TurboGenius Advantage of Repeaters explained - part 3 - 2020

I also play for real money, not simulation!
The vast majority of real and air roulette works, but let me tell you that in software I have already failed a few times or at least my bankroll cannot stand it!
It is very nice in rx, r-s, etc, because there is no mapping of the game!

I just wanted to say my personal results!

Even knowing how to handle money well, as Turbo explains huh ...
regards

 

Think Denzie mentioned, numbers that drop from your top performers. Turbo, said some drop out and others drop in. But are the numbers to bet; the Known performers, keeping you in the game; so, when the sweet spot starts you have the contenders!!


The question is, do the top performers, start to lose for a cycle and do your lower contenders start to step up?


The contenders, look like they’re doing the job. Does this happen all the time?


Was #11 earning his money after spin 21? Ask the same of #25.

Are #’s 7-9-11 getting to the sweet spot?

Spin 154 you have 11 contenders.

As the cycles, go by, will the contenders grow? Here 154 spins, how many more would you have by spin 500?

And would you still be playing for 500 spins?

 

There is something important that you all overlook, I think, and I will also contribute a little.
Turbo, talks about how to handle progressions.
each number carries a personal Turn Count, but is also a set of numbers.
if our maximum bet is 3 numbers, we should not raise the chip when it loses 36, because that would be for an individual number, but for a set of 3 numbers, it should be 108, therefore if your bet loses 36 or more, no you have to raise the value of the chip, you just have to wait for it to make you lose approximately 108 to increase the set to 5 chips.
The same happens with the value of a chip of 5, you will only increase when with chips of 5 among the 3 they lose 540 chips and so on ...
because in the end you are playing with an average of 3 numbers, although you can justify it to 2, which would be 72 chips.
I don't know if they will understand me because the translations are bad.
but it is something that will open your mind more to improve or at least I do it with this intention.
I am willing to speak to the people who are working on Turbo for a group benefit.

regards

 

I don't mind showing Bago or anyone else viewing that Turbo's ideas work where it really matters. I was going to play online anyway come July rather than be a human guinea pig what with all the new safety measures that will be in place at the Casinos.

I agree with what Smitridel said above in one of his posts. IMO, this is probably one of the best threads in a very long time on any roulette message board. There is so much valuable, insightful and helpful info all in the one place.

 

It would be interesting that those of us who are working a lot on the topic of turbo did not get in touch to exchange opinions and ways as we do, to find the smallest way to play and spend chips.
For my part, if someone wants to do it, I signed up.
but I only sign up with people who are really working seriously, like Eugene, CDN, smitridel ...

regards

 

Nice looking charts Notto. It’s all about finding that sweet spot!

 

Hi Smitridel

Thanks for sharing your losing session last week. I thought I would put your numbers into a table to see if anything stood out.

Green cells and red cells.

Green cell: A green cell is used if a number repeats within 35 spins. For example, row 1 column 1; number six appears at first spin. Number six repeats again at spin 32. This is within the 35-spin time frame. The cell is marked green.

Red cell. A red cell is used if the number does not repeat in 35 spins. For example, row 1 column 2; number ten appears at second spin. Number 10 repeats at spin 50. This is greater than the 35-spin time frame. The cell is marked red.



In the table, 13 different numbers occupy a possible 34 locations. 6, 10, 5, 15, 9, 29, 11, 36, 28, 3, 8, 22, 2. This is actually quite high. The method is most effective when there are fewer numbers dominating. Turbo’s charts were showing 12 numbers occupying 60 places in the chart.

Despite this, the chart still shows that on 20 occasions, a number which appeared in one of the top three columns repeated within 35 spins. While only 11 numbers which appeared in one of the top three columns did not repeat with 35 spins.

In summary, the data confirms it was a difficult session with too many numbers appearing in the chart. However, the winning numbers (green cells) still outnumbered the losing numbers (red cells).

 

Hi guys!
I started testing so well, and then I got sick, so I couldn't do the tests for 2 weeks.
Thanks to everyone who writes and shares their ideas. And to be honest, there are already so many of them that I don't even know exactly what to try to test. I also thought a lot about the СDN post, to which Turbo indicated that this is an excellent post. But now he is different from his last posts. Anyway, thanks to СDN for sharing. And I'll start by thinking in order, by testing his last posts. I've already looked at something, and a number of questions.
For example, two consecutive numbers appeared in the column. We bet on that number. But then in this column the numbers will fall only 1 time in a row, which does not allow you to change the number in this column, and the number that we bet on did not fall about 150 spins. And there are questions with the transition of the number we bet on, from one column to another, but only once. Yes, now there are a lot of things, and not much is clear. Because many people share their thoughts, and they are different for everyone. And who succeeds, only give hints and not so few specifics. Although I understand them, this is normal. But this is even more annoying, without offense.

P.S. Please look at these numbers in 270 spins from the real roulette wheel. Numbers, and spins in brackets. Does anyone get to win these 270 rotations with these numbers? Thanks.

 

Jono 8 contenders

 

The clash comes to mind; should I stay or should I go?
Still 8 contenders

 

10 contenders; rode the wave

 

The charts look great Notto. You’re tracking the top 8 numbers? How many of them are you betting?

 

Thank you for your effort in validating the session.
How would you played this?
I mean, flat bet?

Im gonna share another real money (losing session) today and Im starting to notice some patterns that seem to be the Achilles Heel of this method.

I know that flat bet during these sessions would return minimal to no profit (were talking about hours playing here) and once you add even a 2step progression like CDN suggested you run into the probability that a number goes cold(er).
I think you mentioned somewhere that you raise 1 unit if you win but not in profit?

Im still trying to figure out how to go on flat betting and make 2 hours of playing worthwhile.

 

Platton, have you got the 270 spins and post them.

 

Hi Smitridel

I’m still trying to work out how to play it. The method I was testing earlier this week is not the way.
As Ricky said, perhaps it’s best to accept the occasional loss. Focussing on the hottest numbers you will win more than you lose.

I agree with you about progressions. They can occasionally save you, but they can also accelerate the losses.

Perhaps just concentrate on the top two places?

 

Ok here it goes - this was inspired by CDNs analysis.


Last night, after 2 hours of playing and many ups and downs in the BR, I got away with -250 units loss. I did manage to get even at the middle of the session but I kept going.
Platform: SPEED AUTO ROULETTE Live Vegas (Video Feed) - 209 players playing by platform Evolution Gaming.

Bet Selection: A number must have repeated inside it's respective column (A,B,C) - not 2 times at a row, just to be +1 from all the rest in its column. If you had two of those inside, replace with the newest.

Progression: 2 step 1-5 -on a hit reset to 1.
The progression would apply even if the number selected wasnt on top 3, provided you didnt have anything else to replace it with.
Max numbers played: 3.

I know that in that session I made one grave mistake somewhere in the middle of the session, in which I didnt raise #0 (per the rules) to 5 and lost the chance to get ahead (two successive #0)
The rest of the session was done by the book as described above and didnt manage to get even.

You will also find attached the 3 column set as constructed up to 10x.
Slow session again - 255 spins only 10x.

 

Hi Platton, I’d like to put your numbers in a chart. Every time I chart a set of results, it reveals something.

When I opened your text file, there weren’t 270 spins. Do you have the complete set of spins you can post?

Thanks

 

UPDATE: Replaying my session FLAT bet I would have made my +100 profit goal almost in half an hour.
I tried Jono's way (3 numbers betting rotating per 35 spins) or even the simplest way build up to three contenders and once 1 had break though continue building up to the next level.

F*ck Im so angry at myself. Im a progression junkie, I cant help it.

Anyway.

 

Smit; +165, spin 67 and if carry on next spin another win.

 

Yep, sorry guys. There was only table. Here is the numbers.