Baccarat i ownit: Baccarat Lessons by Myrtlejones

Ok, Can u just answer a query For eg, if we have to bet -- MUM, UMU, etc how to convert M_U to P/B

 

You have to add 2 more columns and you bet the 6th column, when you group structures of seven the six column will rotate to an amazing 50% with very little drift, using a negative progression you will grind out steady returns, each shoe will require 6 lines x 3bet= 18 bets only, The betting is related to matching what comes out of the PB column and the EO column its hard to explain without pic

 

Myrtle: this is still interesting thread to study. If I may suggest you to calm down and just do what you're herr at the first time, to share with other

 

Hi, thanks 3 bets per line is max I suppose, if win 1st bet of the line we are done for that line but I am still confused about how to bet, if u could elaborate, with few examples from start of shoe, it will clear up the whole matter,thanks

 

Rav i do not know what kind of a player you are or your goals when you play, there are a couple of ways to play this depending on how much time your willing to spend, i have never lost any part of my bankroll when playing 10 consecutive shoes, when playing online this can take 4 to 5 hours of playing using neg pro, you can set goals for 2 or 3 units per shoe and look for next shoe and repeat,but using a slow neg pro 11122345 is al most impossible to lose but gains are very slow(bank roll protection at its very best)thats why i wanted to explain there is lots to know and i would hate for someone to think they know what there doing and lose money,also it takes time to write things down between hands and then match your next bets up,the casino i play at has evolution gaming as its back ground( LIVE DEALER ONLY )some tables 10, 11 seconds between hands,i still make mistakes or not fast enough at times and i can do this in my sleep, last statement and have to go out,

hands that will beat you- B P B P B P B P B P B P B P--14 chops in a row or 14 bankers in a row
BP
BP
BP
BP
BP
BP
BP 7 bankers 7 players, there are more but how often do these ones come,what i did was take the combinations that are less likely to happen stretch out the shoe, get the least bets out off the most results and bet against them not to repeat, when you bet the six column they very seldom do,drift is never that far and always comes back to middle or very close, and when they go your way they crush for the simple fact that more combinations hit you, because they happen more often, 85 to 90% of shoes do not go past 4 in a line, anyways have to go for now

 

Hi, thanks a lot, for sparing time to explain,BTW I am also playing on Evolution, things are now clearing up, so when u are FREE kindly play a few hands of a shoe, to enable me to practice few shoes within time slot of 10 seconds, I am sick & tired of playing guessing game which ultimately wipes ur Bankroll sooner or later, I am highly obliged, thanks

 

Mr Myrtle,
What do you means by "the six column will rotate to an amazing 50% with little drift" ?
Can you explain with the 8 results that are possible :
mmm
mmu
mum
muu
uuu
uum
umu
umm

 

14 chops will beat it? Then better follow the chops when it shows... I guess that's the best solution...

 

Garfield no not true, just because 14 in a row come out does not mean we are going to lose , it has to hit the first part of the structure, i do not give a rats ass about the shoe i am playing my own results, if the 14 in row start at any point in the previous structure then it will not beat us but there are other combinations that can beat us, that combination has been eliminated, the combinations that can beat you are even on both sides but the combinations that happen more often are in our favor,as i stated the 3 examples 14 bankers 14 chops,7 bankers and 7 players do not make up 2 structures very often, they are all groups or 7,the know it alls swear that 85% of the time a line will not go past 4 but when i go through my stats its higher closer to 90% those are shoes in real time so maybe just the shoes i have played in the last 15 years are different.
Chops, bet the last,bet the last before the last,trends, trends, trends,its all bullshit,if it was that easy everyone would win so why does everyone lose.I have seen and listened to it all and still no one can show a way to win consistently, i will try to post example today if not tomorrow, i have a very busy day, best i write it out on paper takes time

 

Thanks for your effort to teach.

 

Thanks for your decision to want continue explained to us, Myrtlejones

Have a nice day

 

Thanks,a lot Myrtle,

Thanks a lot, Myrtle, Waiting

 

Oops bro boy boy, I’ve been away awhile, your wrong in above post so cool your jets and re read my post , never said anything you think, I think your system is needed for ravi and crew , Im too much of a moron to use it , but I see it’s merits, it’s to complicated for me to use as I play the 20sec stadium baccarat RNG and its too time consuming for me. By the time I fit the column entry the bet is over so don’t lose any blood over me. ,bro .
Take awhile and read Ravi posts here and other threads as I’m sure you will notice he’s taking the piss with his questions to you . He asks the same questions always and that’s the copy and paste I was referring to in my previous post . Have a wee check bro boy boy.
I continue to support your thread and the details are better now you take time to write properly as many others have thanked you for , I will also. Thanks for the thread it is needed on this forum. cheers.
I know most things are unique but a friend of mine uses something similar to what you post for the last few years, you didn’t go to Cambodia in the last few years and hook up with an Aussie expat? . He uses martingale only and has come across the run of outs you have posted . He gets around that by waiting for 3 or 4 losses before he bets then he hammers it martingale style but employees a tie bet insurance in there also. He sears by it . To much of a roller coaster bet ride for me ( the martingale) as I flat bet to profit with the method I use.
I have seen it played and he’s highly strung as one would be from martingale imho. Cheers keep up the great thread.

 

OK here we go sorry for not posting yesterday, never home weekends until snow season,
this is an example from page one pics, number 1 in column 1 is 7 players, column 2 is the results mmm, column 3 is the second result from 7 players, column 4 is the results from column 3, when we combine the the results from column 2 and 4 we get uuu
the first structure is always are base. The second structure is going to create a column 6 and we will be betting the second line in structure 2column 1, bets will always start in the second line of each structure,structures 2,3,4,5,6,7,8 are all compared to stucture 1, column 1, the results are all in column 6,now if we look at the, results in column 2 and move across to column 6 there are no results that are the same, the only structure that beats us is a structure of 7 ,

 

there is more to add computer froze for a bit

 

Good to see a more understandable explanation. I suppose some here who are following get it. I'll stick with what I am doing.

But we always need a reason to place a bet. Following a particular selection at least allows for good MM in that we can get a clear picture of what is going wrong and do something about it. So it's good to see another thought out bet selection.

Virtual wins? Not a big fan but stopping and re-entering on a win can work. When it doesn't it's probably time to leave the shoe.

J

 

Jimske not sure what you mean when you say Virtual wins, this selection has no virtual wins, its a little difficult to grasp until i add more, in this example there is one thing in common with each structure and that is they start with 4 players in my next example you will see where match ups are different, the first 4 results in column 1 of each structure will always be seen before we make our first bet in that structure, column 1 is always 1 step in front of column 3 (top of example page 4 vs4means every structure starts with 4 of the same now when we have a structure that starts with 4 of the same and the next structure starts with 3 and 1 the results will be different, i will post another example tomorrow.

 

Myrtlejones, I notice that in Photo Example # 1, you crossed out the results of column 6. You first wrote that column 6 of structure 2 is the combination of columns 5 of structures 1 and 2.
column 6 of structure 3 is the combination of columns 5 of structures 2 and 3, and so on.

This was the way used in your example from Post # 12, but now that has changed?

Anyway, I'm waiting for the next example to understand more clearly.

 

Sorry, wasn't referring to your method with my comment on virtual wins. I'm not trying to understand your method. I'm pretty much set with my own play.

Continue on.