Roulette Lies MathBoyz, Therapists, and Casinos Want You to Believe

I showed the video so that I could show him perpetuating the lie. The secrets he shows in trading strategies are in regards to moving averages.

 

And by being skilled at using win streaks.

 

Well i allready had strange experiment with this several time but i got to say that it could be also irrationnal thinking...

I can remember easily when a precognition was right because my brain will focus on it and remember it, but my brain will also forget easily everytime i felt something that didn't happen. Truth is i wanna see the result and the sd related and see if that could make better than the best random'sd on the same scale of numbers.

You could also make a survivorship bias mistake when you focus on few guys that performed with precognition, focus on them and forget easily all others that are not performing.

 

System players like Gimzo crack me up.

Why is it that math illiterates like Gizmo and Precog are soooo certain that everyone that does comprehend basic probability and math are wrong?

 

According to a post on another thread all one needs is a Happy Wheel .


play at your own risk .

 

Precognition works!

Humans have always practiced this ability. You should look into it more.

probability and statistics are pseudo realities. They are true on certain occasions and not true in others.

 

Probability is not absolute. It can't tell you when a win streak will occur, how long it will last, and when it will end. I can lose hundreds of more bet selections than the long term "law of large numbers" suggests and still beat the crap out of the casino. It doesn't take a math genius or a third grader that just tried the times table. This quack of a doctor has been a probability absolutist for more than 20 years and is responsible for destroying the Gambler's Glen discussion forum. He recruits gullible newbies that are impressed by his staunch stand on ridged probability. Don't believe me? Just wait until he tries to put you to work for him.

If you want to actually beat roulette then forget math. You would be well advised to figure out what a win streak is about and how to detect and use it to your advantage.

I told you that there would be people that hang on to the math until the last minute. The Dr. here is Snowman from the Gambler's Glen days and is the original "snowflake" and "Fake News." His greatest achievement on gambling forums is to never to answer difficult questions, be obnoxious, and attract gullible new people into private conversations where he can prey on them. He thinks he is the master of finding defective Roulette wheels. He thinks he can teach Dealer Signature. He only bothers me because he is like Jesse Jackson and just needs to show up in any thread that has people's attention. It's the same old scam. He puts down the topic of the thread in order to impress newbies. You never see him start a thread of his own where he explains what he really wants from people. He is a drag on society. I don't hate him anymore. He is a complete waste of attention. He's not a mentally ill attention whore. He is a pragmatic and deliberate user of people with a deliberate method of recruiting. You have been warned, again.

 

Ok but just show the proofs, because when i look around in this forum, it seems everything is working against roulette you know...
Gizmouton, turomalus,Sergio, Vadis, Five, jhinks, rouletteghost, parpaluck, and so much more...

 

What would constitute as proof for you?

 

Roulette Ghost is not an innovator but a mixed up copy cat .
and an ex forumtard .

 

This

On a significative sample...

But i'm curious to know avout what convinced you? What are the facts/proofs +source?

 

Sheeptracker needs a mathematical proof before he will accept any truth. Funny how skeptics define the rules. He needs a significant sample. He needs proof. This gets old.

What he needs is a therapist that will lie to him.

 

Instead replying on a personal or ego forum I would like to mention if a streak ion an EC is noticed then either go with it , against it , or do nothing .


ND

 

Gizmouton, your little brain is too exposed to all conspiracies... If your little brain would notice that you use to won 3 times in a row on afternoon and lose once on evening, you could state "Well casinos put magnets on evening"

Sad part is that i even don't need math to check your bs system, you're so full of s*** that it is enough to use it as a proof...

 

Hahaha!

 

We're supposed to believe that all of the math, basic probability, experts, and history are all wrong and instead believe Gizmo (a math illiterate) is right. Hmmmm...yep, that makes complete sense!

 

Dr. Sir AA it took Gizmo 14 years to have found the light with randomness reading while some only take a quick glance at the score board.


That`s an accomplishment equal to turbo`s FARTHEST back fallacy .



We must bow looooooow in view of those accomplishments .

 

Here:

Code:

 repeat while pp < 18
    put 1 into ep
    repeat for each element ep in rkoR
      put ((xL bitAnd 4278190080) / 16777216)  bitAnd 255 into a
      put ((xL bitAnd 16711680) / 65536) into b
      put ((xL bitAnd 65280) / 256) into c
      put (xL bitAnd 255) into d
      put (((  ((S1[a + 1] + S2[b + 1]) mod 4294967296) bitXor S3[c + 1]  ) + S4[d + 1] ) mod 4294967296) bitXor xR into xR
      put xL into temp
      put xR into xL
      put temp into xR
    end repeat
    put xL into temp
    put xR into xL
    put temp into xR
    put xR bitXor bfPb[17] into xR
    put xL bitXor bfPb[18] into xL
    put xL into bfP3[pp]
    put xR into bfP3[pp + 1]
    put pp + 2 into pp
  end repeat
-------------------------

 put char 1 to 4 of strV into strB1
  put char 5 to 8 of strV into strB2
  repeat while ic <= textCryptlength
    put (cryptThisText[ix + 3]) + ((cryptThisText[ix + 2]) * 256) + ((cryptThisText[ix + 1]) * 65536) + ((cryptThisText[ix]) * 16777216) bitAnd 4294967295 into xL
    put (cryptThisText[ix + 7]) + ((cryptThisText[ix + 6]) * 256) + ((cryptThisText[ix + 5]) * 65536) + ((cryptThisText[ix + 4]) * 16777216) bitAnd 4294967295 into xR
    repeat for each element dwnSpt in rkoR
      put xL bitXor bfP3[dwnSpt] into xL
      put ((xL bitAnd 4278190080) / 16777216)  bitAnd 255 into a
      put ((xL bitAnd 16711680) / 65536) into b
      put ((xL bitAnd 65280) / 256) into c
      put (xL bitAnd 255) into d
      put (((  ((S1[a + 1] + S2[b + 1]) mod 4294967296) bitXor S3[c + 1]  ) + S4[d + 1] ) mod 4294967296) bitXor xR into xR
      put xL into temp
      put xR into xL
      put temp into xR
    end repeat
    put xL into temp
    put xR into xL
    put temp into xR
    put xR bitXor bfP3[2] into xR
    put xL bitXor bfP3[1] into xL

I wrote that 18 years ago in a computer language that never supported unsigned numbers for this algorithm.

 

Mark ,



Does anyone accomplish anything at a roulette table with the chart above ?


Maybe the RFcc gang is more inclined to accept this . Times have changed .



It is over when it is over .

 

It's pretty much done here. I mean I have done a good enough job of presenting it. I personally taught three people to success. It looks like a few learned enough to be successful from the RR thread here.

One of them or myself will break loose in the open with it and make news. Once that happens those that rejected it here will be the flat earth society. I know it works. I shared it clearly and openly. You can lead a horse to water but you can't make them drink.

I'm off to prove it works. It does not matter a thing what people think now. The House's advantage being presented as proof that you can't win is a lie.

What is that line? "Let the dead bury the dead." Gambling forums are dead.