He visto una nueva afirmación absurda de que la falacia del jugador no es ...

Quos · Oct 29, 2021

Raf said: ↑

Exactly!

For example, in a 37-shot cycle the link between the first 24 and the next 13 can be exploited by not playing all the 13-shot games and this abstention is determined by a statistical analysis on a statistically valid sample of cycles.

I am attaching a graph showing 96,356 shots played at flat bet with a final result of +39.231 pieces and the cash flow described by the graph curve.

View attachment 15668
Click to expand...

Raf said: ↑

Exactly!

For example, in a 37-shot cycle the link between the first 24 and the next 13 can be exploited by not playing all the 13-shot games and this abstention is determined by a statistical analysis on a statistically valid sample of cycles.

I am attaching a graph showing 96,356 shots played at flat bet with a final result of +39.231 pieces and the cash flow described by the graph curve.

View attachment 15668
Click to expand...

Hola Raf, veo que eres Español al igual que yo.
¿Te importaría ofrecer más información al respecto si es posible?.
En mis practicas he visto cierta dependencia entre grupos de números según cantidad de aciertos, pero no se como manejar bien esta situación.
Si no deseas hacerlo en publico, mi email es: [removed]

Gracias de antemano.
Un saludo.

Log in or Sign up

He visto una nueva afirmación absurda de que la falacia del jugador no es ...

Quos Member

Share This Page

Log in or Sign up

He visto una nueva afirmación absurda de que la falacia del jugador no es ...

Quos Member

Share This Page

Useful Searches