Roulette Is it possible to Beat Roulette?

But what is a winning system one must ask...

What is your idea of a winning system...

a gauranteed easy income??with doing as little as possible....that would be lovely....

But god has commanded us to work 6 days has he not..lol....so the system will probably require us to work constantly at it for 6 days but it will be a gauranteed income without risk...just have to keep clicking i guess for 6 days.lol

Or maybe god wants us to destroy roulette by finding the system that will send casinos crashing .....

Just like johnny cash sang....tell the ramblers the gamblers,god is gonna cut you down....or sumat like that....

Im gonna stop talking now.lol

 

You remind me of a grandpa who told me at the bar: it is not difficult to beat Roulette, you just have to play the opposite of your favourite system which makes you lose. He loved to play zero sector after a losing streak, some nights he made a killing, and sometimes he was losing big. If I played all sectors excepted zero and voisins, I would have won when he was losing, but overall we would both be losing in the long run, cause of the house edge.
Roulette math is set in stone, despite the fact a ball and a wheel are constantly spun and different numbers appear in the scoreboard!.

 

Bago after all these experienced what is your verdict? Can roulette be beaten?

 

can believe that could happen specially if you know when to stop

 

It is possible to beat roulette only if you dont play too much. The longer you play, the more you are exposed to the house edge. Never buy any system. Any system for sale is a scam. If you want to earn from gambling then poker is best

 

Roulette is a more relaxing game than poker . Protecting the bankroll is of paramount importance .


Just set win goal and loss limit and ignore the house edge otherwise stay home.

 

Another really good system. I really like this one!
It reminds me of |4 times the power" by GLC on the rouletteforum
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZV_3mhYe3A8

 

Roma ,


I have played the Mongoose method a few times and I can see it`s potential. It is a ver well programmed MM system .

 

Roma ,

The Mongoose would be better than the other positive Charles Getting progression also with various programmed stages .

ND

 

Yes! Some people find it ingenious and effective.
I don't use it very often.

 

Very good point about the Charles Getting progression

 

Hey gizmotron,

Interesting stuff, not sure I understand that graph. Is it an effectiveness chart? Im doing my own research at the moment and would like to know if you have more data on the graph?

You said "This graph is from betting only on red numbers at $90 per bet with 200 back to back bets."

Does this mean that every bet was consecutive?
Can you please share every consecutive number result?
Can you please tell me what wheel you were playing on (either American or European)? Number sequences are way different.
What was each spin direction for every bet?
Was it a single or double zero wheel?

I'd like to know this because I have an idea about colour inversion. I think colour inversion happens when the ball goes past zero, or double zero, and the ball lands on the other side of the wheel from the previous result. For instance, red to red may actually be red to black. Say the ball enters from one side (red result), goes past zero or double zero and lands on the other side (new red result), the new red result is really black. This is because zero and double zero changes between red and black every spin, and IS NEVER GREEN

 

Interesting hypothesis. You should know at the start that I'm a huge fan of "magical thinking." That's what they call it in addiction self help books on gambling. You see something and get a belief about it because you lack experience. And it sounds like you are on track to get that experience too. It's good that you came to a gambling forum to ask questions. Many here can give you some of their knowledge and experience just by discussing things.

Every bet was consecutive and only placed on red at the same value.

I don't know if I bothered to publish the telemetry from that 200 spin test. I don't think I did. I think I put a video together that shows these principles of win streaks. It's based on just betting on red also.

I think I play on the American wheel most of the time because it's the harder odd's wheel to beat. I like sticking it in the face of the chronically-fatigued-over-math crowd. You'll love those guys.

The spins are generated by a fair RNG computer based algorithm that is part of the C and C+ computer language found in my computer's operating system, in their Class Libraries.

As far as the number sequencing goes on a wheel I have discovered that I can teach Reading Randomness to anyone and they can learn groupings and sets from the American wheel and they will create the same kind of magical looking patterns and trends as they would if the European wheel groupings where used. They were taught without knowing and they never noticed that I did that to them. Funny how people come to believe in the spaces or slots on a wheel and that they mean something other than the numbers written in them. The wheel is just a mechanical RNG. Some people believe that because it is made of physical matter that it has some metaphysical power that the human sixth sense can channel or observe in some form of synchronicity. Regarding that I have come to the conclusion that it is no more consistent than being in synchronous orbit with the effectiveness states, while a win streak occurs. In other words it works at times and at other times it does not.

If I were to place a guess at this point I would say that this is very good "Troll Craft." Keep going. There are people here that might think you have discovered something.

 

Agree with you, roulette also seems to me more relaxing kind of gambling.

 

Now that I read it, I must sound like a bit of a crazy person when I say that zero or double zero aren't really green.

 

Color-Blind is a vision anomaly, it is NOT your fault.

 

Yes, right you are.

 

I liked the way you said that - the longer you play, the less you win, due to house edge.

 

I believe it can. But not with a rigid system. More with good judgement. Super tight money management. And exposing yourself as little as possible to the variance of the game.

And leaving when you are up. If you can win 4 out of 5 sessions. And you have tight money management. And loss limit etc. You can come out on top overall.

 

I thought the same, but could never get it to win over time. Despite sharp MM and playing using probability in the player’s favor as much as possible, countless variations, etc, nothing ever passed real spin testing.

Even Turbo lending a hand privately (thanks Ed) couldn’t get me to the promised land, it just wasn’t there for me in terms of being able to understand how to put the pieces together.

Only when I turned to Baccarat did I ultimately develop a method of play that won over time regardless of volume. I couldn’t crack roulette, and greatly admire those of you out there who manage to win consistently at it (Ed, Ken, ND, the other usual suspects I’m forgetting, etc).