Roulette Figure it out

Yup, I also do not see an advantage in reducing the field of play to 1 dozen. I've tested Denzie system this way, regular top 3 horse race, all 12 numbers horse race, all with different MM. Considering that any dozen can go cold at any moment for... 40 spins, I've even tried isolating my "playing dozen" so that hits on 2 others would result in a draw or a small profit. All approaches lost long term.

 

As Denzie and Nimo say, there are several possibilities to use Turbo data, the problem is that you have to understand that it requires a big box, whether you use a dynamic or aggressive progression.
There is no way to win flat unless you are willing to accept having to play some 300 ball sessions or wait for the right moments to win.
You have to accept that without a good box, sessions with a large spread cannot be beaten.
There is no other option!
Or the other option is to keep working to find something that you can actually win flat in the short term, but that requires a lot more work and analysis.

 

We are not talking possibilities here but a solution to something that we base everything in math that is always there , it seems the math is the right progression + selection of numbers, and why you point the (you) and not include yourself also?

 

Mr. Atrox, I've been sending you messages and I see that if I don't give you what you want, you are not able to respond or say anything, you only want us to tell you how to do it and nothing else, you don't do your part and you only demand.
For my part, I have been working for many years and I have many very good things, but I don't see you putting work on the table and wanting to solve it, you only want to be told how and when and without contributing anything.
On the other hand, there are other people that we do talk to privately and we are reaching several very interesting and logical conclusions.
We do not have to be guided only by the people in the forums, but also by our own work and experience, based on that, you will achieve it before demanding that people give it to you.

 

I don't know if you notice but i blocket you bcs you had nothing better then what i have so i have to go to someone that is better then me to learn,so all the above is false ,that is why i didn't respond and i didnt ask you anything so we have both sides to have an opinion..
Now the problem is that what you think what you doing, others have not reach there , that is false also. I have done whatever you send me and if you have more i have done it, so the main problem is the progression. your selection was not better then mine.

We are talking open here as YOU started saying you like to share , to share what? What already is shared years ago. Just ideas and missliding away from the solution..

 

Look, I'll tell you something simple to prove that has nothing to do with Turbo, just to make you think more focused on what Vaddis was saying.

Take 8 balls, play those 7-8 numbers.
Keep playing and adding numbers up to the 16th ball.
You'll see that it hits almost every cycle so that there is a repeat in 16 spins.
Whenever there is a repeat, restart from the last 8 balls.
Now notice, when you don't hit in 16 spins, if you restart looking at the last 8 spins and repeat the process, notice how it repeats with certainty in the second cycle from 8 to 16 spins and notice also how there is a great concentration of repeats.
The same thing happens if you take 4 pairs and play up to the 8 balls adding pairs, when there is no pair or repeat, in the next cycle from 4 to 8, you'll find at least 1, but most of the time, there is a concentration of hits.
This is one way to hunt for repeats.
From 1x to 2x or from 1x +0x to 2x+1x.

This information is really useful to go down another line of thinking and there are several people who have shared data on when the first 2x, 3x, 4x happens... I hope this makes you think and look for other ways and not just blind yourself to what others say.

 

I'm not going to enter into a debate, but I started to share something with you to see what you knew and see if you shared anything.
Everything you said was that you knew everything and nothing worked in a negative way and believing yourself superior, when I hadn't started to share, but seeing that you were negative and didn't share anything and your behavior was to believe yourself superior to others, I decided to wait to see what you shared.
What did you share? NOTHING!
I share things with other people, just like they share with me, with you, what am I going to share if you already know everything? Hahaha.
I've been in this for 20 years, my friend, I know what you want and how you want it, I know you have nothing to teach and I do, and a lot!

 

This information does nothing to me.. About repeats we have the strongest prof from rrbb where they repeat and we still can't win without knowing the way.. So don't make me thing in another path as there are already 10 paths why do i have to add one more?
Here are the repeats for each sett , so what?

 

This trick is old..

 

I don't know what you're doing but it has nothing to do with what I do, but I'll tell you something interesting that can be focused on what you do or even Denzie or some others talk about.
I imagine that those are the first 4 of 2x and their outputs right?
Look how their outputs are decaying.
Have you thought that maybe you have something in sight and you don't see it.
I really saw an interesting idea and it will surely work.
I'll explain it to you, friend.
Take the first 4 of 2x as you just did.
Write them down and see when they occur again and forget about the horse race.
When one comes out at 3x write down the balls that it took and so on with the 4 numbers.
Don't you think you can do something to win based on the Turbo interval?
I'll leave it there, friend!

 

Oh! By the way!
You're welcome!

 

I have done that with 3 pairs it is the same thing , i will say it again the problem on this game is that you think have thought things that other not.
Better leave it there as it is nothing new that will make a difference.

 

Make an excel with the following.
Let it mark all the numbers at 2x and from there mark the distance between each number's hit.
You'll see what happens.
If you can, share the excel.
Thanks

 

I have done that!

 

I don't understand what all that means
Something simpler, my friend.
Like the photo I sent you.

 

This is what I earned from what I just sent you...

 

I can prove that whatever you think i already have it in excel that is how much work i have add on it! So the first excel i did post that was a share!

 

Start at the begging and see where each number correspond and you will see..

And what is this only fo 2x ?

 

Some of this is what Denzie refers to in some message or something similar.
This can be used!

 

It is about taking the first 2x and keeping control of the outputs of only those numbers.