TurboGenius Advantage of Repeaters explained - part 3 - 2020

Multiple games played. I coded the information into Rx and have run more games than anything I have ever tested. Profit each anf every time.

 

Look at the chart, there was always a number in play from spin two until the end. No gaps, constant play.

Like I posted before works really well for Pick 3 lotteries too.

 

There are people who aren't posting anymore. Some found what they were looking for and some know what to do with such info.

 

With or without a progression? If not and you coded it in rx, that would be pretty impressive. But be fair in calculation for example 1000 spins in rx and 100 spins "played" with a profit. is still 100 spins REALLY played

 

Point is they were sort of bragging. (which is fine) Continuously posting how great their winnings were. Than months later poof they are gone. And never heard from again. A lot of us asked what happened to them, asked them personally none replied, never. Makes you think, dont you agree?

Would it be to much to asked just to say hello, yes i'm still here and winning big?

 

As I have posted in the past. I test with real money so that my results are always consistent. And yes really played equals really played.

The chart is an extrapulation of what games do become. The logic dictates the flow. I did not play that game for real, anyone that sits and plays for 2700 spins straight has bigger problems than trying to figure out roulette.


If you look at the last chart Turbo posted it literally shows which numbers will become hot next and if you chart enough games you know when they will too.

 

It doesn't make me think, I already know.

 

Do not try to make sense man.
They just talk theory and cherry picking sessions.

 

I agree completely, don't spend another moment on it. A simple resolution to the problem.
People who are convinced that it doesn't mean anything will be happy, people who
know otherwise will be happy. Problem solved.

 

Taken out of the context .. but reminds me of Turbo's image posted on the strategic placement around a number .. some type of star .. something like these.



So using top 3 would look like a bit different, plowing the way till top3s actually hit;
.. but not straightaway .. eg. once a top3 hit is insufficient to close the game in positive,
or if you prefer a new high.

 

Hello, Nimo, how are you?
I sent you a message by email, but I see that you don't want to answer me...
Well, as you said in an old message, it is not necessary to reach x100 or x10, the first 111-120 balls are enough to win playing flat.

 

Another thing .. I am looking at this image here



Some might remember Vaddi -- & I am mentioning this name just to access that part of your brain, revive those once active brain cells, cell connections .. those wiring being bridged over --

.. he introduced the concept of once in the recovery, after the initial 7-8 spins .. whatever the magic number is .. if no-hit extend the number of numbers played per spin, & on hit, if not yet positive, reduce the number of numbers played --

essentially, in his words, when the game is telling you your bet selection is accurate reduce .. & vice versa,

.

There's no spin count accompanying this data, so I am gonna go according to it only:

row two shows that only 1/topt, or similarly in the resulting exposition amount playing flat, given that you would be starting with three, 0/top3 -- so the game is in minus

let's skip, for now, the possible impact of the above post .. where you'd start applying somewhere in the ½ or ⅔ of the 37-spin cycle, due to adding the number of positions as they come in, becoming eligible upon the repeat qualifier as the session unfolds ..

tracking top5 & starting with top3, you'd now INCREASE the number of numbers played, expand the net, to more horses -- with this is already implied higher cost & thus two or more hits to the positive .. so a type of divisor

.

row three shows -- 2/top3, 2/top4, 3/top5 -- but that numbers 10, & especoally 28 seem to early

.. after those hits, contingent on the exposition, you might as well reduce the topX amount of numbers played
.. & if exposition-wise very nearby the any of topX hit to positive, apply the 'star' .. for one of those hit early bringing you into the closing range
.. where you'd reduce to that topX amount only, for that hit to bring you to a new high
.. for as long as the game still qualifies as requiring only that hit to finish
.. otherwise, expand again to star, & if necessary to a higher topX amount

.

kind of like breathing, letting the variance & exposition tell, how deep & how wide

.

figuratively;

its like you'd be playing a street position for 11x spins .. & once reaching (-11) ..
pair it with a DS position for another few spins .. getting the effect of the star
.. if DS hits .. you switch back to the ST-only till (-11)
.. if both hit, you are out, restart
.. if going beyond those spins .. add another ST .. to get the effect of increasing the topX

once exposition is reduced upon hit, adjust appropriately

≈ same here, only you utilizing the su numbers all along the way

you could even start as the above .. & transition to su later,
as it costs you far less per spin with exposition increasing at much lower rate

.

bottom line

• expanding/reducing coverage
• adjusting according to the exposition vs new high
• let the factor that is out of your direct control = variance .. tell you what & how, utilizing that facor in your favor too

 

As I have hardly ever contributed anything, today I will contribute something that will open your eyes a lot or so I hope for the good of many of you.
The behavior of the horse analogy is always the same, always the same thing happens.


When a horse comes out with a lot of energy and is a clear leader, it cannot be eternal, the horse gets tired and others that come with a more stable and slow pace end up making things difficult for the leading horse or even overtake it and win the race. race...
And when everyone comes out with the same steady rhythm,
thinking about making an effort and giving everything at the end of the race, there are always 1-2 horses that are more physically prepared to unbalance the race and win the race in the last stretch...

What would you do in each situation?
Is there a solution for both cases?

With this I leave you my grain of sand and I hope I can help all those who have been fighting for years!

Cheers

 

& finally;



here you have classification on dozens, another clue Turbo is giving you .. offering on the platter

as you know the temporary cohesion before it fizzles out of which you get an i dication of with the spin outcome (something @gizmotron is telling you also all along, however, linked to EC district in his case)

.. so why don't you run the track of eg. two topX for rach dozen, & abstain from wasting units on the quiescent dozen (something @mr j is also stressing pit continuously, but in his case applied to 2-4 numbers), only resuming tgose qualified position on its appearance

so you have XXY-type trigger for two dozens in last three spins .. & XYZ -- adjust appropriately

 

Just some ideas .. thrown in there into the mix.

Put the puzzle pieces together.

 

& calibrate them in sync properly.

It might not seem much, but every little detail in the whole,
adds up having repercussions working against you or in your favor.

 

& finally, on this level;

Formula 1 team prepares their already top car, refining & optimizing it for each race, each track

Variance is an alive thing .. be one with it, let it be one with your system .. adjust with it.

 

Have your system ready for wet & dry track .. adjust.

 

And I believe the turbo passed all the pieces of the puzzle!
About the race and the leadership I believe it is clear for anyone to see.
He also taught about progression, and there is also a bit of experience and testing.
And I never follow more than 3 numbers, and most of the time it's just 2 numbers.