TurboGenius Advantage of Repeaters explained - part 4 - 2021

In long; because the demonstration itself puts you & all of your hard work at a shoes disadvantage .. now imagine everyone having excellent telepathy skill by default just like everyone can tie shoes (& some without even looking at, lol) .. would demonstrating precognition still interest anyone then, or would the interest cease altogether? .. I guess then everyone would be asking to demonstrate how to lie & still no getting caught or perceived? The answers in the shift of STATUS QUO & the evolution of paradigm in which your work you worked so hard for wouldnbe simply overridden & back to the square one.

In short; can you patent it? NO.

The rest is obvious.

 

There have been many successful demonstrations over the years.

Why don't you jump back on MPR and fire up your #1 position and play another 500 lousy spins? Chicken..

 

Y

Correction, you haven't seen one. That doesn't mean that others haven't.

 

ever heard of well kept secrets ?

 

LMAO .... the things we read here

 

lol I am glad everyone is a winner here.

 

Private demonstrations have been shared repeatedly among a small group that trusts each other. Several this year particularly as people have sought to help family members and others impacted by employment disruption due to the pandemic.

No one is asking you, or anyone else to “believe”. Far from it. Instead, my own advice is simply to continue to test theories, continue to read what has already been written, and apply new concepts. As Lucky mentioned, it can take a while, treat it as a fun hobby and chase every lead. It’s out there, up to each of you to find your own particular way to achieve it.

 

Ok that's great. I hope everyone who has the holy grail keeps winning.

I am not that interested in roulette nor gambling. I just use roulette to improve my precog. When I ask for a demonstration my motive is only to see someone do what has been deemed impossible.

If you are worried about revealing the system just make a video with the felt/board blurred?

What is amazing is that your claims are a 1000 times more incredible than precog. You guys are literally overturning thousands of years of math and logic.

I hope one day, just one of these thousands of holy grails slips out to the public so we can all study and apply it to other areas of life. It would be very useful in helping to save lives from natural disasters and possibly alleviate poverty.

Good luck guys.

 

For a guy claiming to be gifted from the "old continent" with magical skills you sure do spill the beans on how intelligent and foundational your qualified opinion is based. I have always suspected you as much. Thank you very much for quantifying this. You have closed the circle by your own admission. I think you were the only one that tried RR and failed. I can go back and look it up. I know it was a precog enthusiast. He was just about as motivated as you appear to be. That's the way the cookie crumbles and how the world goes round and round.

 

Precog it's nothing to do with anything. Beating roulette it's all about logic and observation, and a tremendous amount of practice. That's why you can't figure it out you don't want to do the practice. You want somebody to show you how to do it. That ain't never going to happen without you doing 80% of the work.

 

I found the person. He starts out on page 61 of the RR thread. It's fascinating watching all his results too. It's kairomancer.

 

@TurboGenius most likely some highlighted this already but sessions like your example don't happen often enough to make it a working system and obviously if no advantage flat betting adding progression does not help as seen in my example below (spin counts not included but it does not matter to show it loses). You only get 31 wins in 546 spins

Chart showing play +1 on a win

 

This is what I found out to unfortunately. On many occasions you win. But also a lot where you lose and its back to 1:37 again

 

[QUOTE = "Gigi666, publicación: 133431, miembro: 7806"] [USER = 112] @TurboGenius [/ USER] lo más probable es que algunos ya hayan destacado esto, pero las sesiones como su ejemplo no ocurren con la frecuencia suficiente para que sea un sistema que funcione y obviamente, si no hay ventaja en las apuestas planas, agregar progresión no ayuda, como se ve en mi ejemplo a continuación (no se incluyen los recuentos de giros, pero no importa mostrar que pierde). Solo obtienes 31 victorias en 546 giros
[ATTACH = full] 16687 [/ ATTACH]
Gráfico que muestra el juego +1 en una victoria
[ADJUNTE = completo] 16688 [/ ADJUNTE] [/ QUOTE]
Could you send me the permanence?

 

This session is really good for you to say you can't win...

 

Yes, R-sim results do make you wonder. It, Nah why bother only get a gif from the DR S A

 

The only way to win those choppy sessions is to play as Turbo explains, that you play 1-2 numbers and on occasion 3. Manage your money well so that such tough sessions don't hurt you, that's why you play so few numbers to have much more endurance.
Now we could expand the tops to more numbers and play with an aggressive progression to look for the first hit, but always after a coincidence to be more sure of passing the spread and winning more safely.
Hope that helps you denzie.
But don't pay much attention to me, I'm just a loser who doesn't know anything.

 

Here is a small demonstration playing in an online casino.
I call this form Top Dozens, it is based on what Turbo talks about, a pattern that happens but in a different way than he does, with an aggressive progression looking for a hit and as it is a reliable pattern, you will see that his behavior is steady.
The progression is 1-5-25 and the results speak for themselves, the closer I get to the limit the greater my profit.
I can not reveal the number of numbers because the system would say almost clearly.



I can do it exactly with the horse race, playing from 1 to 3 numbers, but you already know that, the results would be similar, but with a lower performance.

I can also do it as I commented almost in detail in the previous publication, with a much lower expense and logically lower performance, although it all depends on the permanences.

As you can see, once you understand what is happening and the reliable pattern, you just have to work to find the best way to take advantage of it and win.

Surely there are many more ways to take advantage of what Turbo has explained to win, you just have to work to find what suits you and what you want to win, logically, I prefer a 200 ball session where I can win from 1000 to 3000 chips With a box of 1,000 chips, you don't play 2,500 balls to win 500 flat chips.

 

Be a winner have many way.

Turbo genius way
Luckyfella way
Mr. J way
Denzie way
Nimo way
Naughty but nice way
And the others.

Just choose the way you like (but first you must be understand the way them play. Of course not the exact way. But the concept)

I prefer the flat bet and luckyfella concept. Not playing too long. Max 2 hours or about approx 60 spins is enough.

 

Additional notes :

Many thanks for all who give the positive input and never tired although lot of naysayer or who give negative comment.

In one of point of view right how we can be we win in a games of expected value / not fair payout.

But you must think outside the box and combine for the positive input from most people.

I feel the change from my play.

I am not regret join this forum for almost 2 years and consume my time maybe thousand hours to read and another hundred hours too try.

If you already read and consume much energy and time and feeling stuck / frustrated. You can rest for a while maybe days or week even month, and try again to understand.