TurboGenius Informational : What are your chances of winning ?

What is it that you'd like run/simulated?

I have archives of over 1 million spins on real double zero wheels.

 

when looking at Turbo first graph of this thread, I cant help because of the results showing, but to think how beneficial it can be when playing a single number , to wait for just 1 hit during a cycle, and then parlay the bet for another cycle . counting the amount of "second" hit seem to really outweigh the single hits, and on the top of that you get great protection against losing cycles.
tracking a number without even playing it during a 35 spins and just wait for a hit before playing it really make sens.

 

I think, we could test, like TG did.
37players, player1 bet only number1, player2 bet only number2, p3.bet n3....so on...

1)A player, start to bet only when a number hit, and stop bet , when that number fail to hit after 36spins.

2)if a number hit before 36th, restart the bet ....

3)sleeper numbers, no bet whatsoever...


xxxx
testing options
1)test flatbet to see the outcome...
2)test 1u, then if hit, add a unit, 1u again...so on.


Another testing,
again , group of players,
bet only, after, a number, that had hit 2nd time.

thanks...
ps. I am computer illiterate.

 

another option, bet only, the first, 2nd and third horse.
Stop bet, whenever fail to hit in 36spins, resume when, it wake up, as second, or third horse, as the fourth horse still lagging.

 

We could also, bet only the first twelve numbers that appeared.
Bet only after 2nd-hit, hoping for 3rd-hit before 36spins.

 

With all this testing what does ahope to find?

 

Strangely, the number of Founding Fathers increases over time ..

 

I want to party with you….Mr. Excitement

 

Just applying the horse race and make accurate predictions instead of random lucky numbers

 

How was Phnom Penh ?

 

over the years has 3 cycles of loss maximum also been for you like turbogenius in this post mentioned or how high it has rised with 1 number

 

Pretty good thx. Mostly I was on the digital terminals for my plays. Very relaxing and nobody looking over my shoulder...the city itself was quite boring though. Cheap food and even more cheaper beer .... lol

 

It definitely went over 3 cycles. But that's not even a problem. The progression takes care of it . Most in a row would be 6 losses and this are the rfh sessions. The progression has 13 steps so I'm not breaking any sweat at all . ( for playing 1# for 35 spins)

 

squeezing 13 steps into 1000 unit bankroll sounds little complicated. What kind of progression you use exactly to found it to be most effective

 

is the 13 maximum amount of numbers instead. Or what is maximum amount numbers you play at the same time while adding them

 

This is about playing one number. TG demonstrates how its 2/3 vs 1/3 . In his example 3 losses in a row was the most but if you run more tests you'll see it goes +10 losses in a row using that way of selecting a number.

The thing I'm saying we should select our number with the horse race. If the horses are in the right position towards another its time to bet . And we must create better results than 2/3 and apply a progression...up as you win

Select your number wisely

 

i read some your posts you say you play multible numbers adding them and now you stick with 1 ?
also 100 unit session bankroll goes empty very quickly if 1 number with 35 spins no hit. If using more numbers it goes even more quickly. I see 100 unit session looses very frequently

 

This thread is about a single number!
And always, I repeat always make sure you bring enough br for the method you're playing.

Note: don't mix different threads up.

 

The way you predict your number should give you at least a few wins in a row. Which will push you into profit.