1. Welcome to the #1 Gambling Community with the best minds across the entire gambling spectrum. REGISTER NOW!
  2. Have a gambling question?

    Post it here and our gambling experts will answer it!
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Discussions in this section are assumed to be EV- as they are outside of the Advantage Play section. For EV+ discussions, please visit the Advantage Play section.
    Dismiss Notice

Roulette Is anyone beating this game consistently?

Discussion in 'Roulette Forum' started by Rinad, Sep 29, 2021.

  1. SPIKE

    SPIKE Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2020
    Likes:
    865
    Location:
    midwest
    The independent random outcomes in roulette are always seeking to do one thing and one thing only. They are seeking balance. They are seeking equality in the number of times the ball Falls in to the pockets. You will never see 100 spins of roulette where the ball falls into one pocket 100 times. You will never see the ball ignore half the pockets for 100 spins. What you will see is a constant unrelenting seeking of balance. If you ever forget this you're screwed. Because then you will think the game is doing something it's not doing and assign characteristics to it that are not really there. Like strong side and weak side. Pure fantasy, pure fallacy.
     
    beachedwhale likes this.
  2. SPIKE

    SPIKE Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2020
    Likes:
    865
    Location:
    midwest
    In hindsight 11 years later that place was a cesspool and probably needed to be destroyed. Caleb actually performed a public service without knowing it.
     
    beachedwhale likes this.
  3. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    Yes dickweed you are correct for once. I invented something that has no power to effect the cause of anything in the future. And this is explained so many times in the Reading Randomness thread that it amazes me that you missed it. Trends and patterns never work for prediction. But at times they take on the elusion that they are predicting when they have no power to do that. It looks like it is working. Now I don't care if you deny this but you say you wait for it to be playing your game. Now that game might be fuck with the reader's heads or it might be when you play Roulette. I wait until the trends are working. Then I bet to speculate on just one next spin to see if that view of a working trend or pattern pays off. And I don't give a shit what you do.
     
    beachedwhale likes this.
  4. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    You are so blind. You are so stupid. You are one of those balance people. Talk about wishful thinking.
     
    beachedwhale likes this.
  5. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    Well of course it should have. You were a joke to everyone by then.
     
    beachedwhale likes this.
  6. SPIKE

    SPIKE Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2020
    Likes:
    865
    Location:
    midwest
    These are dead topics, Gizmo says.

    Not dead to me, if they are dead to you just avoid reading about it. I think the topic is interesting because so many players use trends and patterns, especially in baccarat. It's a mainstay of that game. And in roulette, when people look at the tote board at the past outcomes what do you think they're looking for, their grandma's birthday? They are looking for patterns. That's why the casinos started using them 50 years ago, to encourage people to use them because they know patterns are worthless. They are half right. To the vast majority of people they are worthless. But if you spend enough time studying outcomes you can use them to some degree of success. But like I keep saying it's a tedious and exhausting way to play and you have to have a lot of time on your hands to play it effectively.[/QUOTE]
     
    Last edited: Nov 13, 2021
    beachedwhale likes this.
  7. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    Who gives a fuck Spike. Trends and patterns has been explained in detail with actual examples of it occurring. And it has been demonstrated and exploited by many working on it. It doesn't have to mean anything. It doesn't have to tell the future. You just use it and if they are like you you can forget about it. This is just more Blah, Blah, Blah.

    Why aren't you online making money?
     
    beachedwhale likes this.

  8. SPIKE

    SPIKE Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2020
    Likes:
    865
    Location:
    midwest
    So you think independent random events have intelligence? Is that what you're saying? The game is seeking balance, how could it be doing anything other than that. It's a little ball looking for a pocket to fall into. Random chance dictates where it will fall. You think something else is going on? Like what, please elaborate.
     
    beachedwhale likes this.
  9. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    No Mr. Sophistry. Do you think that being a jerk like you are is good for your ego?
     
    beachedwhale likes this.
  10. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    Dumb guy methods. The game is not seeking anything. It's all coincidence. You are saying that independent events are seeking something. HAHAHA LOL. Who's using the illusions for form fitting? it's you.
     
    Last edited: Nov 13, 2021
    beachedwhale likes this.
  11. SPIKE

    SPIKE Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2020
    Likes:
    865
    Location:
    midwest
    By who, you? If you think you're seeing strong sides and weak sides in random outcomes they haven't been explained very well. It sounds like what you've done is assigned all kinds of characteristics to randomness that don't really exist and then you pretend they do exist. Does that sound about right?
     
    beachedwhale likes this.
  12. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    Why is it that I can get every person on this planet to see strong side and weak side without any trouble. I mean this is so lame. You are so invested in your blinders. Why are you so mad?
    '
    I got Johno, that hates my politics, to see it well on the first page.
     
    Last edited: Nov 13, 2021
    beachedwhale likes this.
  13. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    It sounds like you are the exception to the rule. You can pretend to see out of your ass and impress people.
     
    beachedwhale likes this.
  14. SPIKE

    SPIKE Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2020
    Likes:
    865
    Location:
    midwest
    Not just any independent event, independent events in roulette. Because roulette is a closed system made up of a set number of pockets. The ball has no choice except to fall into the pockets an equal number of times eventually. So in that sense, yes, the game is always unconsciously balancing itself. This is why it works. This is why it is so hard to beat.
     
    beachedwhale likes this.

  15. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    Yes. It's pretend. Only I don't pretend that they have any importance It's just an illusion. It has no power. But I never expected someone like you to come along and complain about it. I'm using the illusion of form to find win streaks with virtual bets and then I speculate one bet to see if it pays off. It's taking advantage of coincidence. It works. The results by myself and others confirms that it works. People are free to find out if it works for them. They can work on it. They can take it or leave it without any concern here that it worked or not. Everything is explained. They will convince themselves and don't need convincing by anyone else.

    Now you have come to tease people and mess with their heads for years to come. People will be watching out for that. Those that know you already treat you like a punching bag. That is not an illusion.
     
    beachedwhale likes this.
  16. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    This is why you are all hot air and sophistry.
     
    beachedwhale likes this.
  17. Dr. Sir Anyone Anyone

    Dr. Sir Anyone Anyone Well-Known Member Lineage to Founders

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2015
    Likes:
    931
    Occupation:
    Shoe Cobbler
    Location:
    Merica
    Gizmo,

    You can't blame Spike for calling you out on stealing some of his ideas and claiming them as your own.
     
    Last edited: Nov 13, 2021
    beachedwhale likes this.
  18. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    I explained openly and he changed it to his version of events. So One last time. He is claiming that he coined the phrase Reading Randomness. It occurred while I was discussing characteristics of randomness with him that even today he acts like he never heard of. Gads, these are published all over the internet. He said, and I quote "read the random." I went on that same day on Gambler's Glen and said " Reading Randomness." I coined Reading Randomness. It's an exact syntax of characters. Now I got the idea of using it from his comment about my work. He can't claim my work on characteristics and to this day act like he has never seen it before. That is what we are arguing about. It's infantile. Why does he want credit for something that he is clearly attempting to discredit? He's just playing with me. It matters nothing to him. But I like him being a gambling dunmbshit with a secret method just the same.
     
    beachedwhale likes this.
  19. SPIKE

    SPIKE Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2020
    Likes:
    865
    Location:
    midwest
    You present no arguments for what I say
    , just insults. Is that all you have? Apparently so.
     
    beachedwhale likes this.
  20. SPIKE

    SPIKE Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2020
    Likes:
    865
    Location:
    midwest
    Because I absolutely did
    and I even started thread called reading random. And you pounced on it like a chicken on a bug. You never claimed then that it was your idea, it was until much later that you dreamed that up. This is such a stupid argument, you only want it to be your idea because you named your system after it. Sorry chum, we both know whose idea it is and it's not yours. I love how you say how you 'predicted' that I would come here and say this. Why would you even think that, why would it even occur to you if it wasn't true. Why would I give a rip. It's just another stupid gambling phrase. But I happen to be the one who thought it up so of course I would claim it's mine.
     
    beachedwhale likes this.

Share This Page