Baccarat Build Math & Probability Based Playing Modells For EC

I have a selection set up to slow track repeated sections like 5 Bank/ 5 Player/ 4 Bank after the first 5 Bank in a row. The first 5 Bank are easy as it is already strong Bank and 1 Player. The rest is not an easy section unless you set up to follow Bank after seeing 5 Bank and 5 Player in a row and then 1 Bank. That is one typically can either track for 2 repeated streaks or more than 2 repeated streaks. Then unfortunately, the 4x switch breaks fast enough, but at least there are 3 Bank in a row.

There will always be some sections of some shoes that go right against your selection. Some people claim to have alien tech that can shift gears and adapt so easily. With a lot of follow expect more follow until it doesn't.

I am now around 100% focused on management and execution, 0% on selection, and 0% on progressions as that is my challenge.

 

I am always grateful to you.

 

I always thank you for your kindness.
I am currently studying Sputnik’s plan as much as possible, but I always fail at this part. I want to understand what I am doing wrong. Do you have any plans among your various strategies that you could recommend to users? It might be impolite to ask, but I would like to share, play, and discuss together.

 

Just looking at the majority of the last 5 starting from hand 3 of what you posted.
W W L W W W W W L L L W W L L L W L W L W W W L W L L L

15 W - 13 L

The shoe is almost all Bank except the 5 Player in a row...

- You can keep working on this selection Sputnik has posted.
- You can also try Follow that cps10 posted.
- You can also try:

 

Is the base bet always on Bank? If PP comes out, do you switch to Player? Do you switch if BP comes out? And does the streak always start after the series ends? Does it start after PPPP B? I apologize if this is unclear; I'm asking again because English is not my native language and I didn't fully understand using Google Translate.

 

Could you explain why this is a winning sequence? According to Sputnik's March Theory, doesn’t it assume that patterns like 1-2-3 or 3-2-1 do not repeat consecutively? In this case, is this code based on treating PBBPPP as separate segments (P BB PPP) and assuming that the pattern will not repeat?

 

112: BPBB or PBPP you are looking for a repeat anywhere in the string

113: BPBBB or PBPPP

12: BPP or PBB

2: BB or PP

etc

 

Hello, I see some action - sorry for not reading all - but I will mention one side project ...
Look at this and have some fun with observation and exploring ...

333 W
332 W
331 W
323 W
313 LW
322 W
311 LL
312 LW
321 W

111 LL
112 LW
113 LW
121 W
131 W
122 W
123 W
132 W
131 W

222 W
221 W
223 W
212 LW
232 W
211 LL
213 LW
233 W
231 W

I don't have to brag - people know me for who I am - feel free to find a better way to explore baccarat variance -
This is as tight as you get with the selection process ...

8 versus 1
But you want to build selection upon the pendulum effect.
Less bets but you will win year after year using fibo ...
Skip the idea of living - maybe an alternative to an interesting account ...

I don't have any solution for baccarat but I will show the idea of laying the favorite with UK/Irland races ...

111
112 and so on is the string when a horse has lost the selection

111 LL
112 LW
113 LW
121 W
131 W
122 W
123 W
132 W
131 W

LLL
LLW
LLW
LWL
LWL
LWW
LWW
LWW
LWL

So when there is a pendulum effect where LLL strike and repeat at least two times with one winning sequcence.

LLL
LLL
LWW

Then I know that two more LLL and LLL will be a window of 2.5 STDV

And

LLL
LLL
LLL and beyond will be 3 STDV or more ...
LWL

And here we attack with fibo to catch regression ... and we are not talking 50%-50% as we have 8 versus 1
So you will feel the power ...

This can be done simulations with all three
The horse race system Little Acorn Gold for the exchanges selection (odds filter) is clear and valid.
But the sequence when to enter sucks - but even so - he bust once during 8 years ...
And still well over in profit ...
Take that and explore ... no bullshit ... actually stats based upon same stats and probability as EC ...
The difference is that he gets around 25 qualifiers each month versus 8 years - so the universe of random bits is not that huge. ..

This is not working with the other two ... in the same way ...
But you can look at it in the following way - 8 versus 1 and the underrepresented sequence show two or more you have the odds favoring you.
Pendulum and regression towards the mean - math and probability on your side - no guess work or crystal ball ... just facts ...

333 W
332 W
331 W
323 W
313 LW
322 W
311 LL
312 LW
321 W

...

222 W
221 W
223 W
212 LW
232 W
211 LL
213 LW
233 W
231 W

Here you can use 311 and 211 for trigger ...
311
311
323
You get the idea ...

Note following ...

I have tested and you can test - 111 and 211 and 311 don't perform with 50% strike ratio ...
Because of the nature of variance and that the idea of as many series and singles are screwd up with this methodology ...
Can not explain it or the correlation ... more then is favoring you and not the other way around ...

Cheers Patrik

 

Forgot to mention that each trail indenpendency apply to gathering data ...

So one losing horse and two winning
LWW

Then it can follow by 332 and 223 then you skip them until next 111 or 123 or 122 sequcne appear
So is like fine tune and pick out the specific 1s distribution among the 333 and 222 distributions ...

So each betting attack is two LLL
L trigger
LL bet bet

So

LLL
LLL
LLL
LWL
L bet bet
L bet bet

So a 12 fibo cover three levels
15 extended four levels

LLL
LLL
LWL
LLL
LLL
LWL
LLL
LLL
LWL
LLL
LLL

Look it up 18 versus 3

Or can be

LLL
LLL
LLL
LLL
LWW
LLL
LLL
LWL
LLL
LLL
LLL
LLL
LWW
LLL
LLL
LLL
LWL
LLL
LLL

Is will not happen I miljons ...

Cheers ...


Cheers ...

 

Patrik

Great stuff as usual! Let me ask you this - I have been working on a horse racing system that bases the plays on past records without your traditional handicapping methods. I have years of data that back up these methods. And whereas I’m winning a lot of money with it, I feel my staking strategy needs a lot of work to maximize my profits. Are you experienced in staking for this type of thing?

You have my email. Send me note if you have some information for me.

 

Hi Sputnik , i have also dive a lot on series things but i am doing the opposite , why we dont play something that happens more instead of higher series then 1? That is what i can't understand from you !

No matter how many inputs we add series 1 will always dominate! I also like cycle in general(that means i don't play only series 1 ) so i do combine series to make cycles if that can give more ideas to the ones that are interested...

Here is a run of 5k spins and the hits of series :


5000
Series 1 1265
Series 2 625
Series 3 308
Series 4 157
Series 5 82
Series 6 46
Series 7 12
Series 8 13
Series 9 4
Series 10 1
Series 11 1
Series 12 0
Series 13 0
Series 14 0
Series 15 0
Series 16 0
Series 17 0
Series 18 0
Series 19 0
Series 20 0
Series 21 0
Series 22 0
Series 23 0
Series 24 0
Series 25 0
Series 26 0
Series 27 0
Series 28 0
Series 29 0
Series 30 0
Series 31 0
Series 32 0
Series 33 0
Series 34 0
Series 35 0
Series 36 0

 

atrox23 and CPS10

First atrox, there are as many series as there are singles
But cluster them into 1/3 and magic happens

cps10, can you pm your work mail again
Then I will send you the compounding and a little accorn full PDF

 

Sputnik, thank you for writing so much. But I don't understand anything. It'll be great if I could learn something valuable to add to the system that I built based off of my own preferences.