TurboGenius Advantage of Repeaters explained - part 3 - 2020

Jekhb lost a lot more than £10 more like £1200
I think he played 1,3,9 progression

 

Eugene it may be worth it to reread the beginning of this thread 3. it is enough infos to give you a winner.
Rinad

 

Apart from the 1st place horse, there are always about 7-10 horses to choose from for the 2nd and 3rd horses.

 

Thanks Rinad, I read most of the threads again over the last few weeks and you are right, this is the one where I had the eureka moment. I think one of the reasons I didn't get it before is because my own personal method is very much based on a next spin philosophy. In other words, I have a target number and I get one shot at it, if I fail, it's back to evaluating the situation. So it was very hard to understand something which in some ways is the complete opposite of my own strategy. That's why like I said, now that I actually get it, i really appreciate Turbo's work.

 

Ok here I am conducting an experiment.
35 spins in, I have 5 3peaters and no hits yet. Bankroll at minus 56

 

46 spins in I have 8 3peaters no hits
Bankroll minus 124.
Already in the hole, flat betting, good luck.

 

I don’t want to bore people with images and charts but where’s the dominant horse? This trend can and does continue on a regular basis.
Now you can cherry pick your winning sessions and talk about your great method, yes those sessions do happen and you can win easy money but what I have posted above happens on a regular basis too.

 

By the way, I couldn’t have wished for a better session from RS, you see, you might say , those sessions are not very common.
Wrong, they happen more than the sessions the author of this thread talks about.

 

Spin 56
Balance minus 195
10 3peaters, no 4th repeat yet!

 

Nobody can know which specific number will be the dominant horse.

I would immediately stop betting.
Wait for a number that has hit 3 times (F3) to hit 4 times (F4) this would be the dominant horse, then bet all F3 expecting one of them to become F4. When an F5 occurs, bet all F4 expecting one of them to become F5. Same idea for F6, etc, etc.

Hope this helps.
Best Regards,

 

Eugene
The count or trot; if you keep the score of the repeats, there's an average for the repeats. Funny how many times 60 spins ends with 30 of the starting 37 hitting, so you must of had 30 repeats.
How many repeats is usual for 20 spins, keep in mind how the non-hit are showing, find the prog for those early spins; you'll need it on R-sim as it throws non-hits out fast; like Huskerdu said sometimes there's only 2 repeats in 20 spins. This would mean to me that repeats are down by 2.

 

Hello Naughty/Notto, that's a lot of work you did there! One thing nowadays is that there are loads of goods stats out there like what you and others provide. It's funny you say that about the R-sim because I noticed as well when I used to go on it a lot that the repeats were often slow in coming when compared to either my B+M scorecards, R-extreme or random.org and yet Turbo still managed to smash it.

 

One thing I noticed a lot years ago was how in that second cycle of spins from spin 37 to 74, you would get a lot of the non hits coming in a bunch towards the end of the cycle and what you were left with would be the 3 or 4 sleepers which could be cold for ages. When you think about how random Roulette is supposed to be, it's amazing how there is a kind of framework/blueprint that it regularly follows give or take a few spins here and there.

 

Just done this on R-sim


Sorry about the gap.

 

you and me both my friend. I would never play over the 10x mark and always exit before with a profit and start all over again.you cant just play the 3 top horses for ever just by looking at which horse has the most hits. not saying it cant work long term, but to come out a winner every session it wont work. Rinad

 

I don’t buy it, am I to believe what I see in my tests or other people’s testimonies?
Top performing Numbers change a lot more than what the author suggests.
I am not talking about top 3, you can go upto 12, whatever.
You only need one bad session to wipe you out

 

Numbers don’t necessarily get to 10x by 160-185 spins, I have seen dreadful sessions whereby the highest is 6x within that spin range

 

Take the progression out of your system, it loses, “All day long” as they say in the US

 

Rulet I think you'r playing way too many numbers .

 

This is a recent post by CHT, someone who defended the author of this post on the other forum few years back,


To huskerdu et al,

Repeaters don't work, confirmed.
Read gamblingforums where you find that this fact is stated by the staunchest supporters of repeaters. Few months ago.

Repeaters and sleepers don't work.
I wrote a long list of systems strategies that don't work. Fact.
Read the list.

You can bang your head on the wall or learn what don't work, try something else. Help yourself without wasting your money and life.
I make this post for your(newcomers) benefit.

***because of this post Steve and the mathboys will mock my post. No response.