Baccarat Analyzing Brett Morton

So when do i bet here?
After 3 ,4 ?

 

Gains of +2: 26
Losses of -3: 11
Losses of -4: 0

Total Gains:
Each gain is +2.
Number of gains: 26.
Total gain: 26×2=52

Total Losses:
Each loss of -3
Number of losses of -3: 11
Number of losses of -4: 0
Total loss: 11×(−3)+0×(−4)=−33

Total net gain: 19 units
----------------------------------------------

Gains of +2: 17
Losses of -3: 4
Losses of -4: 0

Total Gains:
Each gain is +2
Number of gains: 17
Total gain: 17×2=34

Total Losses:
Each loss of -3
Number of losses of -3: 11
Number of losses of -4: 0
Total loss: 4×(−3)+0×(−4)=−12

Total net gain: 22 units
---------------------------------------------

Gains of +2: 12
Losses of -3: 2
Losses of -4: 0

Total Gains:
Each gain is +2
Number of gains: 12
Total gain: 12×2=24

Total Losses:
Each loss of -3
Number of losses of -3:2
Number of losses of -4: 0
Total loss: 2×(−3)+0×(−4)=−6

Total net gain: 18 units

 

I’m curious as to what your bet selection is here to get these kinds of numbers @atrox23

 

I did sett the rules as Sputnik said above, there are three different variations, same 500 results !

 

Ignore the unit size!

 

You’re doing alright! Keep it going!

 

Good thrrad. My thoughts are: Is there really one fixed pet selection that performs better than another? Probably not. Likely ,Morton doesn't use a fixed bet selection and therefore does not define it. A savvy player may do well by simply betting the strength of the shoe. Even flat bet. @Mars. Flat bet is flne as long as you are happy with the size of your unit.

I think the strength is in defining the 4 stages and managing your losses by keeping them low. You could also use a negative progression by adjusting it to match the four stage criteria using units won and lost as your guide to adjust.

J

 

Just one example with series 3:


36
22
8
33
25--Bet 1: Outcome 25 (R), Net Gain: -1
15--Bet 2: Outcome 15 (B), Net Gain: 0
8--Bet 3: Outcome 8 (B), Net Gain: 1
31--Bet 4: Outcome 31 (B), Net Gain: 2
Net gain of +2 achieved. Stopping bets

Gains of +2: 1
Losses of -3: 0
Losses of -4: 0

 

Thanks Jimske. At least with flat or a modified version of that then there is no working over some way to decide on the next.

As I just posted under progressions, I really want to simplify things as the in-person table conditions typically can best be described as _hit. I am so sick of sitting their minding my own business at a good shoe and of course 'Mr and Mrs $#%!^$# of the world first night ever playing baccarat and we are buzzed and talkative' sits down and starts doing all the dumbest things ever. If it is not that, then it is a half dozen other stupid conditions that tend to play out. Take that same exact shoe with a couple other strong players instead, and everyone is racking up monster win.

Managing that type of garbage is so much of the game, as hard as it may be, set safeguards are the way to go.

 

I have studied your various writings through ChatGPT. However, they are really difficult for me, too difficult. I study your methods almost entirely through ChatGPT, but they often provide me with incorrect methods. The only method I have figured out is to aim for a series of 3 after 7 singles and, if it fails, aim for +1 when the series of 3 appears up to 3 times. But I couldn't win with just this method. I have lost a lot of money on sports betting, which you like, and I work during the day on construction sites and continue working. While enjoying it is nice, I need to earn an amount similar to what I make on the construction site each day through baccarat. That is my dream. I believe my family can be happy that way. I want to win or lose in a way that I can understand and accept. I sincerely and earnestly ask for your help. How can I achieve small wins at least? I sincerely ask for your guidance. Please teach me.

 

I am doing very well with trading and growing with the game theory task and will comment on my judgment and opinion.

Do never attempt anything else or make up something similar to Brett Mortons Fund Management Strategi and implement it on all your ways attacking or approaching the game, strict or relax but never sloopy rules for controlling the overall performance in execturing.

Have a great day.

 

Strangely, people search and go around in a circle - backtrack what works and you are done.
I know Brett Morton speaks the truth.

Here is he's approach with positive progression.

+60 Units
-32 units

Around 60 sessions ...

Have a nice day and don't message me as I don't have the time to teach

+0
+2,5
+1,5
+4,5
-2
+0
+0
+0
-2
+0
+0
+0,5
+0
+0
+0
+0
+4,5
+0
-2
+0
+1,5
-2
+1,5
+0
-2
+0
+0
+0
+0
+0
+0
-2
+1,5
+0
+0
+0
-2
+0
+0,5
+22,5
+1,5
+0,5
+0
+0
+0
-2
-2
+0
+0
-2
+0
+0,5
+0
+0
-2
-2
+0
+0,5
-2
+0
+0
+0
+0
+1,5
+0
+0
+0,5
-2
+0,5
-2
-2
+13,5

 

Just over 2 units a shoe average and you are warning netizens not to contact you?

 

You are a funny person and I question your knowledge!
When 99,99% of all members of this forum don't know how to make +1 unit in the long term, no matter what casino game we talk about.
So put that in perspective and you can think or argue with others, but I don't care as I know I speak the truth.

Who should members listen to, someone who is winning on a regular basis and has an edge or one punter who searches for the impossible edge with casino games?

My intention is and was with the reply that by sticking to BM rules with bank management you can have control and lose less and stay ahead after one year of regular visits - maybe 0,5% has succeeded doing just that flat betting on this forum and even that is too much ...

Have a nice day and take care.

 

You are conflating terrible results as some type of awesome thing with the majority of baccarat players being far too aggressive. I have already mentioned this several times here on the bro forums and everyone who has spent more than a few minutes at the tables is aware of this 35.5 trillion %. Stand by your messaging for all the inquiries on 2 units lol.

The Brett Morton outlines an idea that almost 100% of players arrive at on their own. Yes, executing it is difficult because netizens want to win Fort Knox so that makes you a bacc god?

 

It's ridiculous and nonsense - you can disagree it doesn't matter.
No winning punters and no edge and my results are good in any gambling book.

Keep on posting and waste forum space

I just thought it would be better if people stopped going around in circles, is sad.
People who spend a decade on gambling forums and still don't know how to win.

Have a nice evening and take good care.

Cheers

 

Worthless stats - make +60 or above with 1000 placed bets flat betting twice with the same method with all the public results in how you did it with instructions and pdf document with all the placed bets - then you can speak to me - if not - then I have to ignore you and don't give you my attention as you are not worth it ...

Cheers

 

Nobody cares. Just go for +1 unit per shoe then go to the next shoe. In the meantime nobody will contact you. You math bros. really are a piece of work. Baccarat is still dealing worldwide in person and online 247 since the 1st hand so you should have solved it already by now with your calculus hey hey!

 

Yes you are right ….
No body cares ….

Make me think of the book
Rich dad & Poor dad

Is sad that there is so many losers that have dreams about winning
Pure sad