Baccarat Cracked it! Baccarat can be beaten

YOU BAD MAN
YOU STOPPED THE WAITER FROM PUBLISHING
THE WORD WILL KNOW ITS YOU SOXFAN
YOU ARE THE 12 MONKEY EVENT

LMAO LMAO LMAO LMAO thats some fkup thinking right there LMAO thats complete returdation in its purest form, you SOXFAN getting blamed for the NON PUBLICATION of a BOOK that IS THE HOLY GRAIL TO ALL events of ANY RANDOM OUTCUMS ( LMAO LMAO )
THE WORLD WILL KNOW ITS YOU SOXFAN LMAO epic my back is sore ,my stomach is sore and my face is sore from LAUGHING MY ASS OFF haaahhaaahhahhhhhhhaaaaaa

Priceless now we have someone to blame
YES sir it was soxfan
Yes mamm it was soxfan , hes the one to blame , lets lynch him
YOU evil man evil evil evil man soxfan with all the crap on the planet YOU had TO BE JUST EVIL and stop that waiter Matt Damon from publishing a non existent system in an non existent book. SHAME
SHAME
SHAME
SHAME
LMAO
OH the HORROR

 

Tablone I don't want to offend you, but I notice that you don't speak like a true gambler, my opinion.
Paper testing any market, sport, forex, casino games are not the same using real money with or without human pressure.
Laurance Scott once says that playing the game change the game.
That means when you put up with real money is not a walk in the park wish might be the feeling when testing.

John Patrick is spot on when he talks about Scared Money.
Assume you know how to make and win 30.000 Euro - this not mean you can start betting 10 Euro bets or higher even if you have the bankroll.
Human pressure my friend is one among many enemies besides losing and winning.
Playing around with 1/2 Euro and make some mistakes and move on into the comfort zone to get to know the method with live-action.
Then someone can move up to staking 5 Euro and stay at that level and find a comfort zone.
Now after some months playing you might place 10 Euro bets.

That is how a professional tackle life at the tables, my opinion.
Same with sports betting.
I have a core method with two years of placed bets on Spreadsheet and i can play the method and make the same sport selections.
He made 7000 Euro a year.

Now I don't jump into conclusion and staking 10 or 20 Euro stakes and try to achieve the same thing and quit working for a living.
I start with 5 Euro and feel my comfort zone and grow stronger as a gambler and become mature with the method and maybe after six months placing 10 Euro bets.

This is how gamblers talks and tackle real life, or at least I do.
Tablone you don't mention things like that and that is the reason you don't earn my respect.

Cheers

 

Good post ,excellent stage by stage steps to get to a higher unit denomination safley, well written , good post but of course this means nothing now because of soxfan. Shame,
Shame

 

Yes huge difference between sim junkies and degen gamblers and prof gamblers

 

I particularly liked the part where he knows everything about Reading Randomness and just passes over it nonchalantly as if it were a stepping stone to his higher intellect. He knows all about the global effect and the elegant patterns, a topic that has never been discussed very much on any gambling forums. He's like a magic Zen Master. Just claim anything you want and let them approach at their own peril. Everything is descending as I alone hold the top. Yikes.

 

What next ? The rolling betting horizon .

 

Sputnik, I agree up until a point. What you wrote is true more of negative progression, in that the bettor hits a wall at the table, does not have enough bankroll, and/or losses his bottle, fear factor sets in as he doubts his system. But when flat betting a system the real world is represented moreover so that in reality of playing it, the wins v losses mirror the testing done, there is no difference, you will find streaks of wins and of losses, and either the system works so you'll find more wins than losses on the whole or if it does not work then more losses than wins.

I don't agree with you however that having tested a system over thousands of outcomes that it somehow fails in and of itself when applied using all of its rules. If all of a system's rules are applied and it is a winning system, it is thus illogical that it might suddenly not work moreover in a fair run un manipulated game. I ran my system over the stock market which produce similar outcomes as baccarat and the results were similar, more wins than losses.

In the real world were I to wager using my system I don't see any reason why it should fail save I come across a losing streak which I would argue could happen would would not deem my system flawed given that I have factored in for such events and flat betting only will overcome these wrose times which don't crop up that often, thus the more wins will override losses even streaks of losses since the appearance of streaks of losses does not negate wins or diminish the possibility for streaks of wins.

 

I am thinking about a way to prove my system by winning using it just to silence the doubters, though I am aware that even these attempts might be seen as fake since it's hard to prove true winnings. There is one way I can prove my system overtime and that would be to declare when a stock market will go up or down on certain days, the day before the end of the closing on the following day.

If I can show more wins than losses, more winning days, (notwithstanding that many more points over even money chances will be gained) then I would have proven my system on that market which does not differ from baccarat or roulette because the outcomes up/down, bank/player red/black....outside chances, produce the same patterns, same combinations and the same trends, and my bet selections overcome all of this.

Once I prove my system on such a live event everyone can gain access to the results of those outcomes, then I should be able to convince the doubters, save that they come up with more doubts which might say more about them not being able to face and/or accept reality due to psychological disturbances and/or disorders of the mind or possibly due to jealousy.

 

Never pay any money for any gambling system. They are all a scam .

 

That's a pretty dumb statement to make. The logic of your statement makes no sense. Firstly you don't even know what a system is. A system is a set of rules. To state that "all" "systems" are "scams" is to state that "all rules are scams", thus you're thinking has errors.

You make sweeping statements, but intelligent people can see through your illogical thinking.

If you mean that all systems don't work or that no systems work and therefore selling any is a scam, then state this, but be clear about what you mean. Give some thought about what you mean before your finger(s) start to move on your keyboard...engage your brain first.

 

Typical reply of a scammer .

 

Evidence?
You have none, therefore you're a guilty of a libel.
The only scammer is your illogical thinking.

 

I'm about halfway through my book. Of course I was thinking of publishing, but then I'm having second thoughts. I'm not saying I have the HG, but it's pretty well up there close to it. It's a universal strategy that can be applied to a number of casino games and to stock markets and forex etc. No matter what the random combinations are my strategy overcomes to attain profits. 5+ to 10+ units in a session is well within reach. There are way more wins than losses. Flat betting is key to proving the viability of any strategy. With stock market, forex and the like, many more units/pips/points can be gained thus lots of money can be made.

If I sell to so few people, I will limit myself save using my strategy to make money. And then there are other languages to consider. I think proving my strategy can win proper is the key, so that people do not doubt it. Otherwise it's just another run of the mill strategy which this is far from being. The only way I see that I can prove it before selling it is stating the ups/downs of stock markets before the event overtime thus anyone can see how many wins over losses and moreover how many units gained on winning days less losing days with stop losses taken into account of positions are not left open. This is the most honest way forward, and by proving it works I will increase the value of my strategy.

 

Epic lmao

 

As long as one of the language is NOT returd I say good luck to you, I am interested in English of course of your offer re stock next day- or + . Say daily for a month excluding weekend of course. Very small sample size I know but at least it’s not a simulation of a gazillion years plus one.
Cheers

 

Bbbbbwwwwwwwwwwwwaaaaaaaaaaaaaah how so, because I mock the nutjob, retard, coconut and scammer, oh my, hey hey.
?

 

Seriously, if a cat got a true winning style, that allow him to capture even one units profits per shoe then in fairly short order he should be able to earn a six figure annual income. So, why would a shrewd cat with a true winning style go through the time and effort to write the book, and market it to sell a handful of copy for peanut? Zeus knows that don't make no sense to me, hey hey.

 

What use are you to such forums Soxfan?
Why gain one unit per shoe when you could gain five+?

 

I'll publish my strategy predictions on twitter because posts cannot be edited are date/time stamped. I'll cover U.S. and UK markets. I'll begin from Monday 20th July, will only post when a bet is on, otherwise no posts. Will do this for one month as you write, approx 20 trading days. Results will be how many wins over losses and how many points were gained from close to close, not including the overnight and/or day highs and lows. Thus if market was 100 at close and I stated will up, if the price is anything over 100 the following close I win, if not I lose. For a losing outcome I'm setting my stop loss to -35 with options to keep it open in the real world, but what's important is the wins over losses i.e. how many outcomes are correct/incorrect. Does this sound fair?

 

If the system is as you wrote "non existent" then I have nothing to prove, right? Therefore my efforts would be wasted on you. So be it, can't say I had not tried to prove it works. Therefore says more about you being on a gambling forum...why are you even here? Must have real issues. No, not bother, we don't want to know why, must be a sad story. Oh well, it takes all sorts I guess.