TurboGenius Advantage of Repeaters explained - part 3 - 2020

There is no need to create any proof.
Any method can be tested very easily and it is up to each individual to prove if it works or not.
Can you point the thread on Roulettelife?

 

Man, hope u can learn how to read correctly.

Cheers

 

Luckyfella,

Thanks for your reply.

Really i already read about your post in here and other forum although not all your post because in other i hard to find your post not like this forum.

Already read about 2nd LoTD too.

And i know you choose 18 number + 1 zero.

But i am still not correct 100 percent guessing when you place the bet and what to bet.

Sometimes correct but sometimes still wrong.

So i conclude i still cannot full complete understand how you play.

But still thanks for your input. Because i like the flat bet style. I am very curious how can make profit with flat bet.

Hope i can understand how you play one day.

Oh btw what do you mean RRBB ?

Red Red Black Black ?

 

Flatbetting 5k spins

 

Statistically relevant on a 3 sigma basis you need more than 50k bets not spins.

Have fun (or program it)

 

No clue how to code

 

Looks good.

 

Give me an example then how do you read?

 

Right to left obviously lol

 

Lol

 

What's the highest anyone has gone to get a 3 out of 3 in matches? as in x2 x3 x4 x5 repeats?

 

I was playing a roulette simulator online playing for pennies and got the below

x3 10-11-35 0 out of 3
x4 25-17-19 2 out of 3
x5 19-01-25 1 out of 3
x6 19-34-16 1 out of 3
x7 21-13-19 1 out of 3
x8 21-17-10 1 out of 3
x9 21-34-33 2 out of 3
x10 21-33-10 2 out of 3
x11 21-19-33 3 out of 3
x12 21-19-33

First 3 out of 3 came on 288 spins

 

Shanks up the hammers

 

Yes but...
You would be rocking in that session if you would just pressed on for the leader to remain unchanged with each..lap, especially from 7x to 11x.

 

That's true and i was betting both for the leading number and for the 3 out of 3 so still ended up a few pennies but hadn't had it take so long to get 3 out of 3 before.

 

We'll leave it to you and the Gooners to fight it out for 5th next season

Hope all well

 

getting by shanks.
The Gullivans need to do some spending

 

Actually you need to breakthrough about five standard deviations. Three standard deviations with a poorly defined bet isn't good enough. The good news is you don't have to test for 50k bets. If your system really worked, then you could break through in under five thousand spins. But...there's no chance of your system working if it's based on the law of the third nonsense or the GUT junk.

 

Before you even begin testing, state why the method should work. Form a hypothesis, form a prediction, then test.

When testing you must very carefully define your bet selection in order to prevent unintentional curve fitting of the data. Otherwise you'll end up in fooling yourself like Notto has.

 

So your first leading numbers throughout the whole session were 21 19 33?

I always thought that the 1 2 3 out of three were relative to the previous lap.
Which would also mean that you were constantly betting 3 numbers, correct?