Roulette Is anyone beating this game consistently?

Spike. Nobody is listening. They don't care about this petty squabbling. You actually think that you are the owner of Reading Randomness. That's fine. Now let's see you guide people without pissing them off as you dangle nothing for anyone to understand. That's your real story.

 

Triple zero roulette wheels in Las Vegas .

What next ?

 

I went looking for the archives of Gambler's Glen. It was there a couple of years ago. So there is no proof of me using Reading Randomness long before Spike's thread called Reading Random.

So you people have my Reading Randomness here that explains everything and you have Spike's word that he had a thread before mankind landed on the moon. And I recall that thread to. It was another one of his typical tease festivals and the ridiculing of anyone that did not agree or understand him.

This is so boring. Sorry for this people. I'm just going to let him engage others here until he can manipulate people and anger them while teasing them. Let's start with his claim of 85%. He will not be able to substantiate that or prove it with a clear and simple explanation.

 

[QUOTE="Rheti, post: 125824, member: 3934"
We have Gizmo, who sold his Randomness for a couple of Bucks.. was it 1000 dollars ? [/QUOTE]

Wait a minute. Somebody BOUGHT his piece of crap system?? For a lousy grand? LOLOLOLOL!!
That's nothing, you can make that much in a few minutes playing a winning system. it
shows how worthless it really is. And using a name he stole from me, no less. No wonder he
dreaded me coming back here, he didn't want me to find out. LOL Who's the sucker who paid
him for it, is he a member here?

 

[QUOTE="Rheti, post: 125824, member: 3934"
We have Gizmo, who sold his Randomness for a couple of Bucks.. was it 1000 dollars ? [/QUOTE]

Wait a minute. Somebody BOUGHT his piece of crap system?? For a lousy grand? LOLOLOLOL!!
That's nothing, you can make that much in a few minutes playing a winning system. it
shows how worthless it really is. And using a name he stole from me, no less. No wonder he
dreaded me coming back here, he didn't want me to find out. LOL Who's the sucker who paid
him for it, is he a member here?

 

Lucky for you it's gone, because then I could find the Reading Random thread I started and you stole from me. And then sold. Crook.

 

Hey Spike? You still inviting under aged girls down into your basement to spin your wheel? You still riding the gambling bus? That's true about you you know.

I love the way you take a person's words and twist them so that you redefine the meaning. You lie to get imaginary friends to be on your pretend side. You do all this to stay engaged in your pretend life. I'm placing you on ignore. You can enjoy this forum as it will undoubtedly enjoy you. You are a worthless troll.

 

I do not own it because I did not trademark it.
But it is my original idea and you can't say it's yours because it's not. And you know damn well it's not. You aren't that clever.

 

Rheti ,

Tough not to find any dirt on ND. Only that he spoke the truth about something that is well known .

Namely that EC are 100 % Luck and 0 % strategy .


Look for a better shovel to dig up dirt on ND.


ROFL.

 

I gotta say the spike is a serious cat workin with the 88% strikes rate. Too bad he can't do the same with the baccarats, hey hey.

 

ROFL

 

85% not 88%. I can beat Baccarat but it's more tedious and takes longer. Not really worth my time

 

Since you claim to be the originator of the idea and that you had a thread at Gamlbler's Glen that no longer exists as proof then go ahead and tell everyone what "Reading Random" is.

What is your original idea? Prove that you know what it is.

 

Prove it. Show us all what Reading Random means. It's so important to you to get credit for it. Now's your chance.

 

Yet you had enough time to blab your head off without limits at Gambler's Glen. Come on. You should be able to quickly comment on how you can use Reading Random with the hottest number or few numbers. Don't wait. Just share what you can do. You are such a gifted player that deserves respect. LOL

 

Hey Spike? Where are all the people defending you and your original idea "Reading Random?" LOL

 

OK, prove it then. You know damn well that I started the ideas of being able to read the characteristics of randomness. You claim that you know how to "read the random outcomes in roulette" then go ahead and show us. This will go to support my thread Reading Randomness if you are right. This guy claims he has a 85% hit rate. I have claimed that you can still win even when you have lost the expected number of losses through the use of virtual bets. You can lose an unfunded bet selection and it will not effect your session because it didn't risk any of your bankroll.

BTW, Spike will skip my challenge for him to describe what he knows about Reading Random and get triggered by this and try to evade the issue. But this is the issue. He can't back up his claims. LOL

 

37 zeros, alternating red black green, if you bet on red or black you still lose because it’s a zero red or zero black. Plenty of people will play because

“it’s fun”

lol. Cheers

 

Au contraire... It was a real Compliment in this case...

100 % Luck and 0 % strategy .

 

you are a Gentleman within a pack of Wolves....