Roulette How to make a winning roulette system/method

Not to add anything to this thread off topic but you need a basic lesson in trend following. Gambler's Fallacy is someone expecting that something is due. If you get 20 blacks in a row you must decide if you are going to take advantage of the streak at an earlier point. You do not have to expect anything is due other than a bet will either win or it will lose. A loss means that your guess did not win. You did not get in on a twenty in a row streak. But if your guess wins then you are on your way to how ever long the streak lasts. After that first win you are at no risk to continue.

The point of trend following is in being able to test the water without losing the title to your home. If you can't handle losing an even chance bet then you have no right gambling in the first place. Anyone that probes possible win streaks has the right to live with themselves without the ridicule of retarded opinions that are factually wrong. You found a catchy, well known axiom, and you tried to use it where it does not apply. So now, to save face, you need to prove that indicators in trends are gambler's fallacy. Don't attack the messenger. Just answer the question please.

 

So dont bring it up Mug
Will not converse with you again but please continue to hunt with the hounds and run with the foxes....i

 

You can't analyze data after the fact and act as if you discovered something when the so-called "trend" doesn't occur going forward. You have to make a hypothesis, track the data going forward, and see if your hypothesis was disconfirmed or not.

What would be required to disprove what you are saying? Simple question, gizmo. What would convince you that you are wrong?

 

If you are saying that no matter what logic I use I really mean that I have the expectation that something I hope for is due, then you are the one expecting that something is due. I can analyze data and see if a situation is continuing. If it ends on the next spin I still have no expectation. All I have done is recognize something that is continuing. I can analyze that situation as data, no matter if you say I can't. I'm not a rigid under educated person. I'm not anticipating that something must be due. If I see a sleeping dozen among the twelve dozens that I chart, (that hideous term again,) I can chose to get in on a win streak. But I can't do that if I don't make the first move. I can play a style that survives all the efforts to get in on a good trend. I can handle all the losses in my way of playing trends. I don't need to pretend that wishful thinking will get me what I want. I don't care if some of you think this is done by expecting something is due. Nothing is due, yet you people insist that I must be doing that nevertheless. I'm not. Just because you can't make trends work for you does not mean that I can't make them work for me.

This thread is about the concept that the most unlikely sequence of spins can be counted on to create a system or method as the title suggests. Let's get back to that.

 

B-R-B-B-R-B is an INDICATOR only in the true sense of the word


B-B-B-B either go with it , against it or ignore it . I would IGNORE it .

 

Gizmo, if you can't give a clear, cogent answer as to what would disconfirm your methodology, then that's a problem. So I'll ask you again, what sequence of results would demonstrate that you are wrong?

 

Still havent left as got caught up watching hunted but thinking about tonight and how to bet and then realised

and remembered why i first asked RG as he said

but if anyone else wants to announce a similar but simpler way of playing this please share as this could be useful in a casino.
Was still thinking of looking at 4 different numbers/pattern in each dozen but and only betting when they are are hit increasing/decreasing on cycles/hits etc and will give it a go tonight.

 

OK commander, yes, I will answer your question if the one I asked already ever gets answered. To JBS : "So now, to save face, you need to prove that indicators in trends are gambler's fallacy. Don't attack the messenger. Just answer the question please."

As far as you are concerned you must ask yourself why I should dis-confirm everything I have learned in the past 20 years just to give you some satisfaction that you think is significant. I could tell you why looking for opportunities is like counting cards but frankly you need to dis-confirm my methodology. It's your question. Find your own answers why using trends for opportunities doesn't work. In fact prove it. Now it's both of your's question.