Roulette Betting Against Patterns

Blue,

You really haven't got a clue.


Can anyone provide a pattern that is less likely to hit than another specific pattern? (Of course, the patterns must be of the same length, etc..)

 

They don't have to be the same length, they only need to not repeat in order to make a profit for the player.
It's actually simple to do.
I'm going to finish this week in the top 10 again and then next week I'll use nothing but a pattern method based on farthest back and patterns and lets see how I do. When I win, you can call it "fixed" or "irrelevant" and if I lose you can say "I told you so". I won't lose though - isn't that amazing that I can already know that ?
Fossell is right -
"They want you to lose just as much as real play or BM. They want you to pay for more credits. Its exactly the same."
"IF" there was any foul play at work (which there isn't and it would make no sense for there to be) - they would want players to deplete their bankroll (most do, just like in the casino) and then buy in for more credits.
Sir and others will never give credit though when someone uses nothing but small bets - starts with nothing - places in the top 10 every week - builds a $600,000.00+ bankroll in that time and is still going strong. I think if they did, they would have to admit to themselves that "maybe it is possible to win at this game" - and I doubt they can do that.
It's so much easier to say it's all nonsense because then you can validate your own beliefs and never have to admit to being wrong.

 

Turbo,

Come back to the real world. Go to a real casino. That website isn't the real world of gambling.

On that website try playing your system backwards. Meaning bet on the numbers that show the least and you'll find that your win rate is about the same.

 

Been trying to stay neutral, I'm pushing 50 and am getting tired (lol).

Interesting point, only playing the COLDEST numbers. Do I think the results will be close? No I dont but its just my view point.

Ken

 

"Sir Anyone" -
Then everyone would be winning.
Unless you believe they purposely chose ME to win and not the other people playing.
Odd that they would do that. And again, my results are exactly in line with my live play AC and Parx in PA.
The only difference is my unit size. But I get it, you're not interested in how to make 1/2 million in 2 weeks.
It's nonsense - not the real world. fixed, delusional, all those things. (I forgot - "haven't played enough spins"). Important one there - the math doesn't change though. Cheers.

Hey Ken - from as far back as I can remember I used to run tests... hot numbers vs cold numbers.
My brain would always tell me that the cold numbers were due and would catch up, etc etc. even though
the results always showed that playing the hot numbers was the way to go.
There is are a few benefits I think in playing the coldest - but only once they appear, not before. It's the same fallacy but then again it almost always works.

 

Turbo,

Why is it that you couldn't win on Steve's roulette game, but you magically can on the website?

That site is fooling you with a simple rng seed.

 

I'll respond to that in PM if you want, not on the forum. You should already know why.

 

At the minimum, almost all players results would be at least bunched together. Regardless if they were ALL winning or ALL losing. I dont find it a coincidence that of all people on the roulette forums.....Turbo is well ahead. It would be real strange if RouletteGhost was far ahead (sorry, had to). Turbo is at/near the top (in my book) and is ALSO number one with this contest thing? Its not a coincidence and also the reason I hope he does not post all of the rules for his method.

The ONE THING that can sway me a bit (I said it before)....playable in real situations (at a casino).

IN MY OPINION......calculations and placing bets must be done in seconds.

Of course there are side rules for that (lol)......if said method does require a few extra seconds, only play in evening hours during BUSY times!

Ken

 

If you have not noticed, the subject has to do with betting patterns and not comparison of RNG's VS physical wheels.
How you do in your sessions is also irrelevant, your comprehension level is limited therefore I'm not so surprised about your misplaced comments.

 

I said it before. Roulette is all about *LEARNING*!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

This is one thing that RF members just dont get. Turbo, dont apologize for playing/testing cold numbers (as I also did).

It was your/my PAST and we have learned from it !!!!!!!!!

The real morons are the guys that are stuck in neutral with their ideas, they NEVER evolve. They NEVER "kick to the side" (my phrase) older ideas. Players must EVOLVE or die a slow BR death. I have zero sympathy for them.

Ken

 

I've more clues than what you can imagine.

It's for the same reason he doesn't take the 100,000 challenge, it's for the same reason why he doesn't want to take my challenge...but for online circus he's the best! chuckles

 

Blue,

Using a system you need to, "play a statistically irrelevant number of spins."

Do you know what that phrase really means? It's actually a very important statement that system players should read over and over.

 

The disturbing thing about you is that you don't pay attention, you continuously give me the impression that you are replying without reading throughout my posts.
Once again, this is true for the vast majority.

 

Well scoooooz me for going off topic. Duh yeah I must of missed the title!? Blue relax. RNG vs Physical gets mentioned in most threads, just stating my point. My comprehension IS limited; too what I know works. Which is why I don't have time to read and comment in as much detail as I'd like. Don't get me wrong. Ive as much interest in patterns as the next man here. Some things just work better than others. Simple patterns are just what the brain perceives to be a pattern. Those pockets/spaces don't know they are numbers. Change those numbers to colours, letters or mix the numbers up. Do you still have a pattern?

 

Agreed on those qualifiers. Consider that cycle 'the slack in TGs rubber band analogy'. The next cycle is likely to stretch it out.
Those qualifiers are only 3 furlongs in so your stake wouldn't favour any yet, but would be low enough to ride on until someone makes a break for the finish line.
(Shame about Irish War Cry. I had a look but was too late for a punt this side of the pond!)

 

F**k that horse, I hope they put it down.

Ken

 

You suck, Ken.

 

....yeah but you swallow.

Ken

 

lmao