Roulette Figure it out

Oh look zero match at 4x its ok, free money.

 

Oh not again 4x zero match , is this real? Or are you guys cherry picking session!!

 

Easy one !

 

Naughty do yourself a favor (other people should do this to if you want to test properly)

A. Start your system.

B. (example) you place your bet(s) say number 1. You start and stop somewhere betting this number.

1 1 (whatever reason start)
2 1
3 1
4 1
5 1
6 1 (whatever reason stop)

Now according to your rules have play number 1 for 6 spins. (whatever the rules were)

Do this next.

A. Pick any number lets say number 36. Play this number the exact same spins as above. IMPORTANT if it hits just keep playing it, the spins have to be te same size (important)

1 36
2 36
3 36
4 36 (HIT)
5 36
6 36 (HIT)

Now do this comparison a few hundred times. WILL you see a difference in the gaps and hit rate. I prommise you this is the only way to see if your system has merit!

 

forget the R-simulator, it has nothing to do with the real spins of the roulette wheel...

 

I am running on bad luck as i can't se math here!

 

Sergio i also have done test with thousand of live roulette. No big deal..The whole forum id based on RS and RX what is the point!

 

I haven't seen that number 6 anywhere , a new element on our journey !

 

I use real stays in Rx, never with the random Rx.
In the R-simulator, everything works much better.
Are you sure that what I have mentioned you have done exactly as I did and it has not worked for you?

 

This is what I mean.

 

Now according to your rules have play number 1 for 6 spins. (whatever the rules were)
Ka2 this is why you test and say everything lose. I am not playing 1 number for 6 spins.

 

This is a big NO because as we know on forums they give just an example so what you would answer to yourself about this !

 

If that is exactly what you mean i HAVE done that nothing special sometimes is there sometimes not !

 

Ka2; not playing 1 number. Same stream that atrox will find 1 losing section of 12 spins.
Guess he won't run the numbers.

See the 1st spin #3 stream is now 118 spins.
Ka2 you carry on blindly testing on what you think some show.

 

NBN with all the respect what you are doing is so awful, knowing what to do and pointing at other that trying to find the way sucks ..
How many times we have to say we are looking for something that we don't know how it looks like!

SERGIO as we are applying math here what is the diff between number 1 on RS and number 1 on real wheel? Ass rrbb said so beneath the point!

 

Lord.... this was an EXAMPLE on how to test your system!!! You have RULES dont you.

AGAIN:

you play number x for y spins

x was 6 spins

now pick a random number

also play for 6 spins

next x

you play x for 21 spins

now pick a random number

also play for 21 spins

Do this a few hundred times.

COMPARE the data...

There SHOULD be a difference!!!

A see people just playing there system and also adding progressions left and right without knowing if there is a difference with random data. This is absolute madness!

 

Atrox, look, I'll give you a clear example so you can see what I mean. Although the progression can be done in different ways, I just want you to see the mechanism. The same can be done for top1, top3, etc.
If we know the average number of hits per row in which our topX works, we can know how to attack with the progression.

https://mega.nz/file/gV1F0agQ#lEibxxawJwiKXaM35Qg9xrLL-BEVS8TQlLs7hLAavBQ

 

Ka2 I'm not going to use you idea.
This continuous stream of the 1/37 quoted by you experts has made +300. If the BR was big enough to use (cough MJ) top dog 25 unit would it make the TG quote take 3'000 to win 3'000.




Karl I learnt from using FOBT in UK.
It plays just as live wheel as shown from the DSAA 10'330 live spins. Random org that DSAA champions; airball and those posted Live german spins.
Non-hit average is 9-7-5-3 & 30 at 60 spins. Repeats the reverse 1-3-5-7-& 30

 

Oh dear some members need to test there own ways like Ka2 and find everything loses
ROFL

 

SERGIO what i don't understand is why you think that you have tried things that we don't have? The only who can say that is the creator of a system.. I HAVE DONE THAT. Never is stable even with the AVG you are talking about.. I don't think you either have the way just working for now.