Roulette Any professional roulette players here?

five,how often you occur the big loss to get tenth win and do you play immediately big again in that 100 for 10th win

 

i have got some more interesting questions, if half side is wins most, do you still bet high on tenth win and how many units can it be maximum in your suggestion

 

Evening Mansi like I said. Its rare to not get the 10th win by the 18th game. And 9 times out of 10 you get the 10th win in 16 games or less. Games 11 to 16 are where most of the 10th game hits come.

 

Now this is good question.

If I have an amazing first half like I had a few days ago. 9/1 split. Meaning 9 of the first 10 games won. I will often not even play the second half but just record it for my records.

This restraint is precious. And its something that often saves you from giving back profit. As it turned out that set was as good as its ever got. With a final split of 19/1. But the second half could have been 5/5 or worse. So why surrender profit for no reason.

This is on the fly thinking. See we may be using a mechanical system. But that doesnt mean you have to behave like a robot. You make judgements which often save you taking backward steps.

Ive never ever had 20/0. But ive had 19/1 four times now.

 

evening
yes usually it has happened between these timelines, but what about betting high on tenth win again after loss immediately?,
my stats shows its good idea to risk again, but what is your opinion

 

Okay the rules for FIVE.

We play 100 games of five but overall we are only concerened about

Not with you Mansi

Show me an example like I display results.

●
●
●
○
○--
●
●
○
●
●--

●
●
?----So you are saying if this first attempt to get the 10th win fails.

You rack up the stakes on the very next game???

 

Not with you Mansi

Show me an example like I display results.

●
●
●
○
○--
●
●
○
●
●--

●
●
?----So you are saying if this first attempt to get the 10th win fails.

You rack up the stakes on the very next game???[/QUOTE]

exactly. and if i loose on your question mark, then next one again with high stakes.
Thats what i meant, but im not sure how high should i do max, it usually is somewhere around 10 or 5.

 

Just a question... Why not playing 5 different games using sliding spins in order to play all spins?

 

Sharp elaborate on this please with some diagrams if you can??

 

exactly. and if i loose on your question mark, then next one again with high stakes.
Thats what i meant, but im not sure how high should i do max, it usually is somewhere around 10 or 5.[/QUOTE]

Yeah as you may have noticed Mansi. The vast majority of 10th wins come in games 11--15. So I wouldnt go all in lol. But yeah a fair increase wont hurt.

 

For example i show you the first 10 spins:

B/R/B/B/R/R/R/B/R/B
-/R/B/B/R/R/R/B/R/B/B
-/-/B/B/R/R/R/B/R/B/B/B
-/-/-/B/R/R/R/B/R/B/B/B/R
-/-/-/-/R/R/R/B/R/B/B/B/R/R

Instead to play 100 spins, you play 105 spins but you play 5 differents games and play all spins...

 

Is R for Random?

 

Yeah as you may have noticed Mansi. The vast majority of 10th wins come in games 11--15. So I wouldnt go all in lol. But yeah a fair increase wont hurt.[/QUOTE]

Sharp we arent playing 100 spins. We are playing 100 games. And a game can take anything from 6 spins to 36 spins to complete. With the average being around 12 spins. Or 10 games an hour live dealer.

 

@Honesty

R is for Red

@Fivealive

Yes i understood that you were playing 1 spins on Five spins or 20 spins on 100 spins but look in my example it is in bold and if you use sliding spins you could play all the spins if you consider playing 5 differents and independant games.
Imagine that you represent 5 players, you sit when the roulette game started after 5 spins you play your first spin. Another player sat one spin after you, so he will miss a decision and play the 6th spin that the first player wouldn't play etc etc... This way all spins can be bet.

 

exactly. and if i loose on your question mark, then next one again with high stakes.
Thats what i meant, but im not sure how high should i do max, it usually is somewhere around 10 or 5.[/QUOTE]

Mansi

Im finding on an RNG results are biased towards step 2 and losses so far. If this maintains it could be exploited. First 50 games had a one side split of 36/14 to step 2 and lost games.

Second half is the same in games 51 to 71 16 have been step 2 or losses. Thats 52/19 to step 2/lost games.or 33 units profit just flat betting a unit againts step 1 every game.

This has never happened to that extreme on live dealer. If the trend continues it could be exploited. Or is the RNG reading my bet and just opposing me? I will know in the next set as I bet for step 2/losses. If all of a sudden I get a complete reversal. This will tell me all I need to know.

 

Mansi

Im finding on an RNG results are biased towards step 2 and losses so far. If this maintains it could be exploited. First 50 games had a one side split of 36/14 to step 2 and lost games.

Second half is the same in games 51 to 71 16 have been step 2 or losses. Thats 52/19 to step 2/lost games.or 33 units profit just flat betting a unit againts step 1 every game.

This has never happened to that extreme on live dealer. If the trend continues it could be exploited. Or is the RNG reading my bet and just opposing me? I will know in the next set as I bet for step 2/losses. If all of a sudden I get a complete reversal. This will tell me all I need to know.[/QUOTE]

im not quite following you in here, what you found edge about exactly, but far as i seen it usually balances out 60 wins or so per 100 set. 1 loss equals 3 units, so it has to win usually 3 times or so.
but i have found from previous systems that betting 1-3 on ab is more profitable as it takes slightly less then 3 wins to get even that 4 unit loss instead of 3.

 

five, do you have stats about what has been longest drawback in second half when betting high, im getting little tired of playing only candy cookie money with ten cents, that im looking to raise my unit, but bankroll needs to be comfortable of surviving many losses. I know you mentioned you get like 9 wins out of ten, but i have seen two losses in a row also, so some security needs to set to be prepared in worse case scenarium before moving up from ladder.

 

Mansi ,



Some of our casinos here in the ISA require a $ 10 table minimum. Some require a $ 15 Min .


For a $ 10 Min the bankroll requirement would be $ 400.-- per session. Consider winning 2 out of 3 sessions. Total required BR $ 1, 200.--







ND

 

i know, there are so many these kind of casinos out there, really only people who can afford it are able to play these games, otherwise only paper betting to see is this even worth it to put own money in it.
Thats quite robbing actually that table limit is so high

 

The worst thing many people can do is being under capitalized at those tables .


If the table minimum is $ 1 then multiply this by 40. Win goal 15 % and loss limit 25 %. Total BR for 3 sessions $ 120--




ND