Baccarat How you recognize trends/event's starting point?

Yes. The more advanced form of this is targeting micro trends. That's trends that last from 3 to 4 spins or hands. I look for that to swarm and just go after one win from each one that I try.

 

Yes. I teach that also in Reading Randomness.

The absence of any recognizable form is like describing what you see as chaos. But once you can see that there is nothing there then all you have to do is ask yourself what would happen if chaos continued. Chaos is a formation also. You see it jumping all over the place without forms of any kind. None of the characteristics are consistent. It's just a matter of deciding what would happen if nothing continues. There's intermittent singles strewn with wild doubles then triples. Then there are an absence of singles but just for 3 times in and then that changes. It's all wild chaos. You can play it for what it would do next if chaos were to continue or you could get out of the session.

 

In Baccarat or Craps you have one data stream made up of two choices for EC bets. In Roulette I track 6 groups made up from 12 sets. So when one groups is chaotic another might be in a phase of a strong win streak.

 

Bullshit!

 

Cats can let me know when/if they can prove their trendings/guessings style can win more than 50% decision buckin up against a minimum of 1000 tested shoe, hey hey.

 

For some reason I don't feel like providing that proof. Go figure.

My plan is to teach it and to let those results speak for themselves to those that make the effort to learn it.

Leaving the skeptics behind is my end result. I'm using human nature as a weapon. Tell them the truth and then give the skeptics just enough rope to hang themselves. Meanwhile it gets out there very slowly. Everyone does their part. Those that actually learn it will use it and win with it. Those that trash it will end up standing there holding their peckers looking silly.

Nothing is hidden. There is no secret that anyone needs to purchase once they get to a certain level. It's human nature at its very best. Who would tell a working method of gambling that might end up proving to be about 2 to 1 advantage in a math expectation of less than 1 to 1? The answer is nobody would. So I used the nobody-would-trick on the world as a joke. For me it's massive fun. Every time these mathZombies flip out and pose in their Spandex they just make my day. These are my "Real Life" statues of sculptured shit. They pose as experts while one day will be seen as suckers. I didn't sucker them with a fake worthless system. I suckered them with a real working system. It's sort of a work of art. They are all going to love it when it gets validated.

 

Good post

 

No substance

 

Of course ya can[t provide proofs. Prattle on nutjob, hey hey.

 

I don't get it why everything must be tested... Can it survive X amount of test doesn't mean it will survive Y amount...or make you a winner....

Besides, please stop judging whether what is discussed will or won't work... it's a discussion, share of experience.... Or some might need an extra stuff rather than just a cashew and Guinness...

 

There is B/P O/R ,BEB O/R ,SR O/R .CR O/R quite difficult to follow all though!

 

Actually IMHO there's more than one stream of data in one bac shoe...

Main road and three derived roads.... or is the derived roads can't be called a data too?

 

Would you care to explain this with examples?

 

OK, then I will suggest a way.

In the example below you have singles on the weak side and on the strong side you have doubles and triples in a state of chop when they occur.

Code:

| X |   |
|   | X |
|   | X |
|   | X |
| X |   |
|   | X |
|   | X |
| X |   |
|   | X |
|   | X |
|   | X |
| X |   |
|   | X |
|   | X |
| X |   |
|   | X |
|   | X |
|   | X |
| X |   |
|   | X |
|   | X |
| X |   |
|   | X |
|   | X |
|   | X |
| X |   |
|   | X |
|   | X |

What appears at first to be a useful pattern that is not perfect is in fact perfect once you can see the bigger picture.

 

A trend is nothing more than repeat of some thing.

For example the bet selection could a repeat of LW/LW/LW or even W/W/W.

Repeating numbers in 36 spins ect.


To increase the accurateness of the bet selection bet a trend/repeating of something that must/should happen .

Just to try and play random trend not in a defined space could be difficult for the layman.That way I like playing in cycles.

Kind regards

B

 

Very clear pattern there gizmotron.

Kind regards

B

 

Identifying characteristics of trends define the cycle in which the bets are placed .

Kind regards

B

 

A micro trend is a short lived sequence that continues. So they can be as short as 3 or 4 in a row. How do you recognize these micro trends?

You learn how to also consider context. There are times when you can see context and times when it is not there. So you need to get skilled at seeing this.

The very best form of this is the Global Effect where the context is almost perfect.

It's very hard to identify this form of coincidence with one data stream. The Global Effect occurs over several simultaneous data streams all occurring at the same time. An example of that would be from the game of Roulette and the three groupings that are the Even Chance bets on the table's layout.

So for the sake of a single data stream like Craps or Baccarat I will point out that a swarm of triples or quads can signal context. It's just a coincidence but these things happen. It could be a total absence of doubles and singles but everything else for a while. They don't look like recognizable patterns yet they are a pattern if you can see the context. It's a skill to expect to see what most people can't see.

This understanding of context is what helps you determine starting points. When there is chaos you can't see context. There are no multiple events. Every trend is different and without patternicity from anything previous. The Global Effect is perfect patternicity. It more rare. I've seen a Global Effect go on for hours.

The more people that become aware of these skills the more this way of searching and identifying these characteristics will become more widely accepted.

For now it's just fantasy & fallacy. That's good too. The casinos can't defend against common randomness.

 

Oh maybe I was wrong... I thought the derived roads which have charts would also be considered as a data stream...

But I guess it wasn't....the only data was the output of P and B only....

But some online casino also have Small/Big bet, based on how many card dealt for each hand.... although itsy not an EC bet with 1:1.5 payout for small and 1:0.5 for big...

 

I'm still waitin for the cat to show me they can "trends" for better than the 50 percents outcome, hey hey.