Roulette Ask Me Anything About Betting the EC's (Even Chances)

Do pink horses have wings ?

 

The Martingale eventually breaks everybody and it will eventually break this fool. I have never understood the appeal of the Martingale and I still don't. Why would anybody in their right mind do this. Risk so many units to make one unit profit. Nowhere else in life are you this stupid with your money.

 

That hot number gimmick is also a bankroll killer , How stupid can one be to accept this fallacy o f

a number to to stay hot .


Who revived this piece of manure ? $ 50 per guess .

 

A brain fart for discussion . That`s all.

 

I have never looked at hot numbers and know absolutely nothing about them. Honest to God my hand on the Bible I've never made an inside bet in my life. For me the inside does not exist because it's all represented by the outside bets. People are bewitched in beguiled by the 35 to 1 payout and I am not.

 

You stay with the EC. I prefer the action system with which I am satisfied since 1989.

 

Due to an air junket delay U played this method for 5 hours or 150 spins .


No HE drawdowns considering the time of play .


Result no loss but broke even .

 

P.S. Due to the late hour we received a free room at the casino hotel and a $ 38 comped

breakfast based on the play .

 

I agree I’ve seen people losing way to much here stupid

 

@SPIKE how long does it take you to recover if you lose 2 in a row?

 

3 to 5 bets usually.

 

Turbo has postulated that at certain times roulette outcomes might be predictable. I have always balked at the word predictable and prefer to say the outcomes are susceptible to educated guessing. Either way, think about what Turbo is saying. Here's a guy with extensive experience of observing roulette outcomes and he has come to the same conclusion, basically, that I came to. That roulette outcomes can sometimes be educationally guessed, or in Turbos world predicted. Which leads us to wonder just how random the 37 or 38 outcomes on a roulette wheel are. Most of the time they are true random, but, sometimes they are less than true random and those are the times you look for. Sometimes unconnected random events can appear to be connected. They are not really but they just appear that way. The key is recognizing when this is happening and capitalizing on it. Easier said than done.

 

EC winnings are based on Luck not strategy . That is a fact .

 

EGS do not want to accept the truth.

 

Spile you missed that out of the box fiasco ater which TG stayed more away.

Now with the hot and cold numbers fallacy they and TG attempting to make feeble return .

It is a fallacy not a winner like the roulette EC.

 

Spike , sorry a typo.

 

That's when Spile gets vile.... LOL

 

In your world, that's true. In my world its totally based on skill. And that's a fact.

 

Yep, it's a skill.

 

It is a skill. I dont want to hijack this thread but....one of my most favorite threads I've ever done,

A person playing roulette for 2 years vs. the other guy playing for 20+ years. You cant tell me they are BOTH equal in the long term.

Yes, the 2 year guy might have a better DAY, but long term? No way. How can this be? (lol)

Ken