Roulette An Idiot's Guide to the Global Effect

I knew he would come to this thread and claim his genius. I said that I would make an example of him when he claimed that I would not be able to explain the Global Effect. It was all designed to let him trap himself. All I needed to do was to show what I mean and give clear and understandable examples. If you have learned anything about our differences he runs away from clear communication of any attempt to clarify his points. He always goes to being insulted and then responds to that perception.

He started in saying something like that the global effect is worthless garbage. I checked for a while to see if he had done any research before saying it.That started this war. Now you want to be a caregiver. You want to rescue civility.

You need to look inside yourself and ask why you need something like that. People waste much of their lives having their buttons pushed by control freaks. You might want to check to see if you are codependent or much worse someone's narcissistic supply. And the classic response to your fabrication of control is to call you a mother for mothering adults that have no problem trashing each other without your assistance. You want a safe space then fight for it. You just managed to label me a bully. That's OK with your mothering tactics isn't it? You are so hooked psychologically by our insults and your expectations of decorum handed down to you by what I expect are your personal control freaks that you can't hear me now and you don't know what being used by control freaks even means.

If you don't like a real thread being hijacked by someone who can't help themselves and you need to throw both of us in your space of how the world works then own it for what it really is. You have a rescue complex with a need to support and feed control freaks. That is a waste of life. You are also a control freak. You will get worse as you get bolder. You will likely pass it all down a generation as it was passed down to you, until you stop mothering others, having fake guilt trips, and threatening anger if your suckers don't follow in kind. Now forget what I told you because I'm a bully.

 

Punkcity, I find one thing very interesting about your perceptions here. The most experienced gamblers here know Cloud's tactics and his gambling systems. I call most of it fabricated sophistry that is mostly derivative of worthless advice handed down by others over the years on gambling forums, repackaged, and sold by someone claiming to be a certified creative writer. But you are somehow captured by his material. That says something about where you are as a gambler. Playing the nice police from that perspective makes you look at least mildly silly. Keep learning and practicing. Make up your own mind. Step into shit once in a while, mother people if you need to. It's all fun and games my friend.

 

So getting back to the Global Effect. I am currently interested in seeing if I can go to a strong use of the combo bet as I recently demonstrated. It allows you to go along with a smaller bankroll. If you want to use these three way and two way combo bets you can do it with a much smaller bankroll. But what interests me the most is a mild progression.

So my research must determine how long of a losing streak will I experience when that sequence of death comes calling. If you just blind bet the same combo three way bet with five numbers in the bet you can get stretches of as much as 20 lost bets in a row. 20 time 5 equals 100. So a bankroll of 100 is enough to take 20 losses in a row. So perhaps a progression that conquers 60 losses in a row might be safe enough.

But blind betting the same combo leaves out Reading Randomness. Since there is no artificial intelligence working the simulation side for Reading Randomness all the research must be done the hard way. It will take a lot of done by hand work that will take hundreds of hours to accumulate.

It's too bad that there are not a lot of skilled players that have mastered Reading Randomness. They have instantaneous skills at trend and pattern recognition. They can see the global effect and the elegant patterns. They can read the real time telemetry of the effectiveness states. They are not bothered by the suffering of fools.

I think there is something to be said about the use of combo bets versus EC bets. I first learned about randomness back in 1993 by seeing actual global effects and elegant patterns work like monster magic. It took decades to turn those things into a simplified method. I was 100% on my own to research an original topic. There was no suggestion of a global effect, elegant patterns, or the effectiveness states in any books that I purchased. John Patrick and Frank Scoblete had nothing on this. R. D. Ellison talked about trends but never went much into depth about the characteristics of trends and patterns. There was nothing out there. Even when the internet got going there was nothing.

This research into trends ended up getting labeled Reading Randomness. I then spent 14 years in and out of flame wars with mathBoyz, mathNazi's, and mathZombies. Then there is the very rare occasions of being cannon fodder for attention whoring wannabe authors. But I have managed to talk civilly with anyone interested in learning what I have been sharing. I welcome any research by others on the topic. It will always be strewn with boisterous critics that need to trash it. Sometime I just want to take a dump. (on their faces)

You earthlings have no idea what it is like to climb the great walls of Yosemite and while doing so have the power of full consecration given to you by the ultimate reality of the experience. Since that is what it is I can't relate the value of full powered concentration to you. I don't mention this as some lame form of ego tripping. I mention it because debating who's right versus the effort it takes to communicate is two different worlds. It's interesting to me to stay in valued communication. By staying focused I get value from life. But being interrupted while trying to find out what others think by people with other needs gives me the right to play with their heads like it's a toy. They don't have the power to concentrate and you can come up on their weak side and poke them. If you want to interrupt common sense communication and insert your head trips then I get to use you as anyway that I see fit.

So getting back to the Global Effect, after an asshole said that I would never be able to do it, is OK with me. People that want to learn will ask questions and I will try to answer them to the point that it is clear that this effort was was successful in communicating with them. This gambling forum is about sharing ideas and doing research to see if those ideas have merit.

 

Always remember who is your audience . Wannabe pros or recreational gamblers .


ND

 

I was not even an experienced recreational gambler when I massacred my first casino with my first elegant pattern. Most of us know that the first stage is progressions followed by giving up on progressions. Then comes magical fallacies. After that the search for a mathematical weakness. Then there are the frustration years. Then comes the third year apprentice knows more than any journeyman phase. After that and years of losing paychecks comes the I have learned my lesson phase. Then there's the healthy skeptic phase backed with real playing experience. And last there is the I will remember to quit while I'm ahead phase. People always consider the simplest approach the last. I say that it is bet big when you are doing good and bet small win your aren't. I bet on trends that predict nothing while they are in a winning phase and appear to be working. I bet the smallest amount each spin when the trends are not working. It's so simple. Yet Reading Randomness is too difficult to pick up by people stuck in phases. I think I have considered others. It's no big deal. Junket King said I could share it and that it would not kill the game. It could be that he's a skeptic and doesn't think that it will work but I at least opened his eyes to visual dexterity in playing charts. People will see this after they have exhausted their own interests in the phases that currently captivate them. If they come looking for it that is.

 

So I did find out one thing. This form of a few numbers is boring.

Code:

 W | B  R | O  E | L  H | F | 0 | P | S |  --  SN  --  SP 
 nb| X    | X    | X    | 1 |   | X | X |  --  01  --  11 
 nb|    X |    X | X    | 2 |   | X | X |  --  02  --  12 
 nb|    X | X    |    X | 9 |   |   |   |  --  03  --  19 
 nb|    X | X    | X    | 7 |   | X | X |  --  04  --  07 
 nb| X    |    X |    X | 0 |   |   | X |  --  05  --  20 
 nb| X    |    X |    X | 4 | X | X |   |  --  06  --  24 
 nb| X    |    X |    X | 2 |   |   | X |  --  07  --  22 
 nb| X    | X    | X    | 5 |   |   | X |  --  08  --  15 
 nb| X    | X    |    X | 5 | X |   | X |  --  09  --  35 
 nb| X    |    X | X    | 6 |   | X |   |  --  10  --  06 
   |    X | X    | X    | 9 | X |   |   |  --  11  --  09 ( $ -100 ) Black/Even/High/
   | X    |    X |    X | 4 | X | X |   |  --  12  --  24 ( $ -180 ) Red/Six's/Odd/
   | X    |    X |    X | 8 | X | X |   |  --  13  --  28 ( $ -240 ) Black/Zero's/Special's/
   |    X |    X | X    | 4 | X |   |   |  --  14  --  14 ( $ -340 ) Black/Even/High/
   | X    | X    | X    | 5 |   |   | X |  --  15  --  15 ( $ -420 ) Red/Even/Low/
   |    X | X    | X    | 7 |   | X | X |  --  16  --  07 ( $ -520 ) Zero's/Not Prime's/Not Special's/
   |    X | X    | X    | 9 | X |   |   |  --  17  --  09 ( $ -600 ) Black/Odd/Low/
   | X    | X    | X    | 1 |   | X | X |  --  18  --  11 ( $ -700 ) Red/Odd/Low/
   |    X | X    |    X | 5 | X |   | X |  --  19  --  25 ( $ -780 ) Black/Odd/Low/
   | X    |    X | X    | 6 |   | X |   |  --  20  --  06 ( $ -880 ) Red/Odd/High/
   | X    |    X | X    | 8 |   |   | X |  --  21  --  08 ( $ -1000 ) Red/Zero's/Not Special's/
   | X    | X    |    X | 1 |   | X | X |  --  22  --  31 ( $ -1100 ) Black/Even/Low/
   |    X | X    | X    | 7 |   | X | X |  --  23  --  07 ( $ -1180 ) Black/Odd/High/
   | X    |    X | X    | 4 |   | X |   |  --  24  --  04 ( $ -1280 ) Red/Odd/Low/
   |    X |    X |    X | 6 | X |   |   |  --  25  --  36 ( $ -1400 ) Six's/Not Prime's/Special's/
   |    X |    X | X    | 8 |   | X |   |  --  26  --  18 ( $ -1460 ) Six's/Not Prime's/Not Special's/
   | X    |    X | X    | 0 | X |   | X |  --  27  --  10 ( $ -1520 ) Six's/Not Prime's/Not Special's/
   |    X | X    |    X | 1 |   |   | X |  --  28  --  21 ( $ -1580 ) Six's/Not Prime's/Not Special's/
   | X    | X    | X    | 1 |   | X | X |  --  29  --  11 ( $ -1640 ) Six's/Not Prime's/Not Special's/
   |    X | X    |    X | 5 | X |   | X |  --  30  --  25 ( $ -1700 ) Six's/Not Prime's/Not Special's/
   |    X | X    |    X | 7 | X | X |   |  --  31  --  27 ( $ -1780 ) Black/Low/Odd/
   | X    | X    |    X | 5 | X |   | X |  --  32  --  35 ( $ -1860 ) Black/Low/Odd/
   |    X | X    | X    | 5 |   | X |   |  --  33  --  05 ( $ -1940 ) Black/Low/Odd/
   | X    |    X |    X | 2 |   |   | X |  --  34  --  22 ( $ -2020 ) Black/Low/Odd/
   | X    |    X | X    | 6 |   | X |   |  --  35  --  06 ( $ -2100 ) Black/Low/Odd/
   |    X |    X |    X | 4 |   |   |   |  --  36  --  34 ( $ -2180 ) Black/Low/Odd/
   |    X | X    |    X | 1 |   |   | X |  --  37  --  21 ( $ -2260 ) Black/Low/Odd/
 X | X    | X    | X    | 1 |   | X | X |  --  38  --  11 ( $ -1620 ) Black/Low/Odd/
   |    X |    X |    X | 2 |   | X | X |  --  39  --  32 ( $ -1700 ) Black/Low/Odd/
   | X    |    X | X    | 0 | X |   | X |  --  40  --  10 ( $ -1780 ) Black/Low/Odd/
   | X    |    X |    X | 0 |   |   | X |  --  41  --  20 ( $ -1860 ) Black/Low/Odd/
   | X    |    X | X    | 8 |   |   | X |  --  42  --  08 ( $ -1940 ) Black/Low/Odd/
   | X    |    X |    X | 4 | X | X |   |  --  43  --  24 ( $ -2020 ) Black/Low/Odd/
   | X    | X    |    X | 3 |   |   | X |  --  44  --  33 ( $ -2100 ) Black/Low/Odd/
   |    X |    X | X    | 8 |   | X |   |  --  45  --  18 ( $ -2180 ) Black/Low/Odd/
   | X    |    X | X    | 8 |   |   | X |  --  46  --  08 ( $ -2260 ) Black/Low/Odd/
   | X    | X    |    X | 9 | X |   |   |  --  47  --  29 ( $ -2340 ) Black/Low/Odd/
   |--------------------| 0 | X | X | X |  --  48  --  37 ( $ -2420 ) Black/Low/Odd/
   |    X | X    |    X | 9 |   |   |   |  --  49  --  19 ( $ -2500 ) Black/Low/Odd/
   |    X | X    |    X | 9 |   |   |   |  --  50  --  19 ( $ -2580 ) Black/Low/Odd/
   | X    |    X | X    | 0 | X |   | X |  --  51  --  10 ( $ -2660 ) Black/Low/Odd/
   |    X | X    |    X | 9 |   |   |   |  --  52  --  19 ( $ -2740 ) Black/Low/Odd/
   | X    |    X | X    | 8 |   |   | X |  --  53  --  08 ( $ -2820 ) Black/Low/Odd/
   | X    |    X | X    | 6 |   | X |   |  --  54  --  06 ( $ -2900 ) Black/Low/Odd/
   | X    |    X |    X | 6 | X |   |   |  --  55  --  26 ( $ -2980 ) Black/Low/Odd/
   | X    | X    |    X | 5 | X |   | X |  --  56  --  35 ( $ -3060 ) Black/Low/Odd/
   | X    |    X |    X | 6 | X |   |   |  --  57  --  26 ( $ -3140 ) Black/Low/Odd/
   | X    |    X |    X | 6 | X |   |   |  --  58  --  26 ( $ -3220 ) Black/Low/Odd/
   |    X | X    |    X | 1 |   |   | X |  --  59  --  21 ( $ -3300 ) Black/Low/Odd/
 X | X    | X    | X    | 7 |   | X |   |  --  60  --  17 ( $ -2660 ) Black/Low/Odd/

 

I created a sim to test the same three combos. This small grouping is so boring. I thought that I would like it. But it plays right into me getting lazy.

I'm getting rid of doing it any more. I'll just stick to hunting EC's and when they are working.

 

Just look at those Finales.

Code:

 W | B  R | O  E | L  H | F | 0 | P | S |  --  SN  --  SP 
   | X    |    X | X    | 0 | X |   | X |  --  40  --  10 ( $ -1780 ) Black/Low/Odd/
   | X    |    X |    X | 0 |   |   | X |  --  41  --  20 ( $ -1860 ) Black/Low/Odd/
   | X    |    X | X    | 8 |   |   | X |  --  42  --  08 ( $ -1940 ) Black/Low/Odd/
   | X    |    X |    X | 4 | X | X |   |  --  43  --  24 ( $ -2020 ) Black/Low/Odd/
   | X    | X    |    X | 3 |   |   | X |  --  44  --  33 ( $ -2100 ) Black/Low/Odd/
   |    X |    X | X    | 8 |   | X |   |  --  45  --  18 ( $ -2180 ) Black/Low/Odd/
   | X    |    X | X    | 8 |   |   | X |  --  46  --  08 ( $ -2260 ) Black/Low/Odd/
   | X    | X    |    X | 9 | X |   |   |  --  47  --  29 ( $ -2340 ) Black/Low/Odd/
   |--------------------| 0 | X | X | X |  --  48  --  37 ( $ -2420 ) Black/Low/Odd/
   |    X | X    |    X | 9 |   |   |   |  --  49  --  19 ( $ -2500 ) Black/Low/Odd/
   |    X | X    |    X | 9 |   |   |   |  --  50  --  19 ( $ -2580 ) Black/Low/Odd/
   | X    |    X | X    | 0 | X |   | X |  --  51  --  10 ( $ -2660 ) Black/Low/Odd/
   |    X | X    |    X | 9 |   |   |   |  --  52  --  19 ( $ -2740 ) Black/Low/Odd/
   | X    |    X | X    | 8 |   |   | X |  --  53  --  08 ( $ -2820 ) Black/Low/Odd/
   | X    |    X | X    | 6 |   | X |   |  --  54  --  06 ( $ -2900 ) Black/Low/Odd/

0's, 8's, & 9's went on a run.

That's 10 numbers. It's not so long shot if you are searching for them. It just takes a skilled player.

Think fast if you want to see everything.

 

One cat is playing X 4 4 meaning X the selected number with 4 contiguous neighbors on each side .


$ 5 on each number .


I do not know how he picks the central number .



Play at your own risk.

 

Finales??? Really?

What's magical about finales?

 

Nothing. It's no different than any other sets and groupings that produce streaks of wins and streaks of losses.

 

Bet you were dry blowing by the end of that post. Epic wanktard syndrome. Tabone really porked you and your dog deep and hard. Thanks for your unfolding car crash , can you keep it up daily for the 3000 to 4000 days you have left on the planet? Let’s see if you stay staunch and true to your bitter end , I will enjoy the journey. Epic
Thanks for showing me the real you. I will print this thread out and wipe my arse with it and when you die I will definitely wipe my arse on that post.
You don’t believe anything you wrote in this quoted post, especially the last paragraph what a wanktard your buttons are always pushed, epic , 25years being the intervese warrior princess epic fool.
Thanks for the train wreck.
25 years haaaaaahaaaa
Epic.

 

PunkT, You are so funny. All blown up and mad. I guess I really nailed you to a tee. So it's codependency and aspiring control freak. It's you that has a long ways to go to ever find normal.

I'm really glad that we had this talk.

 

Haaaaaahaaaa deluxe wanker “ I massacred the casinos “ yeah right, must have been in that interverse far far away. Epic plane crash . Bet you blew a dry wad after posting that delusional “ I massacred the casino “ you must be related to dark oz or your his sock puppet here.
Epic “ I massacred some crystal meth, oops sorry the casino “ haaaaaahaaaa You really posted that ? Haaaaaahaaaa funny I never saw the news item how some returd “Massacred the casino “
25 years haaaaaahaaaa, massacred the casino haaaaaahaaaa, priceless
Tabone ripped you a new one and you been spinning outside your interverse to try and be the top god , “I massacred the casinos “ haaaaaahaaaa
You are more giving than herpies and we all know herpies lasts longer than love.
“I massacred the casino “
Here lies giztrom the warrior princess, the defender of the those that didn’t need his defending but he knew better than everyone else , the MASSACRER of casino and a really really nice guy that used to dry wad blow after posting unsubstantiated dribble on the inter verse for 25 years he peddled . But he sure could massacre a casino better than anyone, well maybe not dark oz.
rip epic
Epic look forward to your next sinking titanic moment. Epic
Haaaaaahaaaa

 

Did I mention haaaaaahaaaa
Haaaaaahaaaa

 

Oh you the best giz. Haaaaaahaaaa

 

No not angry completely entertained by you. Thanks
Haaaaaahaaaa you disaster you.
I massacre casino, barf haaaaaahaaaa

 

Yep, blown sky high mad.

 

What the casino you massacred? Nice job priceless, cheers

 

What happened at the massacre ? The slot machine spit our c67 nickels ?