Discussion in 'TurboGenius's Forum' started by TurboGenius, Mar 27, 2020.
The above, no riddles. Work on it, don't make it complicated
If I may add something to @Naughty but nice post:
You can even try keeping all top performers of only the 1st(the first to go to 1 to 2 to 3 etc) and up the progression accordingly.
OR you can even categorize them betting the first performers of each dozen.
Progression wise even Marty would work and I would only up on a miss on the new top performer to make up for the lack of prediction accuracy (goes along to what Turbo once said).
Tried all scenarios in the past both live and testing.
However can you find this whole concepts (any way of this thread) Achilles heel?
so we all came to the conclusion no amount of money will change the houses edge
we all believe tampering with amount bet per session results in a larger swings and ultimately a loss
so what i have for you system lovers and its a good one you will like it i tested it!
wait for 8 to 10 spins
look for a sleeper 6 of the (1-6)(7-12) so on and so forth
once you see the non hit on the 6 bet it, bet straight up 6 chips on 6 spots
do a shorrt lived martingale
that is it, managed to work up to 6250$ betting 30$ a spin from a starting 1k$ roll
now go get em!
To anyone who tests this and wants to post :
"I bet the top 3 numbers at all times and it lost !!" - please do a little bit of thinking first.
Playing just the lead number, or playing all 3 of the top 3 numbers all the time WILL not work.
You're going to figure out how to do it though and then you can either keep it to yourself or not.
If you need to use a negative progression, or you're betting all 3 every spin - you are doing it wrong.
I just wanted to throw that in because I already see a post coming with the quote I used above.
Make predictions and select your numbers properly.
Is the above contradictory?
When the 5x performers are known, would you not start to bet them?
As you are betting these numbers, you win with 6x. Then the 7x,8x etc.
What about your cycles then?
Remember the old riddle, take 3000 to win 3000.
On the graph above spin 181 does not show as a win; because i forgot to add this number and would have gone thru the 4000; which would be enough to stop.
As you don't know how selecting the numbers.
But, I'm shown which to bet, be it sometimes more than I would like.
If, you work in a cycle, perhaps you might see how I picked the numbers.
Chips could code it in 10 minutes.
Plenty of opportunities to take a win. Like Eugene said take some units and reset.
I have rheumatoid arthritis; It effects my eyes and I've got to stop.
Take what you can from the above.
Think what repeats do in 40 spins.
Did you still use gradually increased stakes in this last session?
There are many ways to do it, but you do not always win, you will win more sessions than you lose, but all you have to do is put a stop is the ones that lose, but it is not a way to win each session! I already warn you, I have worked a lot and I have done really good things with Turbo, I don't even know if they are Turbo or things that I have seen with everything I learned from him, but he does not win all the sessions!
If I can, soon, I will say a way that works quite well or upload a video from my channel and you see it clearly!
Yeah I dont expect to win every session, just looking for consistent way, not necessarily spending 500 spins at the wheel. What's your channel Sergio?
Eugene had proposed a way to stop adding new numbers.
I also found the specific post contradictory.
The only way is to define a stop count for contenders (up to 4 lets say) and start hunting for a specific phenomenon which I must admit does not happen very often.
The phenomenon refers to a number that would become +2 from the rest of the "contenders".
My conclusion: Flat bet it wont work due to the rare appearance of that occasion and due to the drawdown caused by you betting all "contenders" HOPING to catch a +2.
I don't know if anyone noticed, but it happens quite a lot that once a repeat hits to occupy one of the spots in "our table" the next number usually comes very quickly within few spins. We could try to exploit that, giving smaller exposure and still a good win frequency. Now I think that works better in early stages rather than when you are 15x+, as my spin file in other thread shows a very poor run once you get to 18x there is a huge number of spins before 19x comes in.
Circled where we would win if betting 6 spins after new number shows up in table and only the numbers that can fill in the next free spot. So for example:
Spin 8 is 32, so we bet 1u on 32,6,17,8
we win on Spin 10 (+28 balance)
we keep betting then 32,6,17,8 until spin 14 where 11 hits (+12 br)
Spin 15 to 17 bet 32,6,17,8, 11
Win on spin 17 (+33 br)
Now we bet 32,17,11,6 for 6 more spins all losing so br=+9
Then wait until next number shows in new row.
Spin 30 shows no11, so we back 32,17,11,6 on next spin (+5)
7 shows up so next spin 32,17,11,6,7, we win (+36br)
Next six spins 32,17,11,6,7 we get a hit on spin 37 (+52 br)
Row is completed so back to just four numbers 11,7,32,17... next win on spin 40 and so on...
Question when its best to stop or how many spins after new repeat shows to bet (positive progression attack could give nice profit), only testing can show, unless finally Turbo comes back or Bitrock and give some more information.
Separate names with a comma.