Roulette Is anyone beating this game consistently?

Tell us your secret

 

Why someone believe me or you, no proof no nothing, just a words.

 

Careful at a cattle crossing .

 

I've been beating it for 15 years. They just made online gambling legal again in Michigan and live dealers came online in late July. So I have no need to ever go to a brick-and-mortar casino again. I see Turbo and Gizmo are still around. Has anything changed?

 

Same old naysayers telling everyone we can't win. Trolling many threads for the last decade. Lol

 

Beating the game means you have a winning session almost every time you play. Or every time you play. I have been playing Michigan online casinos for a couple months now and I've noticed something interesting. All the casinos here use Evolution Gaming for their live dealers. I play a game I invented using the outcomes of roulette. It's playable about 85% of the time. Which means I have to play virtually for a number of spins to see if I'm winning. What's interesting is when I Have a session where I would not be winning because it's unplayable, it is also unplayable at other online casinos like Bovada. Bovada has 2 live roulette wheels, zero and double zero. And if my game is unplayable at Evolution it's also unplayable Bovada at the same time. How is this possible. I know that the outcomes in roulette are like a long sine wave, they have peaks and valleys. How is it those peaks and valleys could be occurring at exactly the same time on other roulette wheels. Unless it's just a coincidence but it sure happens a lot for it to be a coincidence.

 

Bbbwaaaaaaaahhh the spike has returned talkin roulettes. Where's the john-O at when ya need him, hey hey????

 

This paragraph has everything a gambler needs to know in order to win (or to stop being a gambler, lol).

 

Yes. I'm older and wiser. I almost quit. I could not control myself. I would allow myself to dig deep into my bankroll and wait for the super win streaks to bounce back, and then into profit. I was not strategic at that. So I lost a lot of bankrolls. Then someone around here posted a YouTube video on trading the stock market like a casino. It included a nice section on "moving averages."

So I discovered that a rigid way of playing might give me self control. So I came up with a rigid bankroll of 3 net wins or 7 net losses and out, session done either way. That worked. I then refined the process for observing the effectiveness states. That was also simplified. It became bet big while in the condition of a confirmed win streak and bet smallest allowable during any other condition. So that became a rigid rule that requires conditional awareness as a skill. I used this rigid set of playing rules to see how it did. It worked. I could relax and just sit back and protect the bankroll.

After a year of that I decided to seek proof that it worked in two aspects important to me. I wanted to know if it was my highly refined skills at detecting trends or patterns that were in a state or condition of continuing or if this could be duplicated through private tutoring with someone that begins with no skills like that. So I charged one willing student to pay me $1,000 for months of 1 on 1 personal tutoring. I ended up making around $8.33 per hour. It took two months at 2 hours per day, every day. My student went from losing to winning. His win to loss ratio in units earned went from below the mathematical expectation of around 47% to a whopping 66%. In other words he would take away 4.66 won sessions at 3 net wins to each lost session at 7 net losses. So that adds up to 14 units won for each 7 units lost.

So I had all the proof that I needed. I waited one year and then I decided to write a self teaching course in the form of a discussion thread. I wanted to see if anyone else could reach this same level of skill, 2 to 1 in an EC game that should at best produce 1 to 1. And some people took up the challenge. They showed their results as documented growth while learning. That was two and a half years ago. The thread is done. It speaks for itself. The mathBoyz have not attempted to debunk it. But the skill is completely explained, demonstrated, and given examples.

Now I just sit around and discuss other people's impressions of their systems and progressions. Right now Turbo is conducting interest in hot number chasing. He will not "wise up a sucker." I don't blame him. So what have you been doing?

 

And Luckyfella is a pristine fragrance of flowers whos shit does not stink.

 

What next ?The hidden Math ?


Where is that A F Wendel when he is needed ?

 

You have a thread here the details exactly what you do? Where is it and I'll tell you whether it works or not.

 

Care Gizmo, he's going to throw a BF and try and scratch you!

 

I already know that it works or not. I'm surprised that you didn't bother to find it yourself considering what it's called.

 

BTW, what proof is there that this is the original Spike?

 

The concept of reading random
was my idea, remember? And weren't you really sick about 10 years ago on the verge of death from
heart failure? Yet here you are. Why don't you just put a link to the thread save me the trouble of looking for it. I'm not familiar with how this phone works

 

Let's discuss this anyway. We were having a conversation where the concepts of randomness characteristics were my information that I was sharing, validated by the posting history at Gambler's Glen. In that discussion you summarized what I was saying by say the phrase "read the random. I was pointing out that you can recognize the characteristics. Later that day I said reading randomness for the first time, not read the random. BTW, I predicted that you would come here and say it was all your idea.

Only remember this. You went all over the internet saying that I was kissing up to you in order to get your secret. Do you remember doing that? You told everyone that you never divulged your secret. So here you are. You are doing just what I predicted you would do. If Reading Randomness was your idea then tell us all how it works before you find my thread. And if you do guess correctly you can congratulate me for figuring out your idea. You know that idea that you never shared. You are boxed in now. So dig your way out.

My thread requires a computer and at least a very large screen. That's the one I published from my ideas like Elegant Patterns and the Global Effect. Those are published all over the internet all the way back to Gambler's Glen. I don't recall you taking any shit off of the trolls, mathBoyz, or system junkies back then for that idea. Your thing was trashing others and never telling your secrets. Most people hated you. I wonder why?

 

Can you believe the gall if this scrounger? He wants people to believe that he invented trend recognition. I mean way before he or I was ever born. You can go to the archives at Gambler's Glen and see where he never discusses the characteristics of trends or patterns. What a loser. I wonder what happened. Something did not go well and he's here for attention and suckering people. You won't get anything from Spike.

 

People beating roulette wont want to shout about it,as they dont want the casinos to know that they can be beaten in the long run.

Because so few win consistently it is easy to stay under the radar as long as you dont get greedy.

There are ways online to make it look like you have lost all your winnings if you use online casinos that also have a Sportsbook,which means you could carry on winning for years without being banned.

 

Maybe Spike is unhappy at the WOV. No where to go but here.

He might have something new for discussions .


Glad to see him again .