Roulette Figure it out

https://www.rouletteman.com/probability-calculator/


Notice the differentials in the 3rd-column? Say you are betting DZ 1u flat. With 1u, on each next spin you buy less & less probability of a hit on every next spin.

1st-spin .. 32.432%
2nd-spin .. ≈20%
3rd-spin .. ≈15%
4th-spin .. ≈10%
5th-spin .. ≈6%
6th-spin .. ≈5%
--------------------------
7th-spin .. ≈3.5%
8th-spin .. ≈2%
9th-spin .. ≈1.5%
10th-spin .. ≈1%
11th-spin .. <1%
---------------------------
etc.

So, with 4-5-6 units you bought betwesn 80-90% of available probability. After that, if you decide to finance it you can buy only 10% extra, & that dozen can be quiescent for another +35-spins, at its most extreme.

So, my questions is, why would you finance any of that, in the first place !?!

 

Now, let's say that you play 3 dozen areas, shichever & whatever bets within .....

Doesn't it seem to you financially viable to pause→resume the play in such an area after 4-5-6 spins no-appearance ..

You fund the most likely range of hits .. whatever exact range pleases you, can be dynamically adjusted too (rule for 4, rule for 5 rule for 6) .. & avoid huge drawdowns (in) cost by NOT funding the longer no-appearance streaks.

Then Resume betting on the area on the next appearance.


In the meantime, you ARE on the areas that are currently active.

Two dozens are hitting, you are there.
One dozen is hitting, you are there.
All three dozens are hitting, you are everywhere.
Hitting within ≈90%.


That gives you high-level template, within which you run your low(er)-level base-system.
Betting SU, fine. Progressing in-risk till SU, your bankroll-requirement is lower.
Progressing & regressing between EC & SU, according to the exposition, you bnkrl-req. is even lower.


Be where the game is.

 

Got it?

 

We are focused here on top 3-4 straight up numbers, when that probability drops for a dozen 3.5 at spin 7 what it will be for str8 numbers, the dozen may hit but not my target.

Your strategy leverages probability awareness and bankroll preservation by focusing on high-probability intervals and minimizing exposure to less likely scenarios, I was adapting something similar to interval for str8 as they are different from dozens..

 

I am more arrogant than you.

 

What we are comparing here so you are more then me?

 

I would not be playing those 3-4 numbers .. in a dozen that passed 80-90% no appearance of anything in that dz, until smth strucks again.

If that smth's exactly that, one of those number, so be it ..

Sure you have back-up candidates, top X ... to play 3-4 in the active dzns.
& columns too .......

 

I wouldn't be playing such dz, let alone smth in it.

 

Olá, estou muito interessado no assunto, venho apostando em role 3 anos e estou tentando aprimorar meu conhecimento, sabe se tem algum grupo de whatsapp ou telegram em que possamos dialogar?

 

I can't understand you buddy sorry. When I am playing top numbers for each dozen and you say I wouldn't play those 3-4 numbers doesn't make sense on the thread we are or am I missing something...

 

My email address appears in my profile so you can contact me.

 

If you are playing all 3 dozens, as separate games with each with 3-4 numbers on each of those ..
After 4-5-6 spins a dozen no-show at all→ omit placing the chips within that dz till the next show.
Also run 3 separate local-balances + the global-balance→ restart local game on plus, restart the whole thing on global plus.
Might include further filtering of SU-positions within dozens, based on other other+probability ... columns, ds, whatever.

Was the spoon full?

 

When I say, I don't know for others playing top 3 that is a plus from all three dozens which means 1/3 dozen. Now what you are describing I don't know if is an idea or something you have worked out. . I have the excel for what you are describing plus the three different banks, after 4,5,6 attempts I stop and that attack on particular dozen lost ,again the way you are laying it it will not work, I can stop and I start again after it strike and again after 4,5,6 attempts I stop and that attack on particular dozen lost. Etc.

If you are asking if what was given or done met the needs or expectations, similar to asking if something was adequate or fulfilling about the spoon I don't think so. I can't get your-s joke about the spoon thing but if that makes you feel better I am happy bcs no one here did feed anyone..

 

Allegedly, what you are doing doesn't work. Plus who the fuck knows what exactly are you doing within thd dozens. & also, what doesn't work means.

Do you really think you gonna nail it in one coding + without any manual review of what is happening.

I've been working on, perfecting one setting, one fundamental set of principles for 2.5 years .. manually, to get it just right, over 15x major upgrades. One of them is the template I mentioned. & that doesn't mean it works 100% of the time, as a base-system module primed at 99.75%, & for good reason I am not even going to go in here to, & with an ultra-low bankroll = way less than even 100u. There's other modules, all working in unison, to make near-perfect 100% = +99.9999%, or less than 0.0001 of fatal-error.

Reading your posts, seems to me you are jumping around, cynically complaining.
Mind, its not my problem, if you can't make it work.

Go within, transform your self, & with that's going to transform the system, as externalised-self.


PS: First-step, play those local-games flat, to begin with (& denitely do NOT negative vertical progression, that would imbalance 6he local-games' cost/returns, by design wreaking hagoc & make things go haywire) ... observe what actually happens when sim is done taking out the hardest-games, isolate them, make your code print them out, as csv xlsx whatever smth tabular with bets, balances specified, don't glance at the chart & g... the f... up, duh ... improve on them, identify the flaw & design the improvements ... then start upgrading the shit, that fundamental-setting into, iterating into variants .. & again, & so on & so forth ... test out adding various things to it, amalmagate & push it to the max.

Then you say can it didn't work .. & if it really did not, go the drawing board & start anew, with all that extra knowledge, that repeirtoire of tools in your bag, & refine .. With enough major upgrades, you might just get to be & do what you intend to do know.


Its clear why guys stop spooning or forking or knifing or whatever.

 

Look thereddiamanthe I like your posts and have read a lot of them. I have created all kinds of excel just for outputting me the desired results I want to see, everything is made one by one spin added by me so I can observe what is going on.
Now I am jumping around on same target as we are on turbo thing but in general roulette, if it looks like I am complaining I am not, but people are full of puzzle and 100 ideas of different person's for the same subject. When you come to here and post something that has to do with this subject you need to be prepared as member's will have questions to do for sure..
I don't disagree that you've been working on for long as we all are doing, I have three screens on my desktop not a Hi-Tech but they doing theire job, one for my sheets one for the table and one reading a lot, I have put a dead end to this as first is a challenge for me then it will make my existence life better as the most are fighting for that.
Now that's true "who the fack knows what I am doing" that means I can suppose the same for all those who have posted the way but not the way if that make sense!
I really I am happy for you even if i can't show that, that you have achieved a lvl and you have found something as final solution based.
I am doing my best believe me as others for them , maby I can't go further and I don't mind if they stop spooning or forking or knifing or whatever. There is no way to find the way if the creator don't give you at least how is done so you can improve it. I know you and others will say its all here, well I don't think all us who still are trying are so stupid and combining all the ways each of us has tried no one has reached your lvl 99.75%.

 

You got it in one TRD

 

It was such a simple way to avoid long losing streaks and explained well, that I don't even know you had to post about it more heh. Thanks.

 

Ok guys , i still do test and i am NOT COMPLAINING ..
I did go back to top 1 , but i think we have to keep in mind the other runners that are on the same lvl as each X, at the end one off them will pass not all, but we have to combine the interval for each number as we are hunting better then 1/35 , they will be different from each other.. You keep going on each X until a new high or even.. And still with progression not flat yet!

 

You're absolutely correct, I said too much !!
Just remember ME every time when you are taking that to the bank ..