give because you think you have something good, that was the topic I was commenting on!
As I say, I don't need you to tell me anything, I just wanted to see what I've already seen many times, at a later time, you will surely ask for something and the same thing you have said will be said! that's all friend!

I hope it works out for you, I work a lot on this and I have many things clear, I keep working on this Turbo because I like to be entertained, not because I am desperate to find a way to win! I hope that is clear to you!

 

Quos
Have you tried against the supplied #'s in post 366 above. Quite tricky; came good in the end. Perhaps Serg can try them

 

I did it with one of the ideas published here and with the sergio numbers!!
It is the first time that I have tried such an aggressive progression. Normally I use smoother progressions ....... 1-2-4-8-16 .... even in one of the modalities that I test it is even smoother.

Turbo gave ideas in some video and CDN also in their explanations.

maybe we can make a skype group and present ideas

Regards!

 

Curve fitting ( Sir whatever likes this)

Personally i don't play with exact rules. Im watching whats happening at the moment. For example my session today i got a 5x and 4x within 37 spins. I won on it of course. But i saw how the rest was behaving. Rather slow ( many 1x). You could of course keep going (but thats risky with a positive progression. Flat its ok). My feeling told me this was not a average session . So here i take the profit and reset.

Also if we see the # come pretty stabil/equal i might get my hit and reset ( even im still few chips down).

Curve fitting.... I call it adapt to whats happening. Im not into the TROT but i do know the averages of what should be hitting anytime soon. Of course this is no solid written in stone kinda way but.....so far im winning and if it ain't broken.......

The positive progression....this is used to win when things is going great. It boost your session br so high you might win a few of them(or more). But MM is very important here. If your session BR is done...your done. Reset and start fresh. We should always have multiple BR for back to back to back losses. Basicly thats the casino way...you can add your wins to your br and next session bet bigger units...But at one point you'll hit table limit anyway. And of course the risk of 1 bad session take it all away.

Thats how i see it. If im wrong feel free to correct me.

 

Maybe TurboGenius might open a part 4... progression vs MM. ( just a suggestion). But Anyway lots of info here So....test test test

( i can't even code my way of playing with all this curve fitting )

 

Everybody has his/her own MM and profit goals.
Its not curve fitting per se, I would rather call it prudent gambling (now THAT is an oxymoron!).

About averages.
I've tested thousands of spins and played hundreds of those.
One thing I know for sure.
RNG has much more statistical imbalances regarding averages than the real wheel.
I even used a raindrop inspired method using averages in the past (track 37 spins, target a specific group of unhit etc) but watch out for RNG. Just saying

There are multiple ways of locking in profits (lowering down progression) even if you are in the negative but winning.
I always thought that MM is even more important than progression or even selection because the gambling disease lies exactly in that idea and casinos will do anything to push you into that state of mind.

 

Yes, yes its clear as daylight.

By all means, please continue making billions but keep an eye on these forums in case something "fun" or entertaining comes up.

 

Are you Azim ? ( some Azim mailed me)