Roulette Ask Me Anything About Betting the EC's (Even Chances)

cool, I missed that. It would stick out like a sore thumb in my hand written charts. I hate matrix style charts. Deduction is clearly valuated by concentrated thinking and not by visual dexterity.

 

How about "mathSterbaters?"

 

Who cares? We are people hanging out at a gambling forum.

 

Then missing one bottle to a six pack is the acceptable IQ ?

 

But some one considering all 6 EC is playing with a Full Deck . Correct ?

 

I don't care how smart people are. I care about what they know without any regard to an IQ.

We have a guy at his kitchen table talking about how wonderful the Martingale progression is. That tells everything.

 

A genius testing at the kitchen table and playing unfunded on line .

 

I don't know how he would bet that pattern, but for the fun of it I will show you how my strategy would bet those outcomes. I show a win of 50 units betting every outcome except the 1st. Just think if the base unit was 100.00, that would be a win of 5,000.00 The highest Martingale step I used was the 2nd, a 200.00 bet. I simply bet the last outcome and if the pattern starts to alternate (chop), I bet opposite of last outcome. This pattern was simple, it did not include any Double-Double patterns bb rr bb rr. This pattern makes it more difficult, but just has to be watched for. When I see bb r, I bet r. Even though I can see every outcome, that did not influence my bet placement. I stuck by my rules. You can see that at the places I sustained a loss.

r No bet. Bet this outcome r

r Bet r win 1

r Bet r win 2

r Bet r win 3

b Bet r, lose, 1st step. Double bet. Bet last outcome b

b Bet b win 4

r Bet b, lose 1st step. Pattern is now alternating, double and bet b then r etc.

b Bet b win 5

r Bet r win 6

b Bet b win 7

b Bet r, lose 1st step, Double bet and bet last outcome b

r Bet b lose 2nd step. Double bet. Pattern is alternating bet b then r etc

b Bet b win 8

r Bet r win 9

b Bet b win 10

r Bet r win 11

b Bet b win 12

b Bet r, lose 1st step. Double bet and bet last out come b

b Bet b win 13

b Bet b win 14

b Bet b win 15

b Bet b win 16

b Bet b win 17

b Bet b win 18

b Bet b win 19

r Bet b lose 1 step. Double bet

b Bet r lose 2nd step. Double bet Pattern is alternating

r Bet r win 20

b Bet b win 21

r Bet r win 22

b Bet b win 23

r Bet r win 24

b Bet b win 25

b Bet r lose 1st step. Double bet

b Bet b win 26

b Bet b win 27

b Bet b win 28

b Bet b win 29

r Bet b lose 1st step, Double bet

b Bet r, last outcome lose 2nd step , Double bet. Pattern is alternating

r Bet r win 30

b Bet b win 31

r Bet r win 32

b Bet b win 33

r Bet r win 34

b Bet b win 35

r Bet r win 36

b Bet b win 37

r Bet r win 38

b Bet b win 39

b Bet r, lose 1st step. Double and bet last outcome b

b Bet b win 40

b Bet b win 41

r Bet b lose 1st step. Double and bet r

b Bet r, lose 2nd step. Pattern is alternating. Bet r

r Bet r win 42

b Bet b win 43

b Bet r lose, Double and bet last outcome b

b Bet b win 44

b Bet b win 45

b Bet b win 46

b Bet b win 47

b Bet b win 48

b Bet b win 49

r Bet b lose 1st step. Double bet last outcome r

b Bet r lose 2nd step. Double bet. Pattern is alternating, bet r

r Bet r win 50 units total

 

David,

It's too bad that it only works in the pretend world of gambling and not in the real world.

 

And he'll never find that out because he's too much of a chickenshit to go to a real Casino with his wonderful Martingale.

 

The streak of single reds on the weak side alone allow for 18 wins on black if you were to make all of them and then wait for each next single red until it ends. Say you miss the first 4 singles and you lose the 19th red that then ends the streak as a double. That means you aggregate 13 wins of gain. If you bet the max at $2,000 per bet you reap $26,000. That's just riding the wave of singles on the weak side with the simplest and the most brainless of tactics. Now if you lose the first bet you lose $2,000. If you lose any other bet along the way, after the first successful bet, then you break even or you gain whatever the streak will pay out.

 

You cannot possibly know that. It has not been played yet in the real world. Thanks for your positive comments as usual. You are the most negative guy on this forum. No wonder though, you do not believe any strategy can work since you stopped playing the wobbly roulette wheels. Sorry, they do not exist anymore. I guess the only thing you have left to do now is critisize, criticize, criticize.

 

In Victor Bethell1s Monte Carlo Systems the coup of 2 or 3 did not do well either .

 

The new Huxley wheels are now favoring again the wheel watchers. of today.


Good news for that group.

 

Let me ask you this: Do patterns like the one I demonstrated show up in the real world? Does any kind of patterns show up in the real world? If there are patterns produced in the real world, I can bet them just as easily. A pattern, is a pattern, is a pattern.

 

I would love to see you win 50 units in a row, kitchen table, rng, live play, whatever. I constantly demonstrate, you do nothing but shoot your mouth off. My strategy runs circles around yours and you know it. You are just jealous because I make the Marty work and you never could. If I would of flat bet that pattern I would still have won at least 40 units. Take a hike, Spike, you offer nothing.

 

Smart move, you have to admit.

 

At your kitchen table you can beat casino games, win Nobel prizes, even be the handsomest man in the world. And have a million dollars in the bank and Lincoln in a Mercedes in the driveway. You can do and be anything you want to be as long as you never leave your house. Duh. You dumbass.

 

Right on dude; except for the dumbass part, that's you for sure. I would never accuse you of being a dumbass unless you have proven otherwise. Which you have, over and over and over again. Every remark you make is a dumbass remark because it offers nothing smart. The opposite of smart is dumb. Really dumb is a dumbass. Can't fix that.

 

The next stupid system that might be dug up might be the W rangel system .

Also a Monte Carlo System source .


One bet selection at a time. Not like a monkey under a banana tree.