1. Welcome to the #1 Gambling Community with the best minds across the entire gambling spectrum. REGISTER NOW!
  2. Join our $5,000 Cash Giveaway!

    Win Cash by Posting and Inviting New Members!
  3. Have a gambling question?

    Post it here and our gambling experts will answer it!
    Dismiss Notice
  4. Discussions in this section are assumed to be EV- as they are outside of the Advantage Play section. For EV+ discussions, please visit the Advantage Play sub-forum.
    Dismiss Notice

Roulette An open letter to the misfits

Discussion in 'Roulette Forum' started by TurboGenius, Dec 3, 2019.

  1. TurboGenius

    TurboGenius Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2015
    Likes:
    830
    Occupation:
    Self proclaimed Theoretical Philosopher
    Location:
    Near Atlantic City New Jersey
    Let's see any of the misfits use 1% of energy they pour out against me
    and use it to better the community as a whole. They can't. It's simply impossible.
    We even have a "mad coder" now who can't post without a typo but somehow made
    a working code to test his own interpretation of what I said. If the chart goes down -
    EXCELLENT work !!
    And let's not forget the "I was a fan but now I hate you too !" Eddy who went from one
    extreme to the other in search of attention - or whatever the reason is.

    Trust me - none of that bothers me 1 bit. I'm sure it's meant to - I mean, LOOK at this
    crowd of misfits all hurling the same stones over and over at me.. It's comical.
    It shows - that to them I am either a threat or they simply can't handle the fact that
    they are irrelevant on the forums and surely I don't deserve a second glance either.
    When you think about failures you can only see your own reflections.
    I can't find a damn thing any of you have done (from Sir Anyone on down to the latest
    member of your misfits group) who have helped a single person in any way.

    You guys jumping on people who post positive ideas and results if it involves "me"
    is a sad thing to watch. But it is how it is on a forum. No wonder more people don't post and just
    read - my email is the proof of that and that's their typical explanation, no one wants to contribute
    and put themselves through what the misfits are drooling to dish out against them.

    You could help people.......... try it ! It's not a bad thing at all.
    You'll end up being a productive member of a group in the process.
    You'll even learn some things - which I understand is an impossible scenario in your
    eyes... but trust me, you will.

    If you can't handle that - then in 20 years or 30 years you'll still be the same
    misfits. Look all the way back to GG - same names, same people - still doing the
    same thing - contribution level 0.

    And don't work off of the assumption that if I don't post here anymore then things
    will suddenly be different.
    I haven't posted at Steve's forum in ages now and go look. "Turbo" this, "Turbo" that.
    "Turbo's idea", "Turbo is an idiot". It goes on and on and on.

    Seems I'm such a popular topic to discuss which doesn't play well with the
    misfit's constant comments that I'm full of sh*t.

    Oh then it is turned to "anyone who listens to him is just as ignorant and stupid
    as he is" -
    So tell me... how did that work for Hillary ? She called an entire group of people
    "deplorable" just because she thought she was higher and mightier than anyone else.
    How did that work out ? lol.

    But please carry on - derail ideas, insult people who win - tell everyone that there is
    no way to win but do nothing to help a single member. Worthless
    comments with pictures and gifs for the comedy - again helping no one.
    And never stop going after the person you wish that you were but can never be.
    Every time you open your mouths you prop me higher and boost my support.
    Like the person who actually won the election - your efforts backfire.
    They still haven't learned and neither have you.
    People KNOW who is there to help them, and they know who is throwing stones
    and rocks because of their own agendas and insecurities. The rest of us will keep "winning".

    Oh, and also don't forget to call me names - "narcissist" is a good one,
    while you wait and wait - and the forum stays idle until I make a thread or a post and then
    all your glorious brain cells kick into gear to come after me. It's pretty amazing.
    I'm not important at all - but yet I sure am aren't I. To YOU. You guys have no other
    purpose here. I don't mind you running behind me yelling and crying and throwing rocks -
    sure it's annoying to everyone else but it's all you have.

    Thanks for reading, please don't change.
     
    Nathan Detroit and RickK like this.
  2. theLaw

    theLaw Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2017
    Likes:
    58
    Location:
    Tennessee
    The old "preemptive strike". Right out of the victim's playbook.

    Seems like everyone is starting to turn against you Turbo.

    Is this because we're just trolling you.........or perhaps it's something that you've done, like disregarding any test that doesn't match your personal results. Still waiting on your explanation of why "Weisbaden" (publicly available) spins are suspect, as you claimed in another thread.

    What you're experiencing here Turbo, is what is called a tipping-point, where too many members no longer trust your posts.

    However, if you feel like you want to "better the community as a whole", why not find some publicly available spins that we can all use to test your methods. Or just keep yelling at the moon. Cheers!:cool:
     
  3. TurboGenius

    TurboGenius Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2015
    Likes:
    830
    Occupation:
    Self proclaimed Theoretical Philosopher
    Location:
    Near Atlantic City New Jersey
    Not the case at all, I'm fine if 99% of the members don't care about my posts. I'm not here for that - nor I am here to try to gain attention from other's work. Hmm.

    Oh ask Sir No One. I hear he's great a giving reliable spins (that later are found out to be bias spins and therefore meaningless to use to test from - but "shhhhhh" no one is supposed to know that trick was passed off on people.)
    What I simply said about Weisbaden spins is that A) They can't be seen as reliable accurate spins unless
    someone verifies this (as in being in the casino and then comparing those recorded spins to the ones posted).
    Unless your ok with being fed potentially incorrect spins and testing against them (for some strange reason).
    and B) testing a system against recorded past spins breaks number 1 rule of the misfits bible (for shame, don't you have a copy ?) Past spins are useless. So testing against past spins is equally useless. How did you not get that ?
    And it breaks rule 2 of the misfits bible - It's not enough spins !
    Sure you can test a year's worth of recorded spins and come out ahead - but no,no,no,no that's simply
    NOT enough spins to prove anything !
    For someone with application in hand to the misfits club, you should really learn the rules of how
    they operate or else you can't post in sync with the rest of them.

    Remember to try to argue from the same side of the street or else you end up running in circles.
     
    Last edited: Dec 4, 2019
  4. theLaw

    theLaw Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2017
    Likes:
    58
    Location:
    Tennessee
    So are you saying that there are no publicly available spins that we could all use to test a method?

    So how would your method be tested exactly (by someone other than you)?
     
    Ka2 and jekhb1976 like this.
  5. TurboGenius

    TurboGenius Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2015
    Likes:
    830
    Occupation:
    Self proclaimed Theoretical Philosopher
    Location:
    Near Atlantic City New Jersey
    Oh lookie ! it's "Nathan" again with a "like".

    He's so cool like that.

    Remember the time he started a thread at the other place
    the "HOLY GRAIL" thread ?
    https://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=15520.0

    Oh he was fine with this blatant Bullshit:
    "Betting BLACK against Red at the 4th spin he odds at Red winning are 31=1 whereas Black is 1-1 ."

    No answers to anyone as to how, or why, or WHAT for that matter lol.
    Strange that I'm blamed for doing that when your own "special" club of misfits is
    best known for doing it and not me. Deflection indeed.
    Remember to "not eat your own" - please defend a fellow misfits nonsense post titled
    "Holy Grail" lol

    It's ok, feel free to blame me for your own actions - people who actually read forums know the
    truth and who is "full of it".
     
  6. TurboGenius

    TurboGenius Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2015
    Likes:
    830
    Occupation:
    Self proclaimed Theoretical Philosopher
    Location:
    Near Atlantic City New Jersey
    Just use RNG results from a reliable source.
    You'll see that there is no difference between a non bias wheel and RNG results.

    But it won't matter - when anything tested wins, it's that the RNG is SET to payout
    better than expected in order to FOOL the player into using real money (even if it's a site where
    money is never involved LOL).
    That's rule #3 of the misfits bible - how to counter winning results and blame it on some
    trickery done by whatever the source of the random numbers come from.
     
  7. TurboGenius

    TurboGenius Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2015
    Likes:
    830
    Occupation:
    Self proclaimed Theoretical Philosopher
    Location:
    Near Atlantic City New Jersey
    I'll take "trolling" for the win.
    Thanks !
    My first online game show and I won on the first try.
     

  8. theLaw

    theLaw Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2017
    Likes:
    58
    Location:
    Tennessee
    So you would trust a test run by someone else from a "reliable" RNG using your method?
     
  9. TurboGenius

    TurboGenius Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2015
    Likes:
    830
    Occupation:
    Self proclaimed Theoretical Philosopher
    Location:
    Near Atlantic City New Jersey
    Well, assuming A) They didn't change the results (like running off spins to text file and replacing numbers
    with other numbers, etc) or continuously run off 50,000 sets until a session did poorly, etc etc
    and assuming B) That person knew the exact process to test such a method.

    Then of course !
    Their results would equal mine, as I don't pick and choose results and I know my process.
    I suppose that leaves me to test my own methods and post the results with the intention
    of guiding others to the correct path to do so on their own.
    Oh wait ! Damn, I do that already.
     
    Bitrock06 likes this.
  10. theLaw

    theLaw Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2017
    Likes:
    58
    Location:
    Tennessee
    So what you're saying is that there would be no way for you to know unless their results were similar to yours?
     
    Last edited: Dec 4, 2019
  11. jekhb1976

    jekhb1976 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2019
    Likes:
    194
    Location:
    Holland
    AN OPEN LETTER!
    Oh boy :rolleyes: Is this how far you have gone, jeez.
     
    Last edited: Dec 4, 2019
    Junket King likes this.
  12. Sharptracker

    Sharptracker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2018
    Likes:
    236
    Location:
    Belgium
    Turbo, do you think it will be much better if every morning we'd post an idea on how to beat the roulette?

    Today law of third, wait 30 spins and play the repeaters... ok sheeps search!

    Tomorow Law of third play the street that reach 9 hit to hit a 10th hit! Ok sheeps, test!

    And so on and so on...
     
  13. Ka2

    Ka2 Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2019
    Likes:
    50
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Turbo,

    I'll answer in all honestly. Did I liked your IDEAS? Yes I did, I still do! I said that before! I liked your thinking outside the box! But in the beginning when the testing begin. I just said look these IDEAS dont work... Then you started with calling us MISFITS, and shouting left and right that we were doing it wrong, and then adding stuff as we went along, and we proofed that they did not work either.

    You keep yelling I have beaten the math, with math. And clearly with the things that havent been posted. You havent.

    No if we started all over and you just said look guys I have an IDEA that just might work, i've tested it for a few spins and it seemed to held up, can we start working on it together/ programming it, and see if will held up for forever. Then everything was fine, just of couple of guys on the internet testing ideas, we might even have a laugh or 2.

    But NO, I was a misfit... then yes, if you choose that route, I have few tricks into my sleeve also.

    Now you go even further claiming my calculations are wrong (you can check the file yourself below) or even claim the spins from actual casinos are wrong. Everything is wrong and wrong again, no matter the evidence, only you are the one that is right...

    https://1drv.ms/x/s!Aqv3aY9D7HpjgsBh-cYFnJXEjZS24Q?e=5OTJpU
     
    Last edited: Dec 4, 2019
  14. Sharptracker

    Sharptracker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2018
    Likes:
    236
    Location:
    Belgium

  15. Ka2

    Ka2 Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2019
    Likes:
    50
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Hmmmmmmmmmmmm
    Dunning-Kruger Effect

    The Dunning-Kruger effect is a type of cognitive bias in which people believe that they are smarter and more capable than they really are. Essentially, low ability people do not possess the skills needed to recognize their own incompetence. The combination of poor self-awareness and low cognitive ability leads them to overestimate their own capabilities.

    Yes, yes, this sounds about right.....
     
    Bago likes this.
  16. Sharptracker

    Sharptracker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2018
    Likes:
    236
    Location:
    Belgium
    Confirmation Bias: This is favoring information that conforms to your existing beliefs and discounting evidence that does not conform.

    It is not list in this page but coherence bias is very stong also... Once you're use to do/believe something it becomes very hard to go against...
    An example among many: A player play martingale put so much money that now he cannot refuse to give up and will go till he got nothing to stay coherent with the fact he put a lot of money allready.

    A player that spent so much time in something won't give up to stay coherent because it will mean he made all this for nothing...
     
  17. Bago

    Bago Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2017
    Likes:
    191
    Location:
    Mars
     
  18. TurboGenius

    TurboGenius Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2015
    Likes:
    830
    Occupation:
    Self proclaimed Theoretical Philosopher
    Location:
    Near Atlantic City New Jersey
    Ka2 likes this.
  19. Ka2

    Ka2 Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2019
    Likes:
    50
    Location:
    Netherlands
    See now you even made me laugh! I give up, no point going around in circles for eternity...

    Turbo for your sake, I hope you keep winning a long time before the fat lady sings...

    For the rest...

    Well...

    You have been warned!

    Over and out...
    (This was the final post of Ka2 on this forum)
     
  20. Sharptracker

    Sharptracker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2018
    Likes:
    236
    Location:
    Belgium
    Well this is not freudian... Freud would wonder if daddy was a gambler for example and would interest to a personnal case.

    Cognitive bias concerning everyone of us and can be exploited for many things ( advertising, gurus, scammers etc etc)... It's very good to know them to recognize them in certains situations...
     

Share This Page