TurboGenius Advantage of Repeaters explained - part 3 - 2020

I prefer this way to see how the numbers come together and separate.
3 horses, 5, 9
Dozens.
Are we talking about the same thing?
Ricardo

 

No hay variaciones Gigi666 cuando lo tengas veras que no falla y tampoco necesitaras una mega progresion.

 

Yep. Round and round we go. I put those questions out there, with data, so all the lurkers would see the truth. This is the truth of what's going on.

The truth will only be revealed to you when the tooth fairy flies by and farts in your face sprinkling fairy dust. Until then you will need to just keep at it.

Searching, always searching. For what? No one knows, but just keep looking because you're only 2 feet from that unknown thing you're looking for.

I enjoy data analysis, I guess these guys just enjoy fucking with people. To each their own.

No hay nada Yoigo. Niente, nichts.

 

Si en tu mente piensas y estás convencido de que no hay nada, ¿adivina qué? No habrá nada.
Pero es tú mente no es la mía ni la de Nimo ni Hal ni Denzie ni otros que seguro lo tienen.
Animo amigo.

 

That's not what i said. I never said I'm convinced there's nothing. I said there's nothing, as you have nothing. You are perpetuating the hunt for some unknown thing that's apparently simple in mechanism but hard to see and you're not allowed to code it and the only way to see it is to use a progression and keep at it until one day in the distant future when mountain dew comacho is president of the United States will we finally understand it.

When I said there's nothing, I meant you have nothing.

It's not that our brains are different than all these other people that (supposedly) have it.

I mean really, the fucking arrogance of that implication. You don't have it because your mind isn't like the others.

I'm not upset that I don't have a solution to this. I enjoy analysis as I said. I'm just here calling all you guys out on your bullshit.

Providing data and saying show me. Point to it.

And its silent when I said pointed questions. The people with answers disappear, because they don't have any answers. Nothing to even point in a direction. Its not like im asking for the secret sauce.

Just like all the ones in this thread, they disappeared because they all figured it out and there was never any reason to come back...

 

Funny, to much work! Some years ago.

 

S

Vuelvo a lo mismo,si para tí no tengo nada ok descansa feliz por que no tengo nada .
Nada que pueda compartir contigo.

 

Thank you for posting this

 

I have been where you are right now. Your upload and mine are the same.

 

I noticed that. Interesting.

 

I've been trying different formats of "top3 as top1" and I think it may mean that we have to play top3 until we have another top3 or until we have 3 more of the same line of play x.
The other variants that I tried, do not end up working correctly.

Anyway, I put a way that I created a while ago based on Turbo Genius and nobody has paid much attention to it, but try it and you will see that it gives very good results. The best results are with a number and when the second one of the same line comes out, release it and wait for the next level and repeat the process, with this we will have a large betting margin to achieve winning. I use aggressive progression.
It also works well with 2 and the third one stops or when the next level wins.
With three it starts to become more difficult to manage the box, although it can also be achieved.

 

Im not starting that debate with you again.

Point was that compared to a random stream there was no difference according to turbo it has.

 

+96 as 4 units short take the win


Sergio stream longer as the 1x just filled making 2x take longer. Then 3x come into play and there it is 4x

Sergio they'll just keep trying different ways. Not using the excellent excel Turbo posted which Rheti re-posted

 

Sergio, to0 some it looks a disarster.
Repeats played as should even thou not our numbers. At spin10; 1 repeat. Spin 20; 4 repeats. 88 units down, fair. Spin 30 have 9 repeats. So, 0-0-0. Now 40 spins repeats are -1, only had 15; not the average 16. You can see 1 of our numbers repeats at spin 42.
Okay, at 60 spins repeats are still -1 to0 the average. repeats 29 to 31 non-hits(1x). It's even a win on spin 60, but D-D is still showing heading south as the DSSA tosser would say.
But you can see a profit of 462. Just using TOP3.
6 laps has matches of 0-0-1-1-2. 7x has 2 matches and 8x has 1 match.

 

Here you go Naughty but nice, flat bet max at 6x and reset. There are total 5 session together top3! . If the run was fast also stop on the first win.

 

Apples vs oranges I say. What you calculated has nothing to do with roulette, it’s just a calculation.
1/400 and 10000 cycles 1/38 divided by 10010, if I take 1 Coca Cola bottle and mix it with 100 bottles water it ain’t Coca Cola anymore.

 

We are not talking about the same thing here. Turbo was talking about numbers that were behind. Those numbers will have hits below 1:37 to "compensate" his words not mine.

All I did was take these numbers (behind on average 155 spins) compare them with a random stream. And there was not one iota difference. You can extent the streams to (after starting) 10 spins 100 spins 1000 10000 they both yield the same results.

So according to you there will be a difference?

 

I get that we've done similar analysis, but it still comes back to my original point of what you're supposed to be looking for. Its relatable but ultimately not helpful.

And if this isn't the correct view then what is? Why did you block those numbers off in your picture?

Again, I've seen nothing different than random and I don't think anyone else here has either.

 

You're wrong mate sorry to say

 

Why?