TurboGenius Advantage of Repeaters explained - part 3 - 2020

Nope...

37 nrs x 1 = a gap of 37

I dont think you grasp the calculation but thats ok a lot of people dont.

say 1 nr doesnt appear for 100 spins is exactly the same as 2nrs not appearing for 50 spins, they cost the same, they appear the same, all the way to 36.

 

So playing what happens most of the time. Below betting 1 slot at a time and flat bet each session. Value can go up if it gets boring, see spin 560. Change horse rather sooner then later. Take a look at Turbo’s balances of r-sim what do you see? Short or long sessions?


When numbers sleep for a long time, what do you do with you’re horses? For example you got multiple 2x, 3x etc. Which one you gonna bet. Turbo has mentioned it in one of his topics. If you only run simulations you cannot see it.
Turbo and denzie once said bring 1000 to win 1000, i believe this is only with 5-25-100 positive progression. If you play with chips of 1 don’t expect 1000’s, i know 175-250 is good. Playing 8 hours it’s a long time.
Turbo posted a Tedx video of that austaurian mathematics professor he explained the big gaps.

 

4 leader changes is common, seen 6-7 couple of times but rare.
Most common exact repeats number in a lap is 2 - 50%, full house so 3 repeats around 26%, so we can expect at least 2 numbers repeating in next lap in 75-76% of laps played or at least 1 number being new in next lap also around 75%.

Gaps between hits expand the longer we play, so even though we can expect 2 numbers to repeat from previous lap the wait might be longer later on, hence I prefer to stop before 200 spins, preferably before 3 cycles end so 111 spins as that is usually by when you can get most hits in unless its a bad session.

I guess our chances of not repeating numbers from previous lap increase as more numbers join the leaders, so maybe thats when we should switch to playing for a new number to show in top 3.

Lets say:
4x has 12, 23, 14, 16
Next two spins 12 and 14 hit so we have
5x 12, 14
Would you still play 23 or rather 16 since stats show its more likely to have 1 number being new next lap than a full house of 3 repeats?

 

So I bet all slots, no calculation, you say a gap of 37. Ok carry on then

 

In my view it depends on how 1x2x3x shows, is 12 coming from above or from the right. Same for the other numbers.

 

One question though . Bank roll required . Or is it just testing ?

 

I would say 300/400. When I have build up my BR enough, I up the value of my chips.

 

Thanks for the reply .

 

I know it doesn’t mean anything. Not showing off, just to encourage.

 

When playing and still in the green I don’t mind that my BR drops half or more.

 

6th-sense has also some nice ideas.

 

Something to twist you’re head around.


Just any EC, numbers out numbers in.

 

When zero shows up I play it with value 1 until a designated boundary. Who knows maybe it shows 6x in 2 hours.

 

OK, you're right if you look at it that way. 10 is the correct answer. But 4 is really to low....

 

Why accumulated?

so 16 is 1x at spin 23, then at 3x 22 is the leader. According to you gap is 32? Oh boy
Was it on a treadmill for 15 spins.

 

I would say 34, if I understand him correctly. 16 last appeared in the 1st column at spin 33, was replaced by 22 at 4x and repeated at 5x spin 67.

 

When I ran it in on rx, I saw 104 because of leader change out. That was from hit to hit playing top 3. It only happen one time, there were several more in the 70's and 80's. Couldn't figure out when not to bet and avoid those extremes.

 

But what about if you started right from the moment you've got 3 numbers to fill in our 1x columns? ( If I read correctly you started counting AFTER a hit)

That's the reason I'm asking these questions to compare data...seems we've all got different extreme gaps ... not that one should play the extremes because the waiting could take waaaaaaay to long to place that first bet

 

No matter how your perspective is there is nothing in it. Knowing the max gap doesn’t matter it’s a losing bet. You can’t make something profitable with this variable. Therefore you need boundaries, then bet one or more qualifying horse(s) within those boundaries. Don’t bet every qualifying horse, if you only focus on the leader you’re missing out on new possibilities. ‘Never bet on the last of something’ and ‘law of thirds’ think about it. Running in RX doesn’t work, you need the visibility of numbers coming out. Roulette is a game of balance, numbers go up and down. Only chance you have is to change lanes on time, numbers are not connected. So max gap could be 1 or +(I don’t care).
The story of Turbo about he saw someone winning 3 times in a few spins is not luck. He’s only right on time.
It’s not a walk in the park in a real B&M.