Roulette Ask The Croupier

Do not ignore math.

 

La partage information is correct, not applicable if not offered in the country one finds one self in. Theory is theory and can be cut and pasted over the interverse by any fool. Comprehension and application is a different matter.

You deal for a living, other people play for a living, they actually are able to profit from the very thing you deem unplayable, thank you for your service, keep dealing, we need people like you with their cut and paste intelligence to continue dealing the games we are able to profit from.
Win win situation, you get to be a pompous ass with a wage, we get to travel where we want, when we want and win at whichever venue you are not. That being because you are not here , never will be.

So have you decided to answer my question?

How many if any people leave you roulette table during your wage earning shift a winner, as in more chips than they started?

 

now kindly stfu. nobody is interested in the agony you harbour because you can't handle confrontation. You know nothing further on the topic of roulette.

Do you think I actually respect you in the slightest to warrant answering your brain-dead question?

 

There's nothing to refute.

That's like placing yourself on a hill of 'A is the first letter of English alphabet',
the proudly saying' refute it'. That's just moronic.

Another example: Elon invented Tesla .. well, did you invent to be so proud of --
what are proud of!?

======

The point is that you don't have a negative edge working against you in-play = playing at 'true odds'
(which makes your 2u:1u plausible) but you have to forfeit 10% of profits once you withdraw.
Well, you have to think in two steps, don't you, braniac.

Even 2-year old checker players have more grey cells than you.

 

When ka.

 

Its undisputed even chances with La Partage is the optimal bet in roulette. As far as I'm concerned, everyone's bet selection is B-tier, C-tier, D-tier, etc. If your strat is not capitalising on dividing the negative expected value.

Forfeiting 10%! you're the child here.

 

I bet you felt proud after you submitted that.
Fucking Moron!

 

LOL! Even they know that La Partage is a who cares yawner.. It would be great if there were six zeros on the wheel, but there's only one.

 

2 members of your boy band have conceded to mathematical fact about expected value.
Youre the leader SPIKE and you openly admitted to never encountering La Partage in american casino. Please explain to the audience why La Partage is a sleeper?

Do you have any experience in playing la Partage rules? That's right members, left, right, and center, looking through your obvious deception. You've not asked a single question about roulette big man. You indicate no intention of playing FR online because you "claim" to be winning every day, yet you're actively making false accusations in my thread, obviously since you have plenty of time.

 

I can tell you why it's a sleeper in the eyes of an AP.

The accuracy of the prediction and the edge obtained simply renders betting on the La Partage as irrelevant. Besides, APs almost never bet on the ECs.

 

The highest "accuracy of prediction" is the bet on even chances. (48.65%).
Your logic is counterintuitive. The variance of less probable bets is larger than the variance of even chance bets. 18/37 is the highest probability of any bet selection across all roulette variants.

Consider that there are 3 mutually exclusive events in roulette.
Probability(A ∪ B ∪ C)
P( red ∪ black ∪ green)
P(1-18 ∪ 19-36 ∪ green)
P(even ∪ odd ∪ green)
P(18/37 ∪ 18/37 ∪ 1/37)

The mathematical parameters of all possible events in roulette suggest that one should speculate on the outcome with the highest probability of success.

Evidently, the psychology of a self proclaimed AP would dismiss a table advantage as irrelevant.

Because of the payouts, all other bets favour the house by 2.7%. All strategies, at a minimum, are exposed to the negative expectancy of the house edge.

AP is 2.7/2.
Evidently, the psychology of a self proclaimed AP would dismiss even chances altogether. Table advantages such as La Partage are irrelevant to your existing strategies.
What are your reasons as to why you believe La Partage is "irrelevant," a synonym for meaningless? That applies to your vast subjective experience.

 

Yes, my experience with roulette is indeed vast.

 

Now that's funny, somebody questioning your experience with roulette. Nobody here has even close to your experience.

 

That's because they don't understand the game, they just think they do. The even chances payoff exactly the same as the inside numbers in the long run. I play the even chances because they're more exploitable.

 

Is that the state of your rebuttal?

The proposition you claim is that subjectivism, can disregard mathematical axioms because the existence of La Partage, is not connected to your vast roulette experience.

Hence, I ask, why do you believe La Partage is irrelevant considering your little to no experience of playing with the rules? Give me an answer other than the older boys told me so.

 

Patheticity

Gizmoron

Theredeuropean

Dr. Doulbe Standard

Mimic Detroit


Who would love to join SPIKE' boy band!? currently recruiting new impressionable members to domineer these forums. member requirements: present no mathematical data that can be associated to probability in roulette.

 

Ad Hominem and childish.

 

You're too predictable, Dr. Sir Double Standard. Weren't you the one posting in my thread that I'm a fraud and fake?

 

Sorry, but I doubt that you're a dealer. Perhaps I'm wrong and you're a dealer in one of the small casinos in the UK.