Roulette Figure it out

Turbogenius dijo:

Si esta apostando en todo momento lo está haciendo mal, así que averigua cuando debes comenzar a apostar antes de inventar cualquier progresion.
Luego ya crearas una progresión que funcione en todos los casos que se puedan dar.
Saludos.

 

So that is what i am trying to find, how else can i figure that entry point without loosing one more year from y life?

 

Mira Atrox23 ,sólo te puedo decir que cuando la cabeza te haga click,todo el tiempo que hayas invertido en descubrirlo habrá valido la pena.

Lee y vuelve a leer posts,prueba online sin apostar,vuelve a probar con historiales hasta que lo consigas.
Así lo hice yo.
Saludos.

 

Look Yoigo i appreciate participating but what you are saying doesn't help, on the other side you don't have to help. I know that i have read and re-read, i know that we have to figure out, so those are things that we know, what i am trying to find is things i don't know.
Don't misunderstand me ..

 

Está casi todo en éste mismo hilo y en repetidores tercera parte, no puedo decir más ,como dijo turbo eso seria pasar la linea roja.
Saludos y suerte.

 

That big jump was stupid but i did double up on a win 3 times then i reset !!!!

 

Hi
I have created couple of excel sheet for cycle analysis from 1- 37 and 1 - 72 spin
73 -108 and further
And tried couple of variation hot dogs from first cycle to second cycle and finally gave up

I would like to work with you if you have can share what you are looking for with regards to repeater

 

So, this is a LOTT. 24 non-hit 13 repeat, 24/13.
How different can the score be +/- for repeat.
Just for you. Repeats average from the DSAA 10'330 live spins shows as in blocks of 10 spins 1-3-5-7. At 60 spins from the DSAA it shows usually as 30/30.
So, here test for 40 spins has 24/16 the 24 is LOTT@37 spins.
I've seen zero repeats in 20 spins. Also quoted by other members.
You can also get 5 repeats in spins 1-10

If you can see non-hit are hitting fast then like Winkle says how do they stop? Repeat must start or are we going to the 37 can hit in 37.

 

Here is my theory about the "not sharing" or "Turbo told me to not reveal it" or "casinos will change rules".
Casinos wont change roulette rules, what would they do? Further lower the odds surely that'd draw regulators on their heads. Remove roulette from their offer because few people win consistently? They'll just block you from entry or online account thats all.
I feel folks that "have it" are afraid to share in case someone proves well, they were just lucky for a long time.
Plus all say it needs progression, so SHARE just the selection logic without progression I think everyone can figure that part out in their own and tailor to own money mgm.
Telling us to re-read something 1000 times won't change a thing if context doesn't change, so why don't someone take a leap and share just the selection step by step, without bullshit especially that not all that "have it" select, drop and change numbers same way.

 

EXACTLY..

 

Does anyone know of a platform where we can communicate with each other who want to work together?

 

Zoom could work i guess! Telegram!!

 

I have never understood it either, GIGI. Because there are people here who have been working hard for years, doing hundreds of tests and variations and we still haven't managed to see the right approach. Would it be so difficult to reveal the right approach in a private group or by email to interested people who have worked on turbo theories for a long time? or even in the forum with closer and more suitable clues?
What would that change for casinos when 99.99% of people lose compulsively?
I will never understand it. Sometimes the clues are even further from reality. Is it really helpful?
I have always thought that even if the winning system was displayed on the casino door, nobody would pay attention to it, because the vast majority of people play for pure pleasure, compulsively, they are not analytical or patient, and they would not even stop to read in detail to analyze and put into practice.
Anyway, I leave the reflection there. In any case, I respect every decision even if I do not share the position.

 

Exactly this. They’ll never remove this game, but they will limit your playing. Just like blackjack. Numerous people won and beat the house. Yet, the game is still available. Only the AP’s are limited to playing. Roulette is here to stay.

Now the part about “not sharing” can be debunked. This is just my opinion only.
I feel people are hesitant about revealing certain strategies is for fear someone stealing their strat and then monetizing it for their own gain and taking all the credit, while the originator will be called the fraud and accused of stealing someone else’s work.
I’ve shared strategies before and there’s still more to come once I get my unmotivated ass to write something. But there’s one thing I never share with people: my methods. That’s one thing I’ll never go into details. For example, when to stop, and switch to another strat, or what to do when a player encounters a chop, a single or double. The real questions to ask ourselves is, “Do I continue following the trend, or do I do the opposite of what the trend is doing”. Everyone has their own way of doing things.
One thing I do know, is that cycles will repeat and timing will be the key. Does it work? Sure. Does it work 100% of the time? Definitely not.

Remember our good friend Scentanal? (Or whatever handle he went by) *thanks punk city for ingraining that name in my head*
New Cummer on this forum bragging about his methods like it was the greatest. Putting everyone else’s methods as trash.
What ever happened to him?
Well guess what!? He ended up giving away his methods and turns out it was garbage lol.
Someone did write to him, telling him the system was garbage and didn’t work. His response, “You’re doing it wrong. That’s why it isn’t working”

So that’s my take on why I don’t always reveal certain plays. I don’t want to hold your hand, I don’t want to explain all the details in my play, and I don’t to be bombarded with a shit-ton of questions. It’s out there for you to experiment with, do what you want to do with that information.

 

So Isn't this the same thing what we are facing now. What i sthe point to share that and showing what it does and not how ! We are going back again. For his system failure is the obvious if you don't know how is done to fail..

 

Don't ever give your secret away. Take it to the grave if you have to.

 

I believe everybody has to pave their own way to success somehow. There’s countless information just on this forum alone. The information is out there. You’ll just have to dig through all the pages to find them.

What works for me and the things I see; can’t be taught and it’s hard to put into words sometimes.

For the short time I've been a member on this forum, everything I’ve read, all the information I absorbed, the only information that stood out that I took away was incorporating what gizmo called “throw away bets”. This information alone helped improve my game with minimal losses.
I’ve changed up the definition a little and call it my “life line bets”. It’s mainly used when pattern or streaks are not present. I’ll just bet the table minimum on the outside before I drop my usual 30unit when the time is right.
No harm done. If I lose, I lose. If I win, bonus and add that to the rest.

Now, as for turbo he presented all that information in his threads. He’s done all he could do to set you up for success. I think the problem with a lot of the readers is they are overthinking the information. You gotta work with what you’re given. Incorporating everybody’s information is making this a bigger mess. Interpret his work on your own and feel free to change things up and make it your own. There are no right or wrong way to play roulette.

If someone were to tell you “that’s wrong! that’s not the way turbo plays” ask yourself “how the hell does he know how turbo plays”
Turbo himself did not reveal all. He took a lot of that information with him. Trust me.

 

Agree. But if I were to share my secrets, I’ll reserve them to strictly family only. No friends.
Friends can conjure up jealousy.

I wish to start my own Pelayo family

 

I think Telegram is a good option.
Who can create the group and share to enter the group?
Who should enter the group?
I think we should be a few who have been around for many years.

 

Why do we need a private group/chat? If we agree it should be in the open as it won't change anything in the grand scheme of things.
@SERGIO you wrote you've a working method not based on Turbo so why work on something new?